DOJ-OGR-00002354.jpg

621 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 621 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of the criminal case against Maxwell, argues that the government's prosecution is based on tainted evidence. The defense claims the government made false representations to circumvent a civil Protective Order from the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' defamation case, and therefore the perjury charges stemming from Maxwell's depositions in that case should be suppressed. The document provides factual background on the civil case, where Virginia Giuffre alleged Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were involved in a scheme to sexually abuse and traffic her.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Mary McCarthy
Mentioned in a paraphrase at the beginning of the document regarding her philippic about Lillian Hellman.
Lillian Hellman
Mentioned in a paraphrase at the beginning of the document as the subject of Mary McCarthy's philippic.
Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the prosecution, alleged to have committed perjury during civil depositions in the case Giuffre v. Max...
Virginia Giuffre Plaintiff
Filed a civil defamation case against Maxwell in 2015, alleging Maxwell defamed her by denying allegations of sexual ...
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned as the individual who, in a scheme with Maxwell, allegedly sexually abused and trafficked Virginia Giuffre.
Norman Mailer Author
Cited in a footnote as the author of an article titled “An Appeal to Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy.”

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
government government agency
Refers to the prosecution in the Maxwell case, accused of making untrue representations.
Court government agency
The judicial body presiding over the Maxwell case, which the document argues has the authority to suppress evidence.
New York Times company
The publication in which Norman Mailer's cited article appeared, mentioned in a footnote.

Timeline (3 events)

2015
Virginia Giuffre filed a civil defamation case, Giuffre v. Maxwell.
2021-02-04
Filing of Document 134 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, arguing for the suppression of evidence in the Maxwell prosecution.
Maxwell's legal team government
Two civil depositions of Maxwell were taken in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case, which are the basis for perjury charges.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the citation for the New York Times.

Relationships (3)

Maxwell adversarial (legal) Virginia Giuffre
Giuffre filed a civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Maxwell co-conspirators (alleged) Jeffrey Epstein
The document states Giuffre alleged that Maxwell participated in a scheme with Jeffrey Epstein to have her sexually abused and trafficked.
Mary McCarthy adversarial (literary) Lillian Hellman
The document references McCarthy's "philippic about Lillian Hellman," indicating a public dispute, which is used as a rhetorical device.

Key Quotes (4)

"including ‘and’ and ‘the.’"
Source
— Mary McCarthy (A quote from Mary McCarthy's philippic about Lillian Hellman, used to characterize the government's representation as completely untrue.)
DOJ-OGR-00002354.jpg
Quote #1
"untrue"
Source
— Maxwell’s attorney-hired press agent (Term used by Maxwell's press agent to deny Virginia Giuffre's allegations.)
DOJ-OGR-00002354.jpg
Quote #2
"obvious lies"
Source
— Maxwell’s attorney-hired press agent (Term used by Maxwell's press agent to deny Virginia Giuffre's allegations.)
DOJ-OGR-00002354.jpg
Quote #3
"sexually abused and trafficked"
Source
— Virginia Giuffre (Description of what Virginia Giuffre alleged Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein caused to happen to her.)
DOJ-OGR-00002354.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document