January 01, 1969
Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., which emphasized the existence of the Board's legislative rulemaking authority.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Labor Relations Board | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Wyman-Gordon Co. | person | 0 | View Entity |
| U.S. Supreme Court | organization | 403 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022279.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) legal justification for its rulemaking authority under the NLRA. It refutes comments from organizations opposing a proposed rule by citing numerous Supreme Court precedents that affirm broad rulemaking powers for federal agencies. This document is purely a legal and administrative text and contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals.
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case: Freytag v. Commissioner. A unanimous Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court under the Appointments Clause.
1991-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *Myers v. United States*, where the Court vindicated the President's refusal to enforce a law he believed was unconstitutional.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *Freytag v. Commissioner*, where the Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court, leading to a concurrence by Justice Scalia on Presidential power.
1991-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the President refused to enforce a law limiting his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated his interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Freytag v. Commissioner, which ruled on the appointment of special trial judges and included a concurrence from Justice Scalia on presidential power.
1991-01-01 • United States
The Supreme Court case Myers v. United States (272 U.S. 52) was litigated. The court struck down a statute limiting the President's removal power as unconstitutional.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the court struck down a statute limiting the President's removal power.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case American Hospital Association v. NLRB (AHA) is cited, where the court upheld the NLRB's health care unit rule.
1991-01-01 • United States
The Supreme Court recognized the practice of presidential signing statements in the case of INS v. Chadha.
1983-01-01 • N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event