032.pdf
50.9 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal order (final order of dismissal)
File Size:
50.9 KB
Summary
This is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated June 25, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe No. 8 against Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of that settlement.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 8 | Plaintiff |
Party suing Jeffrey Epstein in this civil case
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Party being sued in this civil case
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | United States District Judge |
Judge signing the dismissal order
|
| Johnson | Judge/Magistrate |
Listed in case number 09-CV-80802-MARRA-JOHNSON
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Venue where the case was heard
|
Timeline (2 events)
2010-06-25
Filing of Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [DE 31]
Southern District of Florida
2010-06-25
Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued, closing the case
West Palm Beach, Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the Chambers where the order was signed
|
Relationships (2)
Plaintiff vs Defendant in case 09-CV-80802
Court mentions enforcing terms of the parties' settlement
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,022 characters)
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2010 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 09-CV-80802-MARRA-JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 8
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
/
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
/
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with
Prejudice [DE 31], filed June 25, 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In
accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
Prejudice [DE 31], filed June 25, 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In
accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties'
settlement.
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties'
settlement.
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida this 25th day
of June, 2010.
of June, 2010.
[Signature]
KENNETH A. MARRA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KENNETH A. MARRA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies Furnished to:
All Counsel of Record
All Counsel of Record
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document