Relationship Details

This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article from April 2019, filed as a court exhibit in Case 1:19-cv-03377. It details the post-Epstein lives of key figures including Sarah Kellen (now married to NASCAR driver Brian Vickers), Ghislaine Maxwell (who founded TerraMar), Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew. It specifically notes Kellen's alleged role in scheduling sexual massages for underage girls, Maxwell's rebranding as an environmentalist, and a $24,000 loan from Epstein to Sarah Ferguson.

This document is page 2 of a Daily Beast article from July 2010 detailing the operations of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. It discusses the complicity of his staff (Kellen, Ross, Groff, Marcinkova, and Maxwell), the settlements paid to victims, and the testimony of house manager Alfredo Rodriguez regarding police corruption and the daily operations of the abuse. It also highlights Epstein's financial ties to the Palm Beach Police Department and his alleged racketeering partnership with modeling agent Jean Luc Brunel.

This document details legal obstruction in the Epstein case, specifically concerning Jean Luc Brunel, who evaded a deposition by falsely claiming to be in France while actually staying at Epstein's West Palm Beach home. It further alleges that Epstein paid for the legal representation of a vast network of associates—including pilots, house staff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and his brother—making it nearly impossible for plaintiffs to secure independent testimony.

This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, sworn by Detective Joe Recarey on May 1, 2006. It details the testimony of a witness (whose name was found in trash pulls from Epstein's home) who began visiting Epstein's residence in 2002 at age 16. The witness describes being recruited by a classmate, meeting Sarah Kellen, and engaging in escalating sexual acts with Epstein and his associate Nada Marcinkova for money.

This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It lists specific interactions Jane Doe had with Epstein's associates between 1994 and 1999, identifying Ghislaine Maxwell, Juan Alessi, Darren Indyke, Adam Perry Lang, Lesley Groff, Mark Epstein, and Sarah Kellen. The response details roles these individuals played, ranging from facilitating abuse and meetings to providing transportation and making threatening financial demands.

This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.

This document is an October 2008 court order granting a motion to remand the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen' back to state court. The federal judge ruled that the plaintiff had valid state-law claims (civil conspiracy, etc.) against defendant Haley Robson, a Florida resident, meaning her inclusion in the lawsuit was not 'fraudulent joinder' intended solely to defeat federal diversity jurisdiction. The order details the plaintiff's allegations that Robson recruited her at age 14 from Loxahatchee, Kellen managed the encounter, and Epstein sexually abused her at his Palm Beach mansion.

This document is the Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss in a civil case. The Plaintiff argues that the federal court has jurisdiction alongside state claims, that the 2006 amendments to 18 U.S.C. §2255 regarding damages should apply retroactively or are procedural, and that interstate commerce requirements were met via phone calls made by co-defendant Sarah Kellen from a New York number. The document details specific dates of solicitation between 2003 and 2005 and alleges a conspiracy involving Epstein, Kellen, and Haley Robson to procure minors for prostitution.

This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.

Affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards in Case 10-81111 detailing obstruction tactics by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. The document asserts that Jean Luc Brunel visited Epstein 67 times in jail and that both Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. It explicitly lists Epstein's inner circle (including pilots and household staff like Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova) and notes that Epstein paid for their legal counsel to control their testimony.

This incident report details an ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for unlawful sexual activity and lewd and lascivious molestation, including witness interviews, Grand Jury postponements, and a plea deal offer. It highlights attempts to intimidate victims and the process of preparing arrest warrants for Epstein and his associates. The document also mentions the involvement of various legal entities and individuals in the case.

This document is an Omnibus Order from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida dated February 4, 2010, in the civil case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate Judge rules on the Plaintiff's motions to compel answers to interrogatories, admissions, and production requests. The court upholds Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination regarding questions about his financial history, assets, and potential witnesses, but orders him to produce documents that are already known to the government (tax returns, passport, and documents provided to him during plea negotiations), ruling that these fall under the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine.

This affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards details difficulties in discovery for a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 10-81111). It alleges that key witnesses Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. Crucially, it lists specific individuals for whom Epstein paid legal fees to prevent them from testifying against him, explicitly labeling Sarah Kellen as a 'procurer of girls' and Nadia Marcinkova as a 'live-in sex slave', while also identifying his personal pilots and household staff.

This document contains the deposition transcript of 'Jane Doe' (a minor victim) dated February 20, 2008, and a Civil Complaint filed by her mother against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The deposition covers Jane Doe's family issues, credibility, drug use allegations, and interactions with law enforcement, while the Complaint details the 'scheme' wherein Robson recruited underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages. The document also includes procedural filings regarding service of process on Haley Robson.

This newspaper article from February 28, 2019, details the sexual abuse committed by Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on the testimony of Michelle Licata and the controversial non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the efforts of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiner and Detective Joseph Recarey to pursue the case despite pressure, and the role of Epstein's high-profile legal team, including Alan Dershowitz and then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, in securing a lenient deal. The article also touches on the defense's tactics to discredit victims and the broader context of Epstein's influence given his wealth and connections.

This document is page 2 of a civil legal complaint detailing factual allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. It describes Epstein as a wealthy financier with a preference for minor girls and alleges a scheme involving Kellen and Haley Robson recruiting disadvantaged minors for sexual acts disguised as massages in Palm Beach, Florida, New York, and Little St. James. The document specifically mentions a victim, 'Jane Doe', who was 14 years old in 2005.

