Epstein forwarded advice to Weinberg, who replied with a message marked 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'.
Epstein forwarded advice to Weinberg, who replied with the subject 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'.
Epstein forwarded advice to Weinberg, who replied with the subject 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'.
David Pegg's email states, '...Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.'
David Pegg's email states, '...Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.'
David Pegg's email states, '...Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.'
David Pegg's email to Martin G. Weinberg explicitly states, 'Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.'
David Pegg's email to Martin G. Weinberg states, '...Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.'
David Pegg's email to Martin G. Weinberg states, '...Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.'
David Pegg's email to Martin Weinberg states, '...Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.'
In an email to Weinberg, David Pegg refers to 'Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client'.
In an email to Weinberg, David Pegg refers to 'Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client'.
Weinberg is listed as the designee/attorney to receive Epstein's FBI records.
Weinberg is listed as the designee/attorney to receive Epstein's FBI records.
described as 'Epstein’s current attorney'
Weinberg is writing on behalf of the 'pending Epstein request'.
Martin G. Weinberg is listed as 'Attorneys for Defendant'.
Subject line 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE' and exchange of legal documents.
Weinberg writes 'we take no position on behalf of Mr Epstein.'
Described as 'Epstein’s current attorney'
Listed under 'By His Attorneys'
Weinberg is filing the appeal on behalf of Epstein regarding his FOIA request.
Text states 'Martin G. Weinberg, an attorney for Epstein'
Listed as Attorney for Defendant
Weinberg signed the letter defending Epstein as one of his attorneys.
Letter states: 'I represent Jeffrey Epstein.'
described as 'Epstein’s current attorney'
Notice of Appearance filed by Weinberg for Epstein
Weinberg moves to appear as co-counsel for Jeffrey Epstein.
Listed under 'Respectfully Submitted, Jeffrey Epstein By His Attorneys'
Weinberg writing on behalf of Epstein regarding privileged communications and dismissal.
Weinberg writes on behalf of Epstein's family concerning Epstein's death.
Weinberg sending preservation request on behalf of Epstein's family.
Listed as 'Counsel to Defendant- Appellant Jeffrey Epstein'
Weinberg signs as attorney for Epstein.
Letterhead and signature block indicating representation
Letter addressed to Weinberg regarding United States v. Jeffrey Epstein.
Weinberg signs 'on behalf of the Epstein defense team'.
Document lists Weinberg as attorney for defendant Epstein.
Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear as co- counsel for Jeffrey Epstein
Listed as counsel on filing.
Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear as co- counsel for Jeffrey Epstein
Listed as Attorney for Defendant
Self-identified as 'prior criminal defense attorneys for Mr Epstein'
Attorney for Defendant
EFTA00019067.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 10-11, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death. It culminates in a formal letter from attorney Martin Weinberg to government officials and the MCC, requesting the preservation of all evidence related to Epstein's detention, his July 23 suicide attempt, and his death on August 10. Specific requests include video footage, visitor logs, medical records, and notes found in the cell. The chain also includes earlier emails from government officials confirming the initiation of FBI and Attorney General investigations.
EFTA00019667.pdf
A legal stipulation filed on August 20, 2019, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 19-2221-cr). Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein and the United States agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42, with no costs or fees recoverable by either party. This document effectively ends the specific appellate case mentioned, likely following Epstein's death earlier that month (though death is not explicitly cited in the text).
EFTA00019994.pdf
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on August 27, 2019, concerning the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death on August 10, 2019. Judge Richard M. Berman presides over the hearing, emphasizing the importance of transparency and victim involvement despite the defendant's death. The proceedings cover appearances by attorneys for both the government and the defense, and the judge's rationale for holding a public hearing on the matter.
EFTA00027975.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin G. Weinberg) shortly after Epstein's death in August 2019. Weinberg requests a 'taint team' protocol for computers seized from Epstein's Virgin Islands residence to protect attorney-client privilege, similar to protocols used for previous seizures in NYC. He also inquires about the timing of the dismissal of charges (nolle prosequi) and indicates the defense team wishes to speak with investigators regarding Epstein's death. Additionally, the emails note that Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, is represented by Stacey Richman.
EFTA00028985.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on July 11, 2019, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys requesting permission to file his supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The defense argues that under the Bail Reform Act, such financial information should remain confidential to prevent widespread media dissemination given the high-profile nature of the case. The document lists Epstein's legal team, including Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich.
EFTA00036030.pdf
This document contains an email chain initiating from an MCC Supervisory Staff Attorney regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The primary content is a formal legal request from Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, sent on August 11, 2019 (the day after Epstein's death), demanding the preservation of all evidence including video logs, physical evidence (ligatures, notes), and staff logs related to Epstein's death on August 10 and a prior suicide attempt on July 23. The chain also includes the initial notification of death sent by the MCC to Weinberg on August 10.
EFTA00014576.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, Michael Miller) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It supplements a previous discovery request, specifically demanding the preservation and production of documents from the lead prosecutor (name redacted) who investigated Epstein in 2006-2008 in the Southern District of Florida. The request focuses on communications regarding investigations in New York in 2008, a March 2008 trip to New York by said prosecutor, and communications with victim witnesses regarding their rights.
017.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted Pro Hac Vice to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists Weinberg's contact information in Boston, Massachusetts.
042.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on July 31, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings focused on setting a schedule for discovery, motion practice (specifically regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement), and a trial date. The government proposed a June 2020 trial, while the defense requested September 2020 due to the volume of discovery (over a million pages) and the complexity of the case; Judge Berman tentatively set the trial for June 8, 2020.
EFTA00016596.pdf
A formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding discovery requests made in July and August 2019. The government rejects defense requests for broad access to files from other districts (FL, GA) and communications with victims as 'outlandishly overbroad' and a 'fishing expedition' to identify victims, while confirming it will comply with standard legal obligations (Rule 16, Brady). The letter asserts the SDNY investigation was independent of the previous Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031395.jpg
This document appears to be the footer of an email or legal correspondence from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez of The LS Law Firm. It references other legal counsel associated with Jeffrey Epstein (Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger, Martin G. Weinberg) and links to a Miami Herald article. Notably, the legal disclaimer identifies the information as the property of 'JEE' (presumably Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if the message was received in error.
EFTA00027977.pdf
This document is an email exchange from August 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein's former defense attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Weinberg requests permission to view video footage of Epstein's jail cell and the hallway at the MCC from the morning of his death (August 10, 2019). The US Attorney's Office denies the request, stating they cannot share the information at that time due to their ongoing investigation.
EFTA00030518.pdf
An email chain from July 25, 2019, involving defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and others regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. Weinberg confirms his intent to sign a Protective Order on behalf of the defense team and requests information on the timing and format of the first wave of discovery. Subsequent emails discuss internal coordination with individuals named Maurene and Andy to prepare materials before an upcoming conference.
007.pdf
This document is a motion filed on July 11, 2019, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich) requesting the court's permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The defense argues that due to the high profile nature of the case and the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1)), the financial details should remain confidential to prevent them from being disseminated by the news media. The document emphasizes that the financial disclosure is intended solely for bail determination purposes.
013-02.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of USA v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to appear Pro Hac Vice as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists Weinberg's contact information in Boston, MA.
025.pdf
This document is a cover letter filed on July 17, 2019, by attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The letter submits attached documents concerning Epstein's New Mexico registration status to support his bail application, following up on a previous letter dated July 16, 2019. The filing also lists Martin G. Weinberg and Marc Allan Fernich as additional counsel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021676.jpg
This document is an FBI Privacy Waiver and Certification of Identity form signed by Jeffrey E. Epstein on January 5, 2010. In the document, Epstein lists his personal details, including his SSN and Palm Beach address, and authorizes the FBI to release all information relating to him to his attorney, Martin G. Weinberg of Boston. The document was faxed by the FBI ICRC in Winchester, VA on April 16, 2010.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030343.jpg
This document is an email chain from January 30, 2015, initiated by David Pegg, a journalist from The Guardian, to Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Martin G. Weinberg. Pegg is seeking comment from Epstein for an upcoming article and sets a response deadline of February 2, 2015. The subsequent emails between Weinberg and Epstein are included but their content is redacted under attorney-client privilege.
DOJ-OGR-00000387.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a conference held on July 8, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein, with Judge Richard M. Berman presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other officials present, including an FBI agent, an NYPD officer, and two probation officers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031431.jpg
This document appears to be an email fragment or draft containing a quote from a news summary regarding Epstein's defense team (Starr, Goldberger, Sanchez, Weinberg) refuting federal sex trafficking allegations. It includes a link to a Miami Herald article. The footer contains a signature for Lilly Ann Sanchez of The LS Law Firm and a confidentiality disclaimer stating the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Edward Epstein) and directs errors to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031410.jpg
This document appears to be the conclusion of an email sent by attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It quotes a response to a newspaper editorial regarding the Epstein case and Alexander Acosta, asserting there was no evidence of federal sex trafficking offenses. The document includes a strict legal disclaimer noting the content is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs error reports to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
DOJ-OGR-00000511.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript of a conference held on July 15, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, regarding the case *United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein* (19 CR 490). It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Richard M. Berman, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Geoffrey S. Berman) and the defense team (including Reid Weingarten, Martin Weinberg, and others). The document was filed on July 24, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00000832.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on August 5, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Docket No. 19-2221). Attorney Martin G. Weinberg of Boston, MA, certifies his appearance as additional counsel for the Defendant-Appellant, Jeffrey Epstein, joining existing counsel Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 18, 2016, where journalist Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on a public relations strategy to counter an upcoming book by an author named Patterson. Wolff suggests Epstein should publicly become an 'anti-Trump voice' to gain 'political cover' and deflect attention, proposing an op-ed and a TV interview with Charlie Rose. Epstein forwarded this advice to his legal team, including Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Darren Indyke, prompting a reply from Weinberg marking the communication as 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031417.jpg
This document is page 3 of a printed Washington Post article dated February 6, 2019, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It contains a statement from Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, defending the non-prosecution agreement/plea deal as 'fairly negotiated' and reviewed by senior DOJ officials, while asserting Epstein fulfilled all legal obligations for over 10 years.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 2016 involving Jeffrey Epstein and his legal team (Martin Weinberg, Darren Indyke, and Kathy Ruemmler). Epstein shares a link to a LawNewz article regarding a federal judge ordering a hearing in a rape lawsuit against Donald Trump. Martin Weinberg responds with a redacted privileged email containing an attachment with legal revisions ('Revisions to Opp') edited by both himself (MGW) and Indyke (DKI).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031447.jpg
This is a letter dated August 19, 2015, from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to the DOJ's Office of Information Policy, appealing on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein regarding the FBI's slow processing of a FOIA request. Weinberg argues that the FBI is failing to meet its statutory obligations, noting that only two batches of documents have been produced in over two years from a file exceeding 12,000 pages, and projecting that at the current pace, the file won't be fully processed until 2025. The letter references previous correspondence with FBI Liaison Dennis Argall and requests the OIP to compel the FBI to comply promptly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016479.jpg
This document contains an email exchange from January 2019 and December 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, and Jack Browning (likely opposing or media counsel). Weinberg explicitly states that, on behalf of Epstein, they take 'no position' regarding a request to unseal appellate briefs, provided certain identities are redacted. The document includes contact information for Weinberg's Boston law office.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030377.jpg
This document is an email chain from January 30, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards a media inquiry from The Guardian to his lawyer, Martin G. Weinberg. The inquiry, sent by journalist David Pegg, concerns an upcoming article and sets a response deadline, noting that Epstein had not responded to prior contact attempts. The content of the emails between Epstein and his lawyer is redacted and marked as 'Privileged'.
DOJ-OGR-00000361.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on July 15, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorney Martin G. Weinberg requests admission Pro Hac Vice (permission to practice in this specific jurisdiction for this case) to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg confirms his good standing with the Massachusetts Bar and provides his contact information in Boston.
DOJ-OGR-00000326.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal motion filed on July 11, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Weingarten, Weinberg, and Fernich) requested permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal. Judge Richard M. Berman hand-wrote an order on the page granting the motion and requiring the materials be hand-delivered to chambers and opposing counsel by 9:00 AM the following day.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031449.jpg
This is the final page of a legal letter written by attorney Martin G. Weinberg regarding a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request concerning Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg is requesting intervention to expedite the release of a 12,000-page FBI file, complaining that after 28 months, only 700 redacted pages have been released. The letter is copied to James A. Baker, General Counsel of the FBI.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028965.jpg
A legal letter from attorney Martin G. Weinberg, representing Jeffrey Epstein, to John Zucker at ABC's Office of Legal Counsel. Weinberg attempts to dissuade ABC from airing a 'Good Morning America' interview with 'Jane Doe 3,' claiming her accusations are uncorroborated, recycled from 2011 UK tabloids, and were previously dismissed by a federal judge. The letter also notes that an FBI agent declared Jane Doe 3 refused to cooperate with the FBI regarding Epstein in 2007.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030339.jpg
This document is an email chain from January 30, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Martin G. Weinberg, forwards a media enquiry to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The enquiry is from David Pegg, a journalist at The Guardian, who is seeking comment from Epstein for an upcoming article. Pegg sets a response deadline of February 2, 2015, and notes that previous attempts to contact Epstein directly have been unsuccessful.
DOJ-OGR-00000321.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing dated July 11, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). In this motion, Epstein, through his attorneys Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich, requests permission from the court to file his supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The document lists the contact information for the three defense attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018021.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing a printout of a New York Times 'Letter to the Editor' published on March 5, 2019, written by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (including Ken Starr). The attorneys argue that the number of women involved in the investigation was exaggerated, deny the existence of an international sex-trafficking operation or sex parties at his home, and assert that Epstein is entitled to 'finality' regarding his plea deal. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Martin G. Weinberg
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship