030.pdf

60.2 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
5
Organizations
5
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Civil docket report
File Size: 60.2 KB
Summary

This document is a Civil Docket Report for Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 13, 2016. The case involves Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards filing a motion to quash a subpoena against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The docket records various motions, including requests to seal exhibits and appear Pro Hac Vice, culminating in an order on December 22, 2016, to transfer the motion to the Southern District of New York to be handled as part of the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-RWS). The case was terminated in the Florida court on December 23, 2016.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Bradley J. Edwards Plaintiff
Filing a Petition/Motion to Quash Subpoena
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Represented by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Denise Diamond Riley
John Scarola Attorney
Representing Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards; from Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Attorney
Lead Attorney for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell; from Haddon, Morgan and Fioreman, P.C.; Pro Hac Vice
Denise Diamond Riley Attorney
Attorney for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell; from Riley Law PLLC
Jonathan Goodman Magistrate Judge
Assigned to the case; signed various orders including the transfer order
Jose E. Martinez Judge
Initially assigned to the case before it was referred to Magistrate Judge Goodman
Giuffre Plaintiff (Related Case)
Mentioned in the case transfer details: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433-RWS

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida
Court where this docket was filed (Ft Lauderdale)
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
Law firm representing Bradley J. Edwards
Haddon, Morgan and Fioreman, P.C.
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell (Jeffrey S. Pagliuca)
Riley Law PLLC
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell (Denise Diamond Riley)
Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction to which the motion was transferred

Timeline (4 events)

2016-06-13
Case filed: Bradley J. Edwards v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Motion to Quash Subpoena)
Southern District of Florida
2016-06-29
Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca filed
Southern District of Florida
2016-12-22
Order transferring Motion to Quash Subpoena to Southern District of New York (Giuffre v. Maxwell)
Southern District of Florida / Southern District of New York
2016-12-23
Civil Case Terminated
Southern District of Florida

Locations (5)

Location Context
Location of the U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida
Address of Plaintiff's attorney John Scarola
Address of Defendant's attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Address of Defendant's attorney Denise Diamond Riley
Jurisdiction where the underlying case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) is located and where this motion was transferred

Relationships (4)

Bradley J. Edwards Legal Adversary Ghislaine Maxwell
Edwards filed a motion to quash a subpoena against Maxwell (Edwards v. Maxwell)
John Scarola Attorney-Client Bradley J. Edwards
Bradley J. Edwards represented by John Scarola
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Attorney-Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell represented by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Denise Diamond Riley Attorney-Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell represented by Denise Diamond Riley

Key Quotes (4)

"Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena to Quash from Another District"
Source
030.pdf
Quote #1
"ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman to take all necessary and proper action"
Source
030.pdf
Quote #2
"ORDER Transferring Motion to Quash Subpoena or, in the Alternative, for a Protective Order. The Undersigned directs the Clerk of Court to transfer Bradley J. Edwards' motion 1 to the Southern District of New York, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433-RWS."
Source
030.pdf
Quote #3
"NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order"
Source
030.pdf
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document