Event Details
Unknown (Past)
Description
Completion of questionnaire
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00020910.jpg
This document is a transcript page (p. 84 of 221) dated February 28, 2023, related to Case 22-1426 (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal). It captures a 'voir dire' or post-trial hearing where a witness (implied to be a juror) is being questioned by a judge ('Your Honor') about their attention span during jury selection, potential distractions regarding an 'ex,' and their decision to give press interviews about being a sexual abuse victim. The witness defends their accuracy in answering questionnaires and explains they did not believe their interview would garner significant news attention or alert their family to their abuse history.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Firm partner meetings.
2009-01-01 • RRA Firm
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
A witness was personally served by a process server and handed contact information.
Date unknown
A deposition where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness who is represented by Mr. Leopold.
2017-07-26 • Unknown
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination regarding Jeffrey Epstein's wealth and bank accounts at JP Morgan, including discussion of Government Exhibit 504.
2022-08-10
A witness was on the stand for cross-examination and began to clarify details about moving to a second address in Palm Beach as a teenager.
Date unknown • Courtroom
The document provides instructions for a jury regarding witness testimony during 'this trial' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Date unknown • Southern District
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event