DOJ-OGR-00002327(1).jpg
729 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
5
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
729 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was denied her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community. It cites a parallel case, U.S. v. Balde, and an expert analysis by Jeffrey Martin, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic individuals in the White Plains jury wheel. Because Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same pool, the document contends this analysis applies to her case as well.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Reyes |
Mentioned in a case citation: 'Reyes, 934 F. Supp. at 556.'
|
|
| Judge Failla | Judge |
Presiding over the case 'United States v. Balde' in the same District.
|
| Balde | Defendant |
Defendant in the case 'United States v. Balde', who made a similar challenge to the grand jury composition.
|
| Jeffrey Martin | Jury composition expert |
Provided an analysis of the racial and ethnic composition of jury wheels for the 'Balde' case, which is being referen...
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant in the current case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), whose grand jury is the subject of this argument.
|
| Mr. Martin | Jury composition expert |
Referenced as the expert who analyzed the jury wheels and found underrepresentation. Same person as Jeffrey Martin.
|
| Taylor |
Mentioned in a case citation: 'Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522, 530 (1975).'
|
|
| Osorio |
Mentioned in a case citation: 'United States v. Osorio, 801 F. Supp. 966, 973-74 (D. Conn. 1992).'
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in several court cases, such as 'United States v. Balde' and 'United States v. Osorio'.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2020-11-09
The 'Declaration of Jeffrey Martin in Support of Motion to Dismiss' was filed in the case of U.S. v. Balde.
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of one of the two qualified jury wheels and the location of a case mentioned.
|
|
|
Location of one of the two qualified jury wheels, which is the subject of the analysis for underrepresentation.
|
|
|
Refers to the judicial district where the cases are pending and whose juror population is being analyzed.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the case citation 'Taylor v. Louisiana'.
|
|
|
Abbreviation for the District of Connecticut, mentioned in the 'United States v. Osorio' case citation.
|
Relationships (3)
Both are defendants in separate cases who were indicted in June 2020 and are challenging the composition of the grand jury drawn from the same jury wheels.
Jeffrey Martin served as a jury composition expert for the defendant in the Balde case, providing an analysis to support a motion to dismiss.
Ms. Maxwell's legal argument relies on the analysis previously conducted by Jeffrey Martin for the Balde case, as her grand jury was drawn from the same wheels Martin analyzed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document