Event Details
Unknown
Description
Deposition testimony regarding procedural rules for answering questions.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed questioning attorney | person | 0 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021831.jpg
This is page 8 of a rough draft deposition transcript. The text begins with a procedural discussion between a questioner and a witness regarding how questions should be answered. Mr. Scarola interrupts to ask about a document placed before him, which Mr. Scott confirms is a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book, provided in response to a request made during a previous deposition.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Firm partner meetings.
2009-01-01 • RRA Firm
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
A witness was personally served by a process server and handed contact information.
Date unknown
A deposition where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness who is represented by Mr. Leopold.
2017-07-26 • Unknown
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination regarding Jeffrey Epstein's wealth and bank accounts at JP Morgan, including discussion of Government Exhibit 504.
2022-08-10
A witness was on the stand for cross-examination and began to clarify details about moving to a second address in Palm Beach as a teenager.
Date unknown • Courtroom
The document provides instructions for a jury regarding witness testimony during 'this trial' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Date unknown • Southern District
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event