The Court provided instructions to Juror No. 50 (and other potential jurors) on how to complete a questionnaire and assured them of privacy.
The document alleges that Juror No. 50 contradicted his statement to the Court during voir dire, where he claimed to have deleted his Instagram account, by later posting on that same account.
The document alleges that Juror No. 50 admitted he wasn't truthful with the Court during the jury selection process.
The document alleges that Juror No. 50 was not truthful with the Court on his jury questionnaire.
The Court conducted the voir dire of Juror No. 50 and is criticized for not asking certain questions about potential bias.
The document states that "Juror No. 50’s admissions that he wasn’t truthful with the Court."
Judge questioning potential juror.
DOJ-OGR-00009019.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, alleges juror misconduct in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It claims that Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury questionnaires by denying they had ever been victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment. The document sets up a section to discuss Juror No. 50's admissions of untruthfulness to the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00009015.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, discusses the jury selection process for Ms. Maxwell's trial, specifically focusing on Juror No. 50. The defense argues that the Court's questioning of this juror, who had a history of abuse but answered 'no' to related questions, was insufficient to determine if he could be fair and impartial. The document suggests the Court failed to probe potential biases that could affect the evaluation of Ms. Maxwell's defense.
DOJ-OGR-00009710.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, alleges juror misconduct. It claims that Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury questionnaires by denying they had been victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment. The document contrasts this with the other alternate and deliberating jurors, none of whom disclosed such a history.
DOJ-OGR-00009048.jpg
This legal document argues that 'Juror No. 50' is not credible. It cites a nonsensical explanation the juror gave to a Daily Mail reporter for a false answer on a questionnaire. The document further refutes the juror's claim that he 'flew through' the questionnaire by highlighting the Court's explicit instructions for careful and truthful completion.
DOJ-OGR-00009718.jpg
This legal document presents evidence of potential juror misconduct in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It includes a screenshot of a deleted tweet, allegedly from Juror No. 50, to a witness/victim (@anniefarmer), stating her story was critical to the jury's verdict. The document further alleges that this juror posted about his jury service on Instagram in early January 2022, despite having told the Court during voir dire that he had deleted his account.
DOJ-OGR-00009003.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. The filing argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct, focusing on "Juror No. 50," who allegedly was untruthful during jury selection and later gave interviews to media outlets like The Independent, Daily Mail, and Reuters. The document also notes that a second juror disclosed during deliberations that they had been a victim of sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00009795.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) recording the voir dire process. The Court is questioning Juror No. 50, a 35-year-old Manhattan resident who works as an executive assistant in finance and has held that role since graduating college in 2008.
Entities connected to both Juror No. 50 and The Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship