Event Details
January 01, 1996
Description
Witness traveled to New Mexico
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| [REDACTED] witness | person | 6 | View Entity |
| [REDACTED WITNESS] | person | 46 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
Source Documents (4)
EFTA00025501.pdf
This document is an email thread between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, spanning January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of 1995-1996 journal entries and photographs, and schedules a second interview with the witness. The prosecution explicitly states they have 'no doubts whatsoever' about the witness's candor and truthfulness.
EFTA00025324.pdf
This document contains an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, visits to Epstein's house, and social outings with him. The prosecutors also request a follow-up interview with the witness, noting they found her previous testimony credible.
EFTA00025305.pdf
This document is a series of email chains between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness cooperating in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of the witness's journal entries from 1995-1996 and schedules a follow-up interview. The journals confirm the witness visited Epstein's NY house in January 1996 and went to the movies with him.
EFTA00023169.pdf
This document is an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The emails discuss scheduling a follow-up interview in May 2020 for a witness located in Texas who has a 'patient schedule'. The chain also includes correspondence from January 2020 where the SDNY requests, and McCawley provides, specific journal entries from the witness dating back to late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, visiting Epstein's house, and going to the movies with him.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
First massage incident. The witness and another person massaged Epstein. Epstein masturbated while the witness rubbed his chest, climaxing on his towel. The witness was paid $200.
Date unknown • Epstein's House (Master Bedroom)
Second massage incident. The witness massaged Epstein alone. Epstein instructed her to get naked, then masturbated while she rubbed his chest. He then used a vibrator on her vagina for 2-3 minutes before climaxing on his towel. The witness was paid $200.
Date unknown • Epstein's House (Master Bedroom/Bathroom Area)
A witness describes an encounter where an unnamed male got off a table, exposed himself, "whacked off," and was described as physically disgusting. The witness provides a physical description of the man, including his hairy chest and small penis.
Date unknown • Not specified
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Firm partner meetings.
2009-01-01 • RRA Firm
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
A witness was personally served by a process server and handed contact information.
Date unknown
A deposition where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness who is represented by Mr. Leopold.
2017-07-26 • Unknown
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event