August 30, 2011
The Board (NLRB) proposed a new rule requiring employers to post a notice and solicited public comments on its potential impact, particularly under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Board | person | 0 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022315.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, discussing a proposed rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Board's response to public comments. Various business associations and law firms raised concerns about the compliance costs and economic impact on small businesses, particularly regarding legal fees and requirements for electronic notice posting. Despite the user's prompt, this document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein; it is a regulatory document concerning U.S. labor law.
Events with shared participants
Publication of a Federal Register notice containing rules and regulations, including a dissenting opinion on a new labor rule.
2011-08-30 • USA
A dissenting opinion was issued by the author in the case of J. Picini Flooring, 356 NLRB No. 9.
2010-01-01
Publication of a final rule in the Federal Register regarding an employer notice-posting requirement. The document details the Board's response to public comments received during the rulemaking process.
2011-08-30 • N/A (Federal publication)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event