December 30, 2014
Reference date for establishing common interest privilege between the witness and various legal teams.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRAD EDWARDS | person | 349 | View Entity |
| Boies Schiller Firm | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Scarola Firm | person | 0 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021860.jpg
This document is page 37 of a rough draft deposition transcript stamped by House Oversight. The witness is being questioned by Mr. Simpson regarding which attorneys they held a 'common interest privilege' with as of December 30, 2014. The witness identifies Brad Edwards, attorneys from Boies Schiller (representing Virginia Roberts), and Mr. Scarola (representing Brad Edwards).
Events with shared participants
Declarant hired Brad Edwards.
2008-06-01 • Unknown
Federal court hearing where declarant learned of the secret plea deal.
2008-07-01 • Federal Court
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Filing of this Victims' Response document.
2008-08-01 • Court Docket
Firm partner meetings.
2009-01-01 • RRA Firm
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
A witness was personally served by a process server and handed contact information.
Date unknown
A deposition where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness who is represented by Mr. Leopold.
2017-07-26 • Unknown
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event