006.pdf
79.4 KB
Extraction Summary
13
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal ruling
File Size:
79.4 KB
Summary
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 28, 2009. It addresses ten separate civil cases filed against Jeffrey Epstein by various plaintiffs (Jane Does and C.M.A.). The order grants the plaintiffs' motion to consolidate cases for discovery purposes and grants a protective order limiting Epstein to a single deposition per plaintiff to prevent piecemeal depositions, while also ordering parties in remaining cases to show cause why they should not also be consolidated.
People (13)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in multiple civil lawsuits involving Jane Doe plaintiffs.
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | United States District Judge |
Judge issuing the Order granting protective orders and consolidation of cases.
|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 08-CV-80119
|
| Jane Doe No. 3 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 08-CV-80232
|
| Jane Doe No. 4 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 08-CV-80380
|
| Jane Doe No. 5 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 08-CV-80381
|
| Jane Doe No. 6 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 08-80994
|
| Jane Doe No. 7 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 08-80993
|
| C.M.A. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 08-80811
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 08-80893
|
| Doe II | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 09-80469
|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case 09-80591
|
| Johnson | Magistrate Judge |
Referenced in case numbers (MARRA/JOHNSON)
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Timeline (2 events)
2009-04-28
Judge Marra issues Order granting Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Consolidate Cases for Discovery.
West Palm Beach, Florida
2009-05-05
Deadline for parties in six specific cases to Show Cause why they should not be consolidated for discovery.
Southern District of Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
Listed as Plaintiff vs Defendant in case 08-CV-80119
Listed as Plaintiff vs Defendant in case 08-80811
Key Quotes (4)
"Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions is GRANTED"Source
006.pdf
Quote #1
"Defendant is limited to a single deposition of each Plaintiff, during which Defendant may depose the plaintiff as both a party and a witness to all other cases of a similar nature"Source
006.pdf
Quote #2
"Defendant should not expect to be able to re-depose any plaintiff relative to any new cases that may be filed."Source
006.pdf
Quote #3
"Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery is GRANTED."Source
006.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document