United States Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014659.jpg
Cover page for the official court transcript of the Jury Trial in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330) held on December 21, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists appearances by the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Bobbi Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00002818.jpg
This legal filing argues against a subpoena issued by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) to BSF, claiming the requested documents are either procurable from the government or are items (boots and photographs) better produced at trial if relevant. The document specifically mentions photographs connecting the Defendant, Virginia Giuffre, and Prince Andrew at a London townhome, as well as items related to Annie and Maria Farmer.
DOJ-OGR-00017363.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated November 30, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus others). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00005652.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 386-1) is a formal request from the United States Attorney's Office (Audrey Strauss, signed by Assistants including Maurene Comey and Alison Moe) to the defense. The Government reiterates a request originally made on August 5, 2020, for reciprocal discovery regarding evidence the defendant intends to use at trial and prior statements of defense witnesses (referring to the defendant as 'she'). The document cites Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 16(b) and 26.2.
DOJ-OGR-00005543.jpg
This document is the signature page of an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez (Epstein's attorney) on October 29, 2007, and by a representative (FAUSA) for Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana on October 30, 2007, under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. The signatures for Jeffrey Epstein and Gerald Lefcourt are blank on this copy.
DOJ-OGR-00005532.jpg
This document is Page 2 of 7 of the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (headed by R. Alexander Acosta). It outlines that federal prosecution will be deferred in favor of state prosecution if Epstein abides by specific conditions. Crucially, the final paragraph grants broad immunity, stating that after fulfilling terms, no federal prosecution will occur for offenses investigated by the FBI or the Federal Grand Jury.
DOJ-OGR-00005531.jpg
This document is the first page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding Jeffrey Epstein, filed on September 25, 2017. It outlines the basis for the agreement, citing investigations by both Florida state authorities (Palm Beach Police, State Attorney's Office) and federal agencies (U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI). The investigations covered state charges of solicitation of prostitution and federal offenses related to conspiring to entice minors into prostitution between approximately 2001 and September 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00005382.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 3 of 3) of a legal filing submitted on October 26, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is signed by Damian Williams (United States Attorney) and Assistant US Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach on behalf of the Southern District of New York. The document indicates a copy was sent to Defense Counsel via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002620.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement. It contains a certification that Epstein understands the conditions of the agreement. The page is signed and dated September 24, 2007, by Gerald Lefcourt, Esq., counsel to Jeffrey Epstein. Other signature lines for R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, Jeffrey Epstein, and Lilly Ann Sanchez are present but blank on this specific copy.
DOJ-OGR-00005254.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 5) of a legal filing from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, filed on October 18, 2021 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 355). The text concludes an argument regarding jury selection (voir dire), stating that group discussion is safe and efficient. It is signed by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00005245.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated October 15, 2021. It contains a submission by the US Attorney's office followed by a 'SO ORDERED' endorsement from the Judge (Alison J. Nathan). The Judge denies a specific order requested by the defense but establishes a firm expectation that Maxwell should receive legal mail within approximately one business day to ensure she can prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005240.jpg
This is the final page (page 4) of a legal filing by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues against the defense's schedule regarding 'sensitive issues' and requests the Court maintain the October 18, 2021, deadline for Rule 412 motions (regarding admissibility of victim sexual history), or set a final deadline of October 25, 2021. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach under US Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00005236.jpg
This is the signature page (page 3 of 3) for Document 350 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 15, 2021. The document is submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York. It indicates that Defense Counsel was copied via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00005202.jpg
This document is the final signature page (Page 2 of 2) of a legal filing dated October 12, 2021, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach, with a copy sent via email to the Defense Counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00005174.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the procedures for a compensation program for claimants alleging sexual abuse by Epstein. An Administrator will evaluate each claim based on various factors, including the nature of the abuse and the claimant's credibility, even without corroborating documentation. The document details the process for making a confidential compensation offer and notes that claimants will have an opportunity to be heard by the Administrator, with accommodations made due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
DOJ-OGR-00005154.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the integrity and confidentiality protocols for a claims program. It details how the Program Administrator will verify claims to prevent fraud, including reporting suspicious claims to law enforcement, and specifies the strict confidentiality rules governing the handling of a claimant's information, particularly the limited data shared with 'the Estate' for evaluation purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00002780.jpg
This is the second page of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated March 22, 2021. The Government argues against, but ultimately agrees to comply with, defense requests to redact specific information related to Count Six of the Indictment on pages 129-134, noting the information is already public. The document is signed by US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00023348.jpg
This document is page 7 of 7 of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains the signatures executing the agreement, specifically signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña on September 27, 2007, and Epstein's counsel Gerald Lefcourt on September 24, 2007. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00023228.jpg
This document is a timeline graphic from a Department of Justice report detailing key events surrounding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) analysis in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It tracks internal DOJ communications, victim notifications, and court actions from 2006 to 2008, with an additional sidebar covering legal developments up to 2020. Key events include the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the deferral of victim notification regarding the plea deal, and subsequent court rulings finding that the U.S. violated the CVRA.
DOJ-OGR-00023194.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing a timeline of meetings between the USAO (including Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (including Dershowitz, Starr, and Lefkowitz). It covers the period from February 2007 to January 2008, categorizing meetings as 'Pre-NPA' and 'Post-NPA'. The table logs specific participants and topics, including the presentation of the NPA term sheet, discussions of investigation improprieties, and the negotiation of state plea provisions.
DOJ-OGR-00008800.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3 of 3) of a legal filing submitted on January 5, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is respectfully submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York. The document notes that Defense Counsel was copied via the Electronic Case Files (ECF) system.
DOJ-OGR-00020354.jpg
This is page 2 of a court filing by the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document addresses the Court's inquiries regarding the defendant's housing conditions at the MDC. It explains that she is housed alone due to safety concerns ('high-profile case', 'nature of charges') and her own expressed fears of the general population. It also states that the MDC cannot provide her with an eye mask because they are considered contraband, though she may use other non-contraband items to cover her eyes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017341.jpg
This document appears to be a draft statement or article dated April 2, 2012, written by a defense attorney (contextually Alan Dershowitz) defending the legal strategy regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The text details the shift from a state-level plea deal to a federal investigation initiated by dissatisfied local police, and justifies the controversial non-prosecution agreement by characterizing the federal statutes as 'draconian' and disparaging the victims as willing participants in a 'business.' The author argues the client is not truly a sex offender and expresses doubt that a victim advocacy group's lawsuit to rescind the plea deal will succeed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010569.jpg
This page of a legal filing details a specific sexual incident involving Jeffrey Epstein and a victim identified as 'S.G.', including graphic descriptions of Epstein's body. The document asserts that while 'Edwards' believes the victim count exceeds forty, evidence suggests the number of underage girls molested is in the hundreds. It also references Epstein invoking the 5th Amendment during a 2010 deposition and discusses negotiations between Epstein's legal team and the U.S. Attorney's Office to avoid federal felony charges.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity