Relationship Details

This document is page 25 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their contact with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questioning style, noting the presence of a child, while Mr. Tein asks if the witness was persuaded to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money and about specific methods of communication, which the witness denies.

This document is page 75 of a deposition transcript, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012470'. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about whether their family members (mother and mother's husband, Paul) or another redacted individual have spoken to or received money from reporters, which the witness denies. Mr. Tein then attempts to refresh the witness's memory by mentioning a past event where 'she' was arrested for drugs.

This document is page 55 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The questioning covers an altercation at a restaurant involving Mr. Epstein's process servers and the police, as well as the witness's decision to delete their MySpace page just days before the deposition. The witness denies the attorney's allegations about the restaurant incident but confirms the timing of the MySpace deletion.

This document is a deposition transcript excerpt where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, admits to intentionally lying to Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms they pretended to be 18 when they were not and also lied about which school they attended. The document contains two redactions, likely obscuring the name of the school, and notes an objection from another attorney, Mr. Leopold.

This document is page 37 of a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about events following a visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house. The witness denies spending money received there but admits to going to a Marshall's store with two other girls, where one of them bought a purse. The questioning concludes by asking the witness about conversations with federal prosecutors regarding financial reimbursement.

This document is page 31 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a prior statement she made to a Detective Pagan, in which she allegedly described lying about her age to Jeffrey Epstein by saying it "really fast." The witness's attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Ms. Belohlavek, repeatedly object to the line of questioning.

This document is a deposition transcript excerpt, likely from September 29, 2004, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about evading service of process from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness is accused of having an associate named Justin lie on their behalf and of requiring police intervention to be served at a restaurant. The transcript captures the witness's denials, legal objections by their counsel, Mr. Leopold, and sparring between the two attorneys.

This document is page 16 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a female witness about a message she sent on MySpace. The questioning becomes contentious when Mr. Tein asks if the witness finds a racial slur offensive, implying she used it, which the witness denies. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, leading to procedural arguments between the lawyers.

This document is page 59 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace page. The witness confirms the page is theirs and admits to having lied about their age, stating they were 18, because of a rule on the platform that required users to be that age to post.

This document is a transcript of a legal deposition where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies on the witness's MySpace profiles, specifically their stated age (18 vs. 19) and the timing of an age change made just four days before a scheduled Grand Jury testimony. The witness admits to lying about their age to use the platform but claims not to know what the questioner is talking about regarding the suspicious timing.

This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, likely dated September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about whether they were induced by anyone to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money, which the witness denies. The transcript captures a contentious exchange between Mr. Tein and the witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, whom Mr. Tein repeatedly accuses of coaching the witness.

This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.

This document is a fragment of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects and instructs the witness not to answer questions if their knowledge comes from their private conversations, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness denies having knowledge of the lawsuit from any other source.

This document is a transcript from a deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning focuses on a scheduling conflict where the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, was unable to start the deposition that morning due to a court appearance. The witness is also asked if they have listened to a prior tape-recorded statement they gave to the police.

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit recently filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects, citing attorney-client privilege and instructing his client not to answer if their knowledge comes only from their protected conversations. The exchange becomes tense, with Mr. Leopold mistakenly calling the questioning attorney 'Lewis'.

This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.

This document is page 56 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about deleting their MySpace page after receiving a subpoena. The witness confirms the deletion but claims it was a regular habit, not an attempt to hide information. Mr. Tein then accuses the witness of frequently lying about their age, which the witness denies, while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questions.

This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or testimony where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, likely drove them to a Grand Jury testimony when they were 14 or 15. The witness also admits to lying on their MySpace page about their income, claiming 'as a joke' to have made a quarter-million dollars a year.