United States
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DiGiacomo
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Korfant
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Chandler
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Conway
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Kidd
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Raniere
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Khashoggi
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
Midland Asphalt Corp.
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
location
Taiwan
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
location
France
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Giglio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Petitioners
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Salameh
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Villa
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Macchia
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Havens
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Vilar
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Georgiou
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Madoff
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Williams
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Young
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Vickers
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Pena
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002177(1).jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing against granting bail to a defendant. The prosecution contends that the defendant is a significant flight risk due to her extensive foreign ties, including citizenship in three countries, foreign property, and bank accounts. The filing also highlights her weak ties to the United States and points out inconsistencies in her statements, such as previously claiming to be divorcing the same husband she now cites as a reason to remain in the country.
DOJ-OGR-00002172.jpg
This legal document is a court's discussion and rejection of a defendant's "Renewed Bail Application." The Court argues that the defense is reiterating previously rejected arguments and that new financial information presented does not alter the original conclusion that the defendant is a flight risk. The document reaffirms the decision for detention, citing the egregious nature of the charges, which involve the sexual abuse of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00002167.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 18, 2020, summarizes the defense's arguments from a bail hearing held on July 14, 2020. The defense urged the court to release the defendant, who was arrested by the FBI on July 2, 2020, citing family ties in the U.S. and offering to hire private security. The defense also addressed the government's concerns about the defendant's finances and willingness to provide more information to secure a bail bond.
DOJ-OGR-00002158.jpg
This document is a character reference letter dated November 2, 2020, submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The redacted author, a long-time friend of Ghislaine Maxwell, vouches for her character and integrity, arguing she is not a flight risk and should be granted bail. The author concludes by offering to provide personal financial surety to meet any bail pledge set by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00002153.jpg
This document is page 2 of an affidavit proposed by Ghislaine Maxwell in December 2020 as part of a bail application (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In the document, Maxwell acknowledges her French citizenship but voluntarily and irrevocably waives her right to contest extradition from France to the United States should she be released on bail and subsequently flee. She explicitly consents to extradition under the USA/EU Agreement on Extradition to assure the court she will not use French citizenship to evade US justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002152.jpg
This document is a sworn affidavit and waiver of extradition from Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Maxwell affirms her identity as the defendant, states her triple citizenship (US, UK, France), and confirms she is incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. She attests to having reviewed the charges and her extradition rights under various international treaties with her legal counsel from Cohen & Gresser, LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00002130.jpg
This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié and filed on December 14, 2020, provides a background on the bail hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell held on July 14, 2020. It highlights the US Government's argument and the Court's decision to deny bail, both of which centered on Maxwell's French citizenship and France's policy of not extraditing its nationals, which established her as a flight risk. The report's stated purpose is to legally evaluate the validity of the claim that France does not extradite its citizens.
DOJ-OGR-00002127.jpg
This legal document, authored by French attorney William Julié, provides an analysis of the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from the USA to France. Julié argues that despite her French citizenship, French authorities would likely grant an extradition request because the US-France extradition treaty does not prohibit extraditing nationals. He further states that factors like her US citizenship, a signed waiver, and the obligation for France to try her if extradition is denied, make her return to the USA highly probable, especially in a scenario where she had fled in violation of bail.
DOJ-OGR-00002117.jpg
This document is an Affidavit and Waiver of Extradition filed by Ghislaine Maxwell on December 14, 2020. In it, Maxwell confirms her citizenship (US, UK, France), her residence in the US since 1991, and her incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. She acknowledges reviewing the charges with her legal counsel from Cohen & Gresser, LLP, and indicates an understanding of her rights regarding extradition treaties between the US and the UK.
DOJ-OGR-00002115.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Document 97-21) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (indicated by case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It details the 'Practical Experience' of a legal expert named Mr. Perry, specifically focusing on his history with high-profile extradition cases involving the US, UK, and Russia. The document lists specific case citations where Mr. Perry represented various parties, including the US Government, the Governor of the Cayman Islands, and individual defendants resisting extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00002114.jpg
This document is the Curriculum Vitae of David Perry QC, a prominent UK barrister specializing in extradition law. It outlines his extensive career, including roles as Treasury Counsel and a judge, and highlights his expertise in extradition matters. A key event detailed is his co-authorship of a major 2011 independent review for the UK Home Office on the nation's extradition arrangements, which concluded that the 2003 UK-US treaty was fair and did not need renegotiation.
DOJ-OGR-00002112.jpg
This document is an annex from a legal filing, dated August 12, 2020, containing instructions from the law firm Peters and Peters to an unnamed Counsel. The instructions outline five specific questions for an expert opinion on the extradition arrangements between the United Kingdom and the United States, focusing on procedures, bail, and potential legal and human rights-based challenges to extradition that could be relevant to Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002109.jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, analyzing the legal viability of Ghislaine Maxwell resisting extradition from the UK to the US. It specifically argues that she would fail to invoke Article 6 (fair trial) or Article 8 (private and family life) of the ECHR to stop extradition. The conclusion begins to state that if she absconded to the UK in breach of US bail, she would likely be denied bail there.
DOJ-OGR-00002108.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 14, 2020, analyzing the potential human rights objections Ghislaine Maxwell might raise against extradition to the US. The text specifically argues that Maxwell is unlikely to succeed in claiming a violation of Article 3 of the ECHR regarding prison conditions, citing numerous legal precedents where such claims were rejected. Footnotes reference specific cases and US detention facilities (MDC and MCC) in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002107.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, argues for the extradition of Ms. Maxwell to the United States. It contends that a U.S. trial would best serve the interests of the victims and that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could successfully oppose extradition on the grounds of her physical or mental health, as the legal threshold for such an argument is exceptionally high.
DOJ-OGR-00002106.jpg
This page is part of a legal filing (Document 97-21) filed on December 14, 2020, analyzing the likelihood of Ghislaine Maxwell successfully contesting extradition under UK law. The text argues that Maxwell cannot rely on 'passage of time' or 'forum' bars to prevent extradition, citing that while some conduct occurred in London, the majority of harm occurred in the US. It heavily references the Extradition Act 2003 and various legal precedents (Tollman, Gomes, Kakis).
DOJ-OGR-00002103.jpg
This page from a legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, discusses procedures for extradition cases, specifically focusing on the effect of consenting to extradition and the legal framework for granting bail. It outlines the statutory considerations for bail under the Bail Act 1976 and notes that in recent US bail appeals before the High Court, bail has been consistently refused, citing the cases of Adeagbo and Singh as examples.
DOJ-OGR-00002101.jpg
This document is page 6 of 29 from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 14, 2020. It outlines the legal framework and procedural hurdles for appealing extradition in the United Kingdom under the Extradition Act 2003, noting the specific roles of the Secretary of State, High Court, and Supreme Court. The text emphasizes the rarity of successful appeals to the Supreme Court or the European Court of Human Rights in extradition cases.
DOJ-OGR-00002098.jpg
This document is page 3 of 29 from a court filing (Document 97-21) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020. The text asserts that it is highly unlikely Maxwell could successfully resist extradition to the United States regarding charges from the July 7, 2020 superseding indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002093.jpg
This document is a sworn affidavit and waiver of extradition from Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In it, Maxwell states her citizenship (US, UK, France), her current incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, and confirms she has reviewed the indictment with her lawyers, Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell. She also acknowledges being informed of her rights regarding extradition under various treaties between the U.S., France, and the EU.
DOJ-OGR-00002090.jpg
This document is a sworn affidavit from Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In the affidavit, Maxwell confirms her identity, her citizenship in the US, UK, and France, and her incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. She attests that she has reviewed the indictment with her lawyers and understands her rights concerning a potential extradition request from the United States to the United Kingdom.
DOJ-OGR-00002084.jpg
This document is a statement from a security consultant detailing their extensive military and security background. The consultant attests to providing security services for Ghislaine Maxwell from July 2019 until her arrest on July 2, 2020. The statement highlights the security threats Maxwell faced, including death threats related to her past relationship with Jeffery Epstein and aggressive harassment from the press.
DOJ-OGR-00002067.jpg
This document is a page from a forensic accounting report filed in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). It details the finances of the Terramar Project (US and UK), noting Maxwell's contributions of over $560,000 and a $57,000 donation from the Epstein Interests Foundation in 2013. The report asserts Maxwell received no financial benefit from the charity and lists reviewed bank accounts belonging to Maxwell and her spouse, though the specific bank names are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002065.jpg
This document is a Financial Condition Report filed in December 2020, summarizing Ghislaine Maxwell's assets between 2015 and 2020. It details a net worth of approximately $20.2 million in early 2015, the sale of a $15 million NYC property, and her 2016 marriage, after which she transferred the majority of her assets to a trust controlled by her spouse. It also notes a potential $1.5 million tax liability from a New York state audit.
DOJ-OGR-00002042.jpg
A character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The author, whose name is redacted, describes a 30-year friendship with Maxwell, noting her academic success at Oxford and honesty. The author details two specific trips to the US in February 2013 and December 2018 where they and their son stayed with Maxwell in New York and another redacted location, asserting they never witnessed inappropriate behavior.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity