DOJ-OGR-00003006.jpg
768 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal opinion (united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
File Size:
768 KB
Summary
A page from a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against Maxwell's motion claiming prejudice due to pre-indictment delay, specifically rejecting her assertion that the deaths of potential witnesses (Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Detective Recarey) harmed her defense. The court/prosecution argues it is highly speculative to assume Epstein would have waived his Fifth Amendment rights to testify in Maxwell's favor and be found credible by a jury.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'The defendant' and 'Maxwell'; claiming prejudice due to unavailable witnesses.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Unavailable Witness / Co-conspirator |
Deceased; defendant claims he would have provided exculpatory testimony.
|
| Epstein's mother | Unavailable Witness |
Listed as unavailable due to pre-indictment delay.
|
| Michael Casey | Unavailable Witness / Agent |
Described as 'the alleged agent of Minor Victim-1'.
|
| Minor Victim-1 | Victim |
Associated with Michael Casey.
|
| Joseph Recarey | Detective / Unavailable Witness |
Palm Beach Police Department Detective; listed as unavailable.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach Police Department |
Employer of Detective Joseph Recarey.
|
|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) |
Jurisdiction implied by case citation and header.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated in footer identifier DOJ-OGR-00003006.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-04-16
Filing date of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
S.D.N.Y.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the Police Department mentioned.
|
Relationships (2)
Maxwell argues Epstein would have testified she did not engage in criminal activity.
Described as 'the alleged agent of Minor Victim-1'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Her speculative assertions simply do not rise to that level."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003006.jpg
Quote #1
"She contends that the loss of Epstein demonstrates actual prejudice because Epstein 'would have' testified that the defendant did not engage in the criminal activity with which she is charged."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003006.jpg
Quote #2
"To credit Maxwell’s argument is to assume that Epstein... would have taken the stand, would not have invoked his Fifth Amendment rights, and would have provided testimony that exculpated Maxwell"Source
DOJ-OGR-00003006.jpg
Quote #3
"This is an exercise in chain upon chain of conjecture that comes nowhere close to meeting the burden of demonstrating actual prejudice."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003006.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document