Event Details
November 21, 2005
Description
Sworn statement/deposition of the witness.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| attorneys | person | 70 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
| Detective | person | 12 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
EFTA00029390.pdf
This document is a sworn statement from a former houseman/majordomo who worked for Jeffrey Epstein from 1991 to 2002 at the Palm Beach residence (358 El Brillo). The witness describes Ghislaine Maxwell as his boss and the manager of all Epstein's households. He testifies to the frequent presence of young girls (estimated 16-17 years old) giving massages, the use of sex toys found in the home, and high volumes of towels used daily. The witness also details a recent incident where he was contacted by a private investigator named Paul, hired by Epstein's legal team, who questioned him and advised him regarding his cooperation with the police.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Firm partner meetings.
2009-01-01 • RRA Firm
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
Transmission of a document containing an agreement regarding confidential information obtained via subpoena for crime investigation.
2005-07-15 • Palm Beach
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
A witness was personally served by a process server and handed contact information.
Date unknown
A remarkable hearing where victims provided testimony and input, and attorneys offered legal advocacy and submissions.
Date unknown
A deposition where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness who is represented by Mr. Leopold.
2017-07-26 • Unknown
A meeting with attorneys took place. AK states she never met with them again and no investigation was opened as a result.
2016-02-29 • SDNY
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event