United States Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019553.jpg
This is page 5 of a legal letter filed on August 21, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz, argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate Civil Cases should be denied. The Government asserts this is an attempt to bypass protective orders and falsely accuse the Government and an unnamed 'Recipient' of malfeasance.
DOJ-OGR-00019488.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 17) of an indictment filed on July 8, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists specific excerpts of testimony where the defendant denied giving massages to anyone, including Jeffrey Epstein and 'Minor Victim-2', and denied knowledge of Epstein's sexual activities with others. These statements are underlined and cited under Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1623 (Perjury), indicating these are the specific false declarations charged in the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00019465.jpg
This document is a court docket report from July 2020 regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). It details the filing of a superseding indictment, notices of appearance by Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), and a Pro Hac Vice motion for attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca. It also includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan setting a briefing schedule and establishing protocols for a remote arraignment and bail hearing on July 14, 2020, including teleconference access numbers and COVID-19 safety measures for physical attendance.
DOJ-OGR-00019253.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated September 9, 2020. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan detailing procedures for public and media access to hearings via phone and video feed, given COVID-19 restrictions. The docket entries list filings from mid-July 2020, including attorney appearances for Maxwell, motions regarding her detention, and a minute entry for her arraignment on July 14, 2020, where she pleaded not guilty, was denied bail, and remanded into custody.
DOJ-OGR-00017023.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and counsel for the prosecution and defense. The discussion centers on procedural matters, specifically the confirmation that trial exhibits have been made public through the U.S. Attorney's Office and the logistics of redacting sensitive information from closing argument slides in a timely manner. Counsel clarifies which version of a specific exhibit, AF-1R, is the public version.
DOJ-OGR-00016484.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 16, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman; Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00013279.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), held on December 8, 2021, in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. It lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Damian Williams) and the defense team (representing Maxwell), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00013014.jpg
Cover page of the official transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 7, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. The document lists Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (US Attorneys) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00009099.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the 'Voir Dire' (jury selection) proceedings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 16, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal teams present for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus Sternheim and Stabile).
DOJ-OGR-00009079.jpg
This document is page 12 (questionnaire page 13) of a jury questionnaire filed on February 24, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The respondent is identified as Juror ID 50. The juror answers 'No' to questions 24, 25, and 26, indicating they have not been subject to grand jury investigations, have not been a victim of a crime, and have not had legal disputes with US government agencies like the FBI or NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00031667.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2) of a faxed letter dated January 6, 2008, sent by attorney Aileen Josephs. It is copied to La Tosha Lowe, Rolando Garcia, and United States Attorney Alexander Acosta (spelled 'Alexader' in the text). The letter references an enclosure regarding a FOIA request filed in August 2006 and a response from the State.
DOJ-OGR-00031527.jpg
This document is a page from a federal legal filing (likely an indictment or information) dated via fax header to April 2006. It details charges of bank fraud against a redacted defendant who allegedly obtained a mortgage from Ohio Savings Bank in Cleveland by submitting false Verifications of Deposit and misstating the property purchase price. The document is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Nancy Vorpe Quinlan and on behalf of U.S. Attorney Guy A. Lewis.
DOJ-OGR-00019873.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing from the U.S. Government, dated July 2, 2020, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss. The prosecution argues that the defendant is an extreme flight risk and, citing several legal precedents, requests that the court deny any application for bail. The document was signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Alison Moe.
DOJ-OGR-00019802.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering dates from July 8 to July 13, 2020, regarding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details administrative motions for attorney appearances (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the filing of a superseding indictment, and specific logistical orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, including COVID-19 protocols and public access via telephone.
DOJ-OGR-00019799.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing from Case 21-58, dated March 29, 2021. It identifies the plaintiff as the USA and lists the five attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York who are representing the government. The document provides contact information, including addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses, for each attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00019778.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8-13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment, notices of appearance for Maxwell's attorneys, and memoranda regarding her detention. A significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules Maxwell's remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, and outlines procedures for public and media access during the COVID-19 pandemic.
DOJ-OGR-00019752.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 7 of 24) from July 2020 regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details procedural events including the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear (Pro Hac Vice), and a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the logistics for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The document also lists the appearances of attorneys Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00019723.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8 to July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear on Maxwell's behalf, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The order specifies how the public, press, victims, and legal counsel can access the proceedings via teleconference and limited in-person viewing.
DOJ-OGR-00019700.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 21-58, detailing legal proceedings related to Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions and notices for attorney appearances on behalf of Maxwell, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, specifies how the public, press, and involved parties can access the hearing via teleconference and limited in-person viewing due to COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00017334.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00010590.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 55) of a court filing submitted by the United States Attorney's Office on June 22, 2022, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government explicitly requests a prison sentence between 360 and 660 months (30 to 55 years) citing the magnitude of her crimes involving the sexual exploitation of young girls.
DOJ-OGR-00010524.jpg
A court order filed on June 17, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules the sentencing for June 28, 2022, at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York and outlines logistics for press, public, and victim access, while prohibiting electronic devices and telephone dial-in access.
DOJ-OGR-00010417.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 2 of 2) of a court filing submitted on May 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It is submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach from the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00010415.jpg
This is the signature page (page 2) of a legal document filed on May 11, 2022, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal trial). It lists Damian Williams as the United States Attorney, with specific signatures from Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach representing the Southern District of New York. The document indicates a copy was sent to the Defense Counsel via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00010323.jpg
This is the second page of a legal filing (Document 652) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 1, 2022. The document is an opposition by the US Government to a motion for a stay, arguing it is based only on the defendant's conjecture. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity