030.pdf
321 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / letter to judge
File Size:
321 KB
Summary
This document is a letter dated March 20, 2020, from attorney Joshua I. Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. It requests oral argument regarding the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in the case of Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York law and doctrines of equitable estoppel/tolling, contrary to the Defendants' assertions.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Teresa Helm | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Helm v. Indyke et al., requesting oral argument against dismissal.
|
| Indyke | Defendant |
Named defendant in case title 'Helm v. Indyke et al.' (likely Richard Kahn or Darren Indyke, executors of Epstein est...
|
| Paul G. Gardephe | Judge |
The Honorable Paul G. Gardephe, United States District Court Judge receiving the letter.
|
| Joshua I. Schiller | Attorney |
Attorney at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP representing Plaintiff; signatory of the letter.
|
| David Boies | Attorney |
Attorney at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP listed under signature.
|
| Sigrid S. McCawley | Attorney |
Attorney at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP listed under signature.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller Flexner LLP |
Law firm representing the Plaintiff.
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court where the case is being heard.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-03-20
Filing of letter requesting oral argument in Helm v. Indyke et al.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the United States District Court.
|
|
|
Address of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.
|
Relationships (2)
Letter submitted by Joshua I. Schiller on behalf of Plaintiff Teresa Helm.
Case title Helm v. Indyke et al.
Key Quotes (4)
"Plaintiff Teresa Helm hereby requests oral argument on Defendants’ motion to dismiss her complaint under Rule 12(b)(6)"Source
030.pdf
Quote #1
"Plaintiff’s claims are timely under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 215(8)(a) and the doctrines of equitable estoppel and equitable tolling."Source
030.pdf
Quote #2
"Defendants seek to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety based on the incorrect contention that Plaintiff’s claims are untimely."Source
030.pdf
Quote #3
"Defendants seek the extreme remedy of complete dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint"Source
030.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document