This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details the investigation into a burglary at Jeffrey Epstein's residence on October 6, 2003. Detectives met with Epstein's assistant Sarah Kellen to retrieve surveillance footage showing a male suspect inside the home. The investigation led police to the Towers Condominium to locate a suspect named Alessi, though the building manager claimed the surveillance system there was broken during the relevant timeframe.

This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated September 20, 2005, details an interview with a woman named Robson. Robson describes her own experience giving a massage to Jeffrey Epstein, during which he made unwanted sexual advances, and how he subsequently paid her $200 to recruit other girls for him. The document focuses on Robson recruiting a specific victim, detailing the arrangements made with Epstein's assistant, Sarah Kellen, the transportation of the victim to Epstein's house, and the payments made to both Robson and the victim.

This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is arguing to admit a prior document for 'impeachment by omission,' stating that the witness (Carolyn) filed a complaint and was interviewed by the FBI in 2008 regarding sexual abuse by Epstein and his employee Sarah Kellen, but notably failed to mention Ghislaine Maxwell at that time. Pagliuca argues this contradicts the government's current narrative which emphasizes Maxwell's role while downplaying Kellen's.

This article details the friction between the Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office during the initial investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in 2006. It outlines the police department's desire for harsher charges against Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and associate 'Robson,' contrasting this with the prosecutors' pursuit of a plea deal and the eventual lesser grand jury indictment for solicitation. The document also notes the return of political donations by police and New York politicians, and defense attorney Jack Goldberger's strategy of attacking the credibility of the victims.

This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Sarah Kellen became Jeffrey Epstein's primary assistant in late 2001. It details her responsibilities, which included coordinating flight schedules with Larry Visoski and arranging luggage transfers to and from various residences.

This document is a legal filing (page 18 of a brief filed 06/15/22) arguing against an 'aggravating role enhancement' for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. The text contends that Maxwell did not supervise Sarah Kellen, citing testimony from Juan Alessi and 'Carolyn' that Kellen independently took over scheduling duties at the Palm Beach residence. It further notes Maxwell's separation from Epstein and her subsequent relationship with Ted Waitt.

This document is page 22 of a legal filing (likely a motion) detailing attorney Edwards' attempts to depose Jeffrey Epstein and his associates in 2010. It highlights that Epstein refused to answer questions on advice of counsel, and that associates Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and Adriana Mucinska Ross all invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination regarding the procuring of young girls. The document specifically notes that Bruce Reinhart represented Sarah Kellen during her deposition.

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 22, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that Sarah Kellen was a 'criminal participant' subordinate to Maxwell in the conspiracy hierarchy, taking over tasks like scheduling victims so that Maxwell could move higher up in the leadership structure. The Judge questions the specific evidence proving Maxwell's supervision over Kellen.

This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department dated May 1, 2006, charging Haley Robson with lewd and lascivious acts on a child. It details an investigation revealing that Robson recruited minors, including a 14-year-old named 'SG,' to perform massages for Jeffrey Epstein at his Palm Beach residence, which escalated to sexual acts. The document outlines the recruitment process, the role of Sarah Kellen, and specific incidents involving victim SG in February 2005.

This page from a legal filing details the systematic recruitment of economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee, FL, by Ms. Robson for Jeffrey Epstein. It describes the procedure upon arrival at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, where victims were processed by assistant Sarah Kellen and led to a massage room before being subjected to sexual acts by Epstein. The document highlights that victims were targeted specifically because they were perceived as unlikely to complain to authorities.

This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department details evidence found during a search of Jeffrey Epstein's home, including photos of naked girls, massage tables, covert cameras, and message books with entries about procuring girls recorded by Sarah Kellen. It also recounts a sworn statement from a victim, 'ML' (age 16 at the time), who was recruited by 'YL' to provide massages for money and describes the interior of the home and her interaction with Epstein and his assistant.

This document is page 31 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 25, 2022. It argues against a defense claim of 'multiplicity' regarding conspiracy counts, referencing trial testimony from a victim named Carolyn. The text highlights that Sarah Kellen, Epstein's personal assistant since the early 2000s, contacted Carolyn to schedule appointments for sexualized massages.

This document is a scanned book excerpt (Chapter 54, page 204) marked with a House Oversight footer, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration between 2008 and 2009. It contrasts Epstein's jail privileges with those of millionaire John Goodman, specifically highlighting the high frequency of personal visitors Epstein received, including Nadia Marcinkova (over 70 times), his assistant Sarah Kellen, and MMA fighter Igor Zinoviev. The text also references Sheriff Ric Bradshaw's defense of the jail conditions and includes fragmented text on the opposing page mentioning US Attorney Acosta and the irregular nature of Epstein's government agreement.

This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department dated May 1, 2006, charging Haley Robson with Lewd and Lascivious Acts on a child. It details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Robson, alleging that Robson recruited underage victims (including a 14-year-old identified as 'SG') from Royal Palm Beach High School to perform massages for Epstein at his residence, which resulted in sexual battery. The affidavit describes specific sexual acts, the payment structure for victims, and Robson's role in coaching victims regarding their age.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely pilot David Rodgers). The questioning focuses on the role of Sarah Kellen in late 2001, specifically whether she was acting as an assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or both. The witness confirms Kellen worked for both but expresses uncertainty about whether she was Epstein's 'primary' assistant at that specific time.