HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg

2.49 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
11
Organizations
16
Locations
3
Events
5
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document (court opinion/case reporter)
File Size: 2.49 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a federal court opinion discussing motions to dismiss in a case involving allegations of material support for terrorism. It analyzes legal precedents such as *Halberstam* and *Boim* to determine if Prince Turki and Prince Sultan can be held liable for supporting charities allegedly linked to al Qaeda, noting distinctions regarding when organizations were officially designated as terrorists. The court examines whether plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient facts to show the defendants knew the charities were fronts for illegal activities.

Timeline (3 events)

September 11 attacks (implied context)
Designation of Hamas as terrorist organization (1995)
Designation of BIF and Al Haramain branches (2002-2004)

Relationships (5)

Key Quotes (4)

"Prince Sultan argues that Plaintiffs blur the distinction between charities he is on record of supporting, IIRO and WAMY, and those he is not, Al Haramain and MWL."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
Quote #1
"The court found the defendant was so close to the illegal activity that she had to be aware of her role in it."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
Quote #2
"Unlike Hamas in Boim, none of the organizations the Princes are alleged to have supported in an official capacity were designated a sponsor of terrorism at the time of the alleged contributions."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
Quote #3
"Plaintiffs would have to allege specific facts showing that the Princes knew or should have known that the charities they supported were actually fronts for al Qaeda."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document