HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015624.jpg
1.74 MB
Extraction Summary
9
People
2
Organizations
4
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing (response to motion)
File Size:
1.74 MB
Summary
This document is page 4 of a legal response by Edwards and Cassell in a case against Alan Dershowitz, arguing that sexual abuse allegations are inherent to the lawsuit and not peripheral. The text references legal precedents regarding confidentiality and cites Dershowitz's own counterclaim, which quotes specific allegations that Epstein forced a minor (Jane Doe #3) to have sexual relations with Dershowitz in various locations.
People (9)
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Harvard Law | ||
| Federal Court |
Timeline (3 events)
Filing of Counterclaim by Dershowitz
Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action
Alleged sexual abuse involving Jane Doe #3 and Alan Dershowitz
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (3)
→
Attorney for Plaintiff/Respondent
→
→
Defendant/Counter-Claimant
→
→
Associate/Friend
→
Key Quotes (2)
"sexual abuse allegations filed by attorneys Edwards and Cassell for their client Ms. Virginia Giuffre are not peripheral to this lawsuit – they are inherent to it."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015624.jpg
Quote #1
"One such powerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015624.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document