HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014088.jpg
1010 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing (conclusion page)
File Size:
1010 KB
Summary
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) dated March 24, 2015, submitted by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell on behalf of Jane Does No. 1-4. The text argues that the Court should deny Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene, citing his conflicting positions regarding the possession and collection of records. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alan Dershowitz | Respondent/Movant |
The filing argues against his motion to intervene and criticizes his conflicting positions regarding records.
|
| Bradley J. Edwards | Attorney |
Attorney signing the document for the plaintiffs.
|
| Paul G. Cassell | Attorney |
Attorney signing the document for the plaintiffs (Pro Hac Vice).
|
| Jane Does No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 | Plaintiffs/Clients |
Represented by Edwards and Cassell.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. |
Firm representing the plaintiffs (Bradley J. Edwards).
|
|
| S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah |
Professional affiliation of Paul G. Cassell.
|
|
| University of Utah |
Mentioned in footer disclaimer regarding Cassell's address.
|
|
| FLSD |
Southern District of Florida (implied by docket header).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2015-03-24
Filing of Document 319-1 entered on FLSD Docket.
Florida Southern District Court
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
|
|
|
Address for Paul G. Cassell.
|
Relationships (3)
Signed as 'Attorneys for Jane Does No. 1, 2, 3 and 4'
Signed as 'Attorneys for Jane Does No. 1, 2, 3 and 4'
Edwards is filing a motion arguing the court should deny Dershowitz's motion.
Key Quotes (2)
"Dershowitz can’t have it both ways – simultaneously claiming he has the records and that he is harmed in collecting them – and the Court should not credit his conflicting positions."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014088.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court should deny Dershowitz’s motion to intervene."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014088.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document