DOJ-OGR-00020450.jpg
1.43 MB
Extraction Summary
12
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
6
Events
4
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.43 MB
Summary
This document is a log of court filings from November 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries detail orders and a memorandum opinion concerning evidentiary motions, specifically the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court is ruling on what testimony from this witness regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein will be permissible, setting deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to court documents.
People (12)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of multiple letters, orders, and a memorandum opinion. Referred to as Defendant and Ms. Maxwell.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of letters and signer of court orders in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | null |
Sender of a JOINT LETTER on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Mr. Rodriguez | Former employee |
Mentioned in an ORDER as a former employee who purportedly removed Government Exhibit 52 from a property before Emplo...
|
| Employee-1 | null |
Mentioned in an ORDER regarding their ability to authenticate Government Exhibit 52.
|
| Mr. Epstein | null |
Mentioned in relation to Employee-1's work history and in the anticipated testimony of Witness-3, who was introduced ...
|
| Accuser-3 | Accuser/Witness |
Subject of a motion in limine to exclude evidence related to them. Also referred to as Witness-3.
|
| Witness-3 | Witness |
The name the Court uses for Accuser-3. Expected to testify about their relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and Mr. Ep...
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA |
Sender of a LETTER on behalf of the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA |
Sender of a LETTER on behalf of the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA |
Sender of a LETTER on behalf of the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA |
Sender of a LETTER on behalf of the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case, issuing orders and opinions.
|
| Government | Government agency |
Refers to the prosecution (USA), which is submitting letters and proffering testimony.
|
| Second Circuit | Court |
Mentioned as the source of a three-part test for redactions from the case Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga | Company |
A party in the case Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, cited for a legal test.
|
| USA | Government agency |
The United States of America, the prosecution in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filing a letter.
|
Timeline (6 events)
2021-10-29
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence related to Accuser-3.
null
2021-11-01
A court hearing was held where the Court provided a brief explanation of its position on the motion regarding Accuser-3.
null
2021-11-10
An in-camera court hearing was held to hear arguments related to the motion to exclude evidence from Accuser-3.
null
2021-11-19
Issuance of an ORDER regarding Government Exhibit 52 and the authentication by Employee-1.
null
2021-11-19
Issuance of an ORDER that GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Defendant's motion to exclude evidence related to Accuser-3.
null
2021-11-19
Issuance of a MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER regarding the Defendant's motion to exclude testimony from Witness-3 (Accuser-3).
null
Relationships (4)
The document states that Witness-3 is anticipated to testify about her relationship with both the Defendant (Maxwell) and Mr. Epstein, and that Maxwell introduced Witness-3 to Mr. Epstein.
Witness-3 is expected to testify about how she met the Defendant and her relationship with her. Maxwell allegedly introduced Witness-3 to Mr. Epstein and facilitated massages that progressed to sexual activity.
Mr. Rodriguez is described as a former employee who worked on a property, presumably for Mr. Epstein, before Employee-1 began working there.
The document states that Employee-1 began working for Mr. Epstein after Mr. Rodriguez left.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document