Event Details
Historical (relative to interview)
Description
Massage and Sexual Misconduct
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| He (subject) | person | 2 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00031117.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of an interview with a female witness whose name is redacted. She recounts an incident where she was instructed to give a massage to a man (referred to as 'he'), during which he masturbated ('whacked off') and made comments about her body. The witness describes receiving money immediately after, leaving with another woman named Haley who knew what was happening, and subsequently going shopping at Marshall's.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
An incident where an unnamed male ('he') touched the witness ('A') on her back, butt, breast area, and vaginal area over her underwear while he was masturbating. The witness was not wearing a bra.
Date unknown • Undetermined
A series of massage sessions were conducted by the witness ('A') for an unnamed male ('he'). The massages sometimes included back, feet, head, and leg massages. The male subject masturbated during less than half of these sessions. The witness typically wore panties but was topless, and on one occasion was willingly fully nude for a foot massage.
Date unknown • Undisclosed
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Firm partner meetings.
2009-01-01 • RRA Firm
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
A witness was personally served by a process server and handed contact information.
Date unknown
A deposition where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness who is represented by Mr. Leopold.
2017-07-26 • Unknown
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination regarding Jeffrey Epstein's wealth and bank accounts at JP Morgan, including discussion of Government Exhibit 504.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event