Relationship Details

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion by Plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 101 and 102) to preserve evidence in their cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically including flight logs ('travel in Defendant's private airplanes'), phone records, computer data since 1998, financial records regarding payments to victims, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly forbids the destruction, deletion, or alteration of any such evidence.

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida (Exhibit A), signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra, granting a motion to preserve evidence in multiple civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. The order mandates that Epstein and his agents preserve a wide range of materials, specifically including records of domestic and international travel on private airplanes, phone communications, computer data, and items resulting from the October 25, 2005 search of his Palm Beach home. It establishes preservation timelines ranging from 1998 to 2005 depending on the specific plaintiff and defines sanctions for wrongful destruction of evidence.

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida, dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion to preserve evidence in multiple civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein and his associates to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically highlighting records of domestic and international travel (including private airplanes), phone communications, financial records, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly prohibits the destruction, alteration, or deletion of potential evidence dating back to 1998.

This document is an unopposed motion filed on June 18, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-80656) by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Epstein requests an extension until July 5, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 102, citing the workload from multiple concurrent cases where he is a defendant. The document confirms that Plaintiff's counsel agreed to this extension and lists the legal representatives for both parties.

This document is an 'Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time' filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein on November 16, 2009. The motion requests an extension until November 27, 2009, for Epstein to respond to the complaint, citing that the parties are working together and are 'close to a resolution' of the case. The document includes a certificate of service listing the attorneys involved for both the plaintiff (Podhurst Orseck, P.A.) and the defendant (Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. and Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman).

This document is a legal reply filed on May 29, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida, arguing for the right to proceed anonymously in their lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs contend that Epstein aims to reveal their identities to harass and intimidate them, and they cite various legal precedents and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to support their request for privacy due to the sexual nature of the crimes committed against them as minors. The document also includes a service list detailing the attorneys representing various parties in related cases against Epstein.

This document is a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal submitted on May 29, 2009, by attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs request permission to file their response to Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal, or alternatively, request the court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) so they can adequately respond. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing attorneys representing Epstein, co-defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and various other Jane Doe plaintiffs.

This document is a Final Order of Dismissal from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case with prejudice on December 8, 2009, following a stipulation filed by the parties on December 7, 2009. The order notes that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.

This document is an Order of Transfer from the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, dated May 2009. Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp transfers the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Kenneth A. Marra because it is related to multiple other actions pending before Judge Marra against Epstein. Judge Marra formally accepts the transfer on the second page.

This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated August 7, 2009. Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a deadline of October 15, 2009, for him to file a responsive pleading to the complaint of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 102.

A court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of July 5, 2009, for him to file a responsive pleading to the complaint.

This document is a court order (likely a proposed order attached to a motion) from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order grants Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of October 30, 2009, for him to file a responsive pleading to the plaintiff's complaint.

A court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants the defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a deadline of December 15, 2009, for Epstein to file a responsive pleading to the complaint.