Relationship Details

This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') summarizing police evidence against Jeffrey Epstein. It details testimony from employee 'Rodriguez' regarding cleaning sex toys after massages, renting cars for high school girls, and delivering roses to a high school. It also discusses the subpoena of Sarah Kellen's phone records, which corroborated victim accounts of when encounters occurred.

This document is an evidence photograph showing a shelf of black three-ring binders labeled with various names, locations, and events spanning roughly 2002-2007. The labels reference Jeffrey Epstein ('JE'), Little St. James ('LSJ'), Zorro Ranch ('Zorro'), and Palm Beach ('PB'), along with associates like Jean Luc Brunel, Walter Cronkite, and possibly Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). Several labels explicitly mention 'girls', 'nudes', 'kids', and 'chix', suggesting the binders contain photographic evidence related to Epstein's trafficking activities.

This document is an excerpt from Chapter 18 of the book 'Filthy Rich' (marked as a House Oversight exhibit), detailing a police raid on Jeffrey Epstein's home. The text describes incriminating evidence found, including a pink-and-green couch identified by victims, photos of naked girls (including one named Wendy), and notes signed by Sarah Kellen regarding procuring girls. It also details the discovery of sexual paraphernalia, 'SlaveCraft' books, and secret cameras hidden in clocks—cameras the police knew about because they helped install them during a 2004 theft investigation involving handyman Juan Alessi.

This document is a Plaintiff's Motion for Default filed on June 12, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida against Sarah Kellen in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The motion asserts that Kellen has been avoiding service but was successfully served according to New York law and failed to respond. Notably, it alleges that Kellen is aware of the legal action and has visited Jeffrey Epstein at the Palm Beach County Jail on several occasions.

This document is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Southern District of Florida for the case Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein. It details multiple attempts by process server Joseph Sanchez in April 2009 to serve Sarah Kellen (a/k/a Sarah Bonk) at her New York apartment. After several failed attempts where the doorman stated she was out of town or not home, service was eventually effected on April 25, 2009, by leaving the papers with the doorman, identified as Hector 'Doe', followed by a mailed copy.

This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.

This document contains pages 80 and 281 from the book 'Filthy Rich', submitted as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. Page 281 details Sarah Kellen's activities in 2009, including renting a Palm Beach bungalow under the alias 'Clara' for $4,000/month and taking a round-the-world trip. It also discusses the non-prosecution agreement, noting that prosecutors considered charging Kellen, Wendy Dobbs, and Nadia Marcinkova, but Epstein's plea deal protected them, with the narrative suggesting Epstein could have pleaded to assaulting Kellen on his jet to avoid sex crime charges.

This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich,' stamped as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text details the contentious legal battle between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney [Brad] Edwards, describing Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards as a desperate attempt by a 'serial pedophile' to silence victims' advocates. It also discusses Sarah Kellen using the alias 'Clara' to rent property in Palm Beach in April 2009 and mentions prosecutors considering Kellen and Marcinkova as potential co-conspirators.

This document appears to be an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (Chapter 19) referencing a Probable Cause Affidavit and interviews with former Epstein staff members Jose Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. Alessi describes cleaning sex toys after massages, while Rodriguez details the routine of young girls arriving for massages and being managed by Sarah Kellen. Rodriguez explicitly notes the girls appeared 'too young' and mentions delivering roses to a high school under Epstein's direction.

This document is a Motion for Stay filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in a civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe. They argue that a stay is mandatory under federal law because of a pending federal criminal investigation/action (the deferred prosecution agreement). Attached is a declaration from AUSA A. Marie Villafana detailing the government's interaction with victims (T.M., C.W., S.R.) and providing copies of notification letters sent to them and their attorneys regarding their rights and the non-prosecution agreement.

This is a legal reply filed by Sarah Kellen's attorney in July 2009, requesting the court set aside a default judgment in the case brought by Jane Doe II. The document argues that service of process in New York was legally deficient because the 'nail and mail' method was used without proper due diligence (attempts were made when Kellen was known to be out of town) and that the default was entered prematurely before the response deadline. Kellen also asserts a meritorious defense, stating she did not conspire with Jeffrey Epstein to commit sexual battery and was unaware of what occurred privately between Epstein and the Plaintiff.

This document, likely an affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards from the House Oversight production, details Epstein's obstruction of justice and evidence collection by the Palm Beach Police. It describes an incident where Epstein diverted his private plane to the US Virgin Islands to prevent the FBI from serving a subpoena to Nadia Marcinkova, while simultaneously harassing her and Sarah Kellen to ensure their silence. It also details the Palm Beach Police investigation in late 2005, including a trash pull that revealed Epstein purchased books on sexual slavery and training (e.g., 'SlaveCraft' and 'Training with Miss Abernathy') via Amazon.

This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details surveillance and investigation activities in April 2005 regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1-05-000368). Officers documented voicemails from Haley Robson arranging transport for a female to Epstein's house, conducted trash pulls at 358 El Brillo revealing flight logs (N908JE) and notes with names of associates like Sarah Kellen and potential victims, and investigated a minor student named Zachary Brian at Summit Christian School. The report also documents subpoena attempts for phone records and coordination with the FBI (SA Mighdoll).

This document is page 113 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Carolyn testifies that Sarah Kellen called her on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, offering $500-$600 to take nude photographs of her at the Palm Beach house. Carolyn also describes massage appointments where she would undress and massage Epstein for approximately 45 minutes.

This document is a flight log page from March and April 2004 detailing flights on aircraft N909JE and N908JE, as well as simulator training. The logs record Jeffrey Epstein (JE) traveling frequently between Palm Beach, New York, Bedford, and St. Thomas with various associates. Notable passengers explicitly named include former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, hedge fund manager Glen Dubin and his wife Eva, and Epstein's brother Mark Epstein. The initials 'GM' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), 'SK' (Sarah Kellen), and 'VC' appear frequently, alongside several redacted names.

This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight files. It details the fallout of Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the British Royal Family around March 2011, specifically focusing on Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson. It describes Ferguson admitting Epstein paid £78,000 of her debt, resulting in a public scandal, and recounts the deposition of Epstein associates Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova, who invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about Prince Andrew.

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing arguments in a criminal case. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, asserts that the defendant held a leadership role over Sarah Kellen, citing flight records showing they both traveled on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet during the same period. The defense, represented by Mr. Everdell, begins to challenge the prosecution's legal interpretation regarding the need to prove supervision of another criminal participant.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa identifies Sarah Kellen in a photograph (Government's Exhibit 327) and testifies that Kellen arrived towards the end of Espinosa's employment, specifically between 2000 and 2002. Espinosa states she did not know Kellen's specific job title but observed that Kellen accompanied Jeffrey Epstein to his properties and was essentially always where he was.

This document appears to be pages 238-239 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It details the media fallout and legal questioning surrounding Prince Andrew's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein around 2011. Specifically, it documents Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova invoking the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual misconduct involving Prince Andrew and underage girls, and lists numerous scandalous headlines from the British press regarding Andrew's demotion as trade envoy.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 31, labeled SA-400) filed on 06/29/2023. It details legal arguments regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's leadership role in the conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Moe (government) argues that Maxwell acted as the 'lady of the house' and supervised Sarah Kellen, while Mr. Everdell (defense) disputes the government's interpretation of case law regarding the supervision of other criminal participants.

This document is page 151 of a court transcript containing the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that Maxwell was not involved with the accuser 'Kate' in New York and that regarding 'Carolyn' and the Palm Beach property, mere presence or management duties do not constitute conspiracy or sex trafficking. The defense emphasizes the lack of physical evidence (message pads, phone records) linking Maxwell to orchestrating massages and notes that Sarah Kellen was present at the property.

This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 204-205), marked as a House Oversight exhibit. It details the preferential and 'highly irregular' treatment Jeffrey Epstein received while incarcerated at the Stockade between 2008 and 2009, contrasting it with other inmates like John Goodman. The text highlights US Attorney Alexander Acosta's admission that the state custody arrangement undermined the purpose of the jail sentence, and notes that taxpayers subsidized Epstein's stay.

This document contains pages 188-189 from the book 'Filthy Rich', presented as a House Oversight exhibit. It details the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein on September 24, 2007, which protected him from a 57-count federal indictment. The text highlights the secrecy of the deal, the high-profile legal team (including Ken Starr and Roy Black), the immunity granted to co-conspirators like Sarah Kellen, and the fact that victims were neither consulted nor notified.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell held a leadership role ('lady of the house') over Sarah Kellen, citing flight records to prove they were close associates of Jeffrey Epstein simultaneously. The defense attorney (Mr. Everdell) disputes the government's legal interpretation regarding the supervision of criminal participants.

A page from a transcript where a speaker, identified as a former federal prosecutor and judge, discusses drawing adverse inferences because three women—Sarah Kellen, Miss Mucinska, and Miss Marcinkova—invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Alan Dershowitz. The speaker identifies Jeffrey Epstein as the 'kingpin' of an 'international sex trafficking organization' and notes that these three women, described as the 'next echelon,' were covered by a 'highly unusual' nonprosecution agreement.