HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305.jpg
4.21 MB
Extraction Summary
15
People
30
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Federal register publication page, potentially used as an exhibit for the house oversight committee, based on the footer stamp.
File Size:
4.21 MB
Summary
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, discussing a rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning the statute of limitations for unfair labor practice claims. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305' suggests it was cataloged as an exhibit for a congressional committee. The content of the document itself is purely about U.S. labor law and contains no information, names, or events related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
People (15)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Harkin | Commenter |
Mentioned in footnote 147 as having submitted comments to the National Labor Relations Board.
|
| Miller | Commenter |
Mentioned in footnote 147 as having submitted comments to the National Labor Relations Board.
|
| Vance | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Vance v. Whirlpool Corp.
|
| Elliot | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Elliot v. Group Med. & Surgical Serv.
|
| Posey | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Posey v. Skyline Corp.
|
| Schroeder | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Schroeder v. Copley Newspaper.
|
| Kephart | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Kephart v. Inst. Gas Tech.
|
| Beshears | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Beshears v. Asbill.
|
| McClinton | Litigant |
Party in the cited case McClinton v. Alabama By-Prods. Corp.
|
| Henchy | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Henchy v. City of Absecon.
|
| Kamens | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Kamens v. Summit Stainless, Inc.
|
| Wilkerson | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Wilkerson v. Siegfried Ins. Agency, Inc.
|
| Bonham | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Bonham v. Dresser Industries.
|
| Holland | Litigant |
Party in the cited case Holland v. Florida.
|
| Slater | Litigant |
Party in the cited case American Bus Association v. Slater.
|
Organizations (30)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) | ||
| Whirlpool Corp. | ||
| Group Med. & Surgical Serv. | ||
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) | ||
| Kentucky State Police Dept. | ||
| Skyline Corp. | ||
| Copley Newspaper | ||
| Inst. Gas Tech. | ||
| Alabama By-Prods. Corp. | ||
| City of Absecon | ||
| Summit Stainless, Inc. | ||
| Siegfried Ins. Agency, Inc. | ||
| Dresser Industries | ||
| AFL-CIO | ||
| Service Employees International Union (SEIU) | ||
| International Association of Machinists (IAM) | ||
| Broadway Volkswagen | ||
| East Bay Automotive Council | ||
| University Moving & Storage Co. | ||
| John Morrell & Co. | ||
| Pullman Building Company | ||
| Burgess Construction | ||
| Kanakis Co. | ||
| FMI | ||
| COLLE | ||
| California Chamber of Commerce | ||
| NCAE | ||
| American Bus Association | ||
| U.S. Chamber of Commerce | ||
| House Oversight Committee (implied by footer) |
Timeline (1 events)
2011-08-30
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final rule in the Federal Register regarding the equitable tolling of the 10(b) statute of limitations under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The rule establishes that an employer's failure to post required notices of employee rights will toll the six-month period for filing an unfair labor practice charge.
Federal Register
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The document pertains to U.S. federal law (NLRA) and cites U.S. court cases and the U.S. Supreme Court.
|
Relationships (2)
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
→
Regulatory process participant
→
AFL-CIO, SEIU, FMI, COLLE, California Chamber of Commerce, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
The document states that the NLRB received comments from these organizations regarding a proposed rule.
House Oversight Committee
→
Evidentiary exhibit
→
Federal Register document
The footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305' indicates the document was collected and indexed, likely as an exhibit, for the committee.
Key Quotes (3)
"the simple failure to post [Title VII and ADEA] notices, without intent to actively mislead the plaintiff respecting the cause of action, does not extend the time within which a claimant must file his or her discrimination charge."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305.jpg
Quote #1
"would grant to the employee a right to be informed without redress for violation."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305.jpg
Quote #2
"to require diligent prosecution of known claims, thereby providing finality and predictability in legal affairs and ensuring that claims will be resolved while evidence is reasonably available and fresh."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document