DOJ-OGR-00021295.jpg
950 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Government report (likely doj office of professional responsibility / opr report)
File Size:
950 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing events in late November 2007 regarding the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes attempts by Epstein's lawyers (Starr and Lefkowitz) to meet with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to complain about the NPA's civil damages provision and victim notification plans. The text highlights internal DOJ dissent, with CEOS Chief Oosterbaan calling the deal 'egregious' and 'advantageous for the defendant,' while Prosecutor Villafaña expressed a desire to indict Epstein due to defense tactics.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Starr | Epstein's Counsel |
Requested meeting with Fisher; argued USAO improperly compelled Epstein regarding civil damages.
|
| Fisher | Assistant Attorney General |
Target of meeting request by Starr; claimed she played no role in the NPA.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Subject of the criminal case and NPA negotiations.
|
| Lefkowitz | Epstein's Counsel |
Emailed Sloman and Acosta complaining about victim notification and the NPA.
|
| Sloman | DOJ/USAO Official |
Received emails from Lefkowitz; forwarded Starr letter to Villafaña.
|
| Lourie | DOJ/USAO Official |
Consulted with Oosterbaan; sent Starr letter to Sloman; spoke with Starr on phone.
|
| Villafaña | Prosecutor/USAO |
Asked to prepare chronology; expressed desire to indict Epstein due to breach of agreement.
|
| Oosterbaan | CEOS Chief (Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section) |
Consulted by Lourie; criticized the NPA as advantageous to defendant and not helpful to victims.
|
| Acosta | US Attorney |
Received complaint letter from Lefkowitz; responded directing him to Villafaña or Sloman.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR | ||
| USAO | ||
| Department | ||
| CEOS | ||
| Pepperdine |
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Lourie consulted with Oosterbaan
|
Relationships (3)
Footnote 152: 'referring to the law school where Starr served as Dean.'
Lourie consulted with CEOS Chief Oosterbaan
Starr argued that the USAO improperly had compelled Epstein
Key Quotes (4)
"Villafaña responded that she was 'going through all of the ways in which they have tried to breach the agreement to convince you guys to let me indict.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021295.jpg
Quote #1
"Oosterbaan responded to Lourie that he was 'not thrilled' about the NPA; described Epstein’s conduct as unusually 'egregious,' particularly because of its serial nature"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021295.jpg
Quote #2
"observed that the NPA was 'pretty advantageous for the defendant and not all that helpful to the victims.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021295.jpg
Quote #3
"She [Fisher] told OPR, however, that she 'played no role in' the NPA and did not review or approve the agreement either before or after it was signed."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021295.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document