DOJ-OGR-00000310.jpg
792 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court order (page from a memorandum or response)
File Size:
792 KB
Summary
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) entered on July 9, 2019. The government argues that the Petitioners (victims) lack standing to void Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) because the government is contractually bound to it, and a favorable ruling would not redress their injury. However, the document notably admits that a federal investigation and potential prosecution of Epstein remains a 'legally viable possibility' regardless of the NPA's status.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Defendant / Subject of Investigation |
Subject of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and potential future federal prosecution.
|
| Petitioners | Plaintiffs / Victims |
Individuals seeking to void the Non-Prosecution Agreement and claiming CVRA violations.
|
| Government Attorney | Prosecutor / Official |
Person handling the case with whom Petitioners can confer.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States |
Must legally abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
|
|
| Court |
The entity being asked to rule on the CVRA violations and standing.
|
|
| 9th Cir. |
Cited in case law (Lomayaktewa v. Hathaway).
|
|
| 11th Cir. |
Cited in case law (Scott v. Taylor).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-09
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Florida Southern District (indicated in the header stamp).
|
Relationships (3)
Petitioners seeking to void Epstein's non-prosecution agreement; crimes committed against Petitioners.
United States must legally abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Dispute over CVRA violations and standing regarding the NPA.
Key Quotes (4)
"the United States must legally abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement even if this Court should somehow set the agreement aside"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000310.jpg
Quote #1
"potential federal prosecution of Epstein for crimes committed against the Petitioners and others remains a legally viable possibility."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000310.jpg
Quote #2
"Petitioners simply have no injury that is likely to be redressed by a favorable ruling in these proceedings."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000310.jpg
Quote #3
"Significantly, it is Epstein’s contractual rights under the non-prosecution agreement that Petitioners seek to void through these proceedings."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000310.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document