DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg

1.01 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
4
Relationships
8
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 1.01 MB
Summary

This legal document details the contentious communications in late November and early December 2007 between federal prosecutors (Acosta, Sloman, Villafaña) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Starr). The core conflict revolved around the timing, content, and legal necessity of notifying victims about Epstein's upcoming state plea hearing, with the defense arguing for delay and review, and the prosecution asserting its obligations and threatening to void the plea agreement. The dispute involved a series of letters and instructions, highlighting the friction in executing the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).

People (7)

Name Role Context
Epstein Defendant
Mentioned in relation to his agreement to plead guilty to state charges, serve jail time, and potential monetary dama...
Sloman
Exchanged edits on a draft victim notification letter with Villafaña, informed Lefkowitz of the government's intent t...
Villafaña
Exchanged edits with Sloman, provided a draft notification letter to Lefkowitz, was informed by a lead case agent abo...
Lefkowitz Defense Counsel (implied)
Objected to the government's plan to notify victims, argued on behalf of the defense, and sent letters to Acosta.
Acosta
Received and replied to letters from Lefkowitz, accused the defense team of delaying the NPA, and directed prosecutor...
Starr Defense Counsel
Informed by Acosta via letter about a deadline for victim notifications and co-sent a letter with Lefkowitz to Acosta.
Fisher Assistant Attorney General
Received a copy of a letter sent by Starr and Lefkowitz to Acosta.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
State Attorney’s Office government agency
Mentioned as the office where victims could file a written statement for the state court hearing.
FBI government agency
Mentioned as one of the agencies from which victims had received notification letters.
USAO government agency
Mentioned as one of the agencies from which victims had received notification letters.

Timeline (5 events)

2007-11-28
Villafaña provided Lefkowitz with the draft victim notification letter at Sloman's instruction.
2007-11-29
Lefkowitz sent a letter to Acosta objecting to the draft notification letter.
2007-11-30
Acosta replied to Lefkowitz's letter and also sent a letter to Starr setting a deadline for holding the victim notifications.
2007-12-05
Starr and Lefkowitz sent a letter to Acosta reaffirming the NPA.
2007-12-14
Epstein's state court plea hearing was scheduled to occur.
state court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the place where Epstein would serve 18 months as part of his agreement.

Relationships (4)

Sloman professional Villafaña
They exchanged edits on a draft victim notification letter and communicated about its contents and distribution, indicating they were colleagues working on the same task.
Acosta adversarial professional Lefkowitz
They exchanged letters arguing over the legal obligations and procedures for notifying victims under Epstein's NPA. Acosta accused Lefkowitz's team of delaying tactics, while Lefkowitz objected strongly to Acosta's team's proposed actions.
Lefkowitz professional Starr
They are both identified as part of Epstein's defense team and co-authored a letter to Acosta on December 5, 2007.
Acosta professional Starr
Acosta, representing the government, sent a letter directly to Starr, as defense counsel, to inform him of a directive given to prosecutors.

Key Quotes (8)

"[t]here are a few girls who didn’t receive the original letters, so I will need to modify the introductory portion of the letter for those."
Source
— Villafaña (Informing Sloman about the need to edit the draft victim notification letter.)
DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg
Quote #1
"incendiary and inappropriate"
Source
— Lefkowitz (Describing his objection to the proposal to notify victims before Epstein's plea.)
DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg
Quote #2
"should have a right to review and make objections to that submission prior to it being sent to any alleged victims."
Source
— Lefkowitz (Arguing for the defense's right to review the victim notification letter.)
DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg
Quote #3
"we stand ready to unwind the Agreement"
Source
— Acosta (In a reply letter to Lefkowitz, asserting the government's position if Epstein was dissatisfied with the NPA.)
DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg
Quote #4
"not to issue victim notification letters until this Friday [December 7] at 5 p.m., to provide you with time to review these options with your client."
Source
— Acosta (In a letter to defense counsel Starr, directing prosecutors to hold the letters.)
DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg
Quote #5
"the victims were not told of the availability of Section 2255 relief during the investigation phase of this matter."
Source
— Acosta (Refuting defense allegations that Villafaña had acted improperly.)
DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg
Quote #6
"still holding many of the original V/W letters addressed to victims from the USAO."
Source
— lead case agent (Reporting to Villafaña on the status of victim notification letters on December 6, 2007.)
DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg
Quote #7
"[I]f the matter is set for the 14th, please let me know so I can include that in my victim notifications."
Source
— Villafaña (In an email to state prosecutors seeking confirmation of the court date.)
DOJ-OGR-00021413.jpg
Quote #8

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document