United States Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000302.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a handwritten signature and date (10/29/07) by Gerald Lefcourt, Epstein's counsel. The text certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the agreement and agrees to comply, although Epstein's own signature line is blank on this specific page. The document was later filed in court in 2016 and 2019 as indicated by the headers.
DOJ-OGR-00000299.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It features the signature of his attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated September 24, 2007. The document lists other key legal figures including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt, certifying that Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000298.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It features the handwritten signatures of Jeffrey Epstein and his lawyer Gerald Lefcourt, dated September 24, 2007, alongside certifications that Epstein understood the agreement's conditions. The document also lists U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana, though their signatures are not present on this specific page.
DOJ-OGR-00000297.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It features Epstein's signature dated September 24, 2007, alongside signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Epstein's defense team, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000292.jpg
This document is a page from a legal agreement detailing a deferred prosecution deal for Epstein. Under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida for sex trafficking offenses will be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida. The agreement stipulates that if Epstein violates its terms, federal prosecution can be initiated, but if he complies, all charges related to the joint FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office investigation will be dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00000291.jpg
This document is the first page of the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines that the Palm Beach Police, State Attorney's Office, U.S. Attorney's Office, and FBI investigated Epstein for offenses occurring between 2001 and 2007. The document lists four specific federal offenses involving conspiracy, interstate commerce, and the enticement of minor females for prostitution and illicit sexual conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00000280.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 11, 2019, details the legal proceedings and agreements surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses the jurisdictional complexities of his alleged crimes, the government's efforts to prosecute him despite a nonprosecution