Event Details
October 13, 2021
Description
Oral argument was scheduled in the United States v. Tsarnaev case.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Supreme Court | organization | 403 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00005335.jpg
This document is a proposed juror questionnaire from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It includes a section on 'Media Issues' which is contested by the government and defended by the defendant. The defendant's response argues for in-depth questioning about media exposure, citing legal precedents like the Tsarnaev case to emphasize the necessity of uncovering potential juror bias in high-profile cases involving individuals like Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case: Freytag v. Commissioner. A unanimous Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court under the Appointments Clause.
1991-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *Myers v. United States*, where the Court vindicated the President's refusal to enforce a law he believed was unconstitutional.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *Freytag v. Commissioner*, where the Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court, leading to a concurrence by Justice Scalia on Presidential power.
1991-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the President refused to enforce a law limiting his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated his interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Freytag v. Commissioner, which ruled on the appointment of special trial judges and included a concurrence from Justice Scalia on presidential power.
1991-01-01 • United States
The Supreme Court case Myers v. United States (272 U.S. 52) was litigated. The court struck down a statute limiting the President's removal power as unconstitutional.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the court struck down a statute limiting the President's removal power.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case American Hospital Association v. NLRB (AHA) is cited, where the court upheld the NLRB's health care unit rule.
1991-01-01 • United States
The Supreme Court recognized the practice of presidential signing statements in the case of INS v. Chadha.
1983-01-01 • N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event