Relationship Details

Questioner Professional Rocchio

Connected Entities

Entity A
Questioner
Type: person
Mentions: 37
Also known as: Audience / Questioner
Entity B
Rocchio
Type: person
Mentions: 289

Evidence

The document is a transcript of a formal cross-examination where an attorney (Questioner) is questioning a witness (Rocchio) in a legal proceeding.

The document is a transcript of a cross-examination, an adversarial legal proceeding where the questioner (likely an attorney) is challenging the testimony of the witness (Rocchio).

The document is a transcript of a formal cross-examination, where an attorney (Questioner) is questioning a witness (Rocchio) in a legal setting.

Source Documents (3)

DOJ-OGR-00015027.jpg

Unknown type • 562 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the witness's testimony regarding childhood abuse reporting rates, specifically challenging their conclusions by analyzing the statistics from the "Alaggia study, 2010". The witness defends their position by interpreting the study's data to show that a majority (58%) of victims did not disclose abuse.

DOJ-OGR-00015001.jpg

Unknown type • 524 KB
View

This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on January 15, 2025. The questioning centers on a study about "predatory alienation," a term the questioner asserts was created by an advocacy group. Rocchio clarifies that the study is qualitative rather than subjective, while the questioner probes its methodology and origins.

DOJ-OGR-00015010.jpg

Unknown type • 565 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. An attorney questions Rocchio about the scientific validity and testing of a sexual grooming model (SGM), referencing the model's authors' calls for more rigorous testing. The attorney also brings up an article by Bennett and O'Donohue to suggest a lack of scientific consensus on the definition of grooming.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both Questioner and Rocchio

MS. POMERANTZ (person)

Questioner's Other Relationships

Professional Brune
Strength: 7/10 View
Legal representative JANE
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative Answerer
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative Mr. Everdell
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative Ms. Maxwell
Strength: 6/10 View

Rocchio's Other Relationships

Professional Unnamed Questioner
Strength: 10/10 View
Legal representative MR. PAGLIUCA
Strength: 9/10 View
Professional MR. PAGLIUCA
Strength: 9/10 View
Legal representative Attorney (Q)
Strength: 8/10 View
Legal representative The Court
Strength: 8/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
7/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:41
Last Updated
2025-11-20 17:09

Entity Network Stats

Questioner 24 relationships
Rocchio 58 relationships
Mutual connections 1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship