Relationship Details
Connected Entities
Evidence
The document is a transcript of a formal legal questioning of a witness (Brune) by a questioner (likely an attorney).
The document shows an adversarial questioning relationship typical of a court proceeding, where the questioner is challenging the witness's (Brune's) previous statements and actions.
The document shows an adversarial questioning relationship typical of a court proceeding, where the questioner is challenging the witness's (Brune's) previous statements and actions.
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00010037.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated March 23, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning centers on a previous statement made by Ms. Trzaskoma to the court, where she offered to submit a letter about newly discovered facts. The questioner probes whether a specific 'Westlaw report' was one of these facts.
DOJ-OGR-00010033.jpg
This document is a court transcript from March 24, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on a legal brief, revealing that it omitted key information about a 'suspension opinion' and contained inaccuracies regarding the catalyst for an investigation, which was allegedly a letter from a Ms. Conrad. The transcript suggests that another individual, Ms. Trzaskoma, was responsible for drafting the facts in the brief.
Mutual Connections
Entities connected to both Questioner and Brune
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship