Event Details

August 30, 2011

Description

The Board (NLRB) proposed a new rule requiring employers to post a notice and solicited public comments on its potential impact, particularly under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
The Board person 0 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022315.jpg

Page from the Federal Register, specifically from 'Rules and Regulations', with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp. • 4.09 MB
View

This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, discussing a proposed rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Board's response to public comments. Various business associations and law firms raised concerns about the compliance costs and economic impact on small businesses, particularly regarding legal fees and requirements for electronic notice posting. Despite the user's prompt, this document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein; it is a regulatory document concerning U.S. labor law.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Publication of a Federal Register notice containing rules and regulations, including a dissenting opinion on a new labor rule.

2011-08-30 • USA

View

A dissenting opinion was issued by the author in the case of J. Picini Flooring, 356 NLRB No. 9.

2010-01-01

View

Publication of a final rule in the Federal Register regarding an employer notice-posting requirement. The document details the Board's response to public comments received during the rulemaking process.

2011-08-30 • N/A (Federal publication)

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 05:25

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022315.jpg
Date String
Prior to 2011-08-30

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event