December 18, 2007
Ms. Conrad's legal career was "destroyed" when she was suspended.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Conrad | person | 69 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad. Attorney Mr. Shechtman questions her about why she made several omissions during jury selection, including failing to disclose her husband's criminal history. The questioning explores her motivations, such as a $40/day juror stipend, unemployment, and an intellectual curiosity for the courtroom, and challenges her distinction between an "omission" and a "lie".
Events with shared participants
A trial where Ms. Conrad and eleven other jurors rendered a verdict against Paul M. Daugerdas.
2012-02-15 • Federal Court
Ms. Conrad was asked by the Court if she owned any stocks or bonds, to which she replied "none of your business."
2025-12-20 • Federal Court
A date mentioned in a question to Ms. Conrad, possibly related to the trial or a related proceeding.
2011-03-01 • Federal Court
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
The government received Ms. Conrad's letter.
2025-05-01
Afternoon session of a court inquiry, addressing matters that developed over the luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and her voice mail message. Examination of 'The Answerer' regarding finances.
2012-02-15 • Court
A past event where Ms. Conrad responded to questions, stating her highest level of education was a BA and that she was a stay-at-home wife.
Date unknown
The witness, Ms. Conrad, is testifying under court order.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
A subpoena was served on the witness by Judge Pauley.
2011-12-20
The witness met with Ms. Sternheim six times before the current date.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event