EFTA00032757.pdf

127 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Internal email chain (us attorney's office)
File Size: 127 KB
Summary

This document consists of an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated June 15-16, 2021, discussing the upcoming suppression hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence addresses legal strategy, including Maxwell's filing of 12 separate memos of law to evade page limits, and clarifies the identity of Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a plaintiff in a related civil action. The emails also reference previous proceedings before Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the suppression hearing and memos of law discussed.
Stan Pottinger Lawyer
Identified as a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented the plaintiff in a civil action.
Judge Nathan Judge
Presiding judge (AJN - Alison J. Nathan); stated she will resolve suppression motions at a later time.
Judge Sweet Judge
Mentioned regarding an original application and lack of transcript.
McMahon Judge (likely)
Referenced regarding 'McMahon proceedings' and her opinion.
Rossmiller Mentioned Person
Mentioned in relation to an issue with the upcoming suppression hearing.
Kramer Mentioned Person
Mentioned in relation to an issue with the upcoming suppression hearing.
Redacted Sender/Recipients USANYS Attorneys/Staff
Participants in the email chain discussing legal strategy.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
USANYS
U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of New York (Sender/Recipient domain).
Boies Schiller
Law firm where Stan Pottinger worked.
Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction listed in signature block.
Public Corruption Unit
Unit within USANYS listed in signature block.

Timeline (1 events)

2021 (Upcoming relative to email)
AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
SDNY Court
Ghislaine Maxwell Judge Nathan USANYS Attorneys

Locations (1)

Location Context
Office location.

Relationships (3)

Stan Pottinger Employment Boies Schiller
Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller
Stan Pottinger Legal Representation Plaintiff (Redacted)
represented [Redacted], the plaintiff in the civil action
Ghislaine Maxwell Legal (Defendant/Judge) Judge Nathan
Context of suppression hearing before AJN (Alison J Nathan)

Key Quotes (3)

"She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years."
Source
EFTA00032757.pdf
Quote #1
"Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented [Redacted], the plaintiff in the civil action."
Source
EFTA00032757.pdf
Quote #2
"Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions 'at a later time' ahead of trial."
Source
EFTA00032757.pdf
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document