The document is a transcript of a formal cross-examination where an attorney (Questioner) is questioning a witness (Rocchio) in a legal proceeding.
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination, an adversarial legal proceeding where the questioner (likely an attorney) is challenging the testimony of the witness (Rocchio).
The document is a transcript of a formal cross-examination, where an attorney (Questioner) is questioning a witness (Rocchio) in a legal setting.
DOJ-OGR-00015027.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the witness's testimony regarding childhood abuse reporting rates, specifically challenging their conclusions by analyzing the statistics from the "Alaggia study, 2010". The witness defends their position by interpreting the study's data to show that a majority (58%) of victims did not disclose abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00015001.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on January 15, 2025. The questioning centers on a study about "predatory alienation," a term the questioner asserts was created by an advocacy group. Rocchio clarifies that the study is qualitative rather than subjective, while the questioner probes its methodology and origins.
DOJ-OGR-00015010.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. An attorney questions Rocchio about the scientific validity and testing of a sexual grooming model (SGM), referencing the model's authors' calls for more rigorous testing. The attorney also brings up an article by Bennett and O'Donohue to suggest a lack of scientific consensus on the definition of grooming.
Entities connected to both Questioner and Rocchio
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship