HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017922.jpg
2.92 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
10
Organizations
8
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court opinion page
File Size:
2.92 MB
Summary
This page from a court opinion discusses motions to dismiss regarding jurisdiction over Saudi princes and the Rabita Trust in litigation related to the September 11, 2001 attacks. The court grants the motions to dismiss for Prince Salman and Prince Naif due to a lack of minimum contacts with the United States necessary for personal jurisdiction. The document also begins discussing allegations against the Rabita Trust, including its designation as a terrorist entity and alleged ties to al Qaeda.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Prince Salman | ||
| Prince Naif | ||
| Wa'el Julaidan | ||
| Osama bin Laden |
Organizations (10)
Timeline (4 events)
Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
October 12, 2001 designation of Rabita Trust as Specially Designated Global Terrorist Entity
1989 visit to the White House
Raid of BIF's Sarajevo offices
Locations (8)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (4)
→
→
→
→
to
→
→
to
→
→
Key Quotes (4)
"Plaintiffs must make a prima facie showing that Prince Salman and Prince Naif have minimum contacts with the United States."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017922.jpg
Quote #1
"Accordingly, Prince Salman’s and Prince Naif’s motions to dismiss the Ashton, Burnett, and Federal complaints for lack of personal jurisdiction are granted."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017922.jpg
Quote #2
"Rabita Trust is an al Qaeda front"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017922.jpg
Quote #3
"Rabita Trust claims that it does not have an office in the United States and that the complaints are devoid of any allegations that it directed money to terrorists."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017922.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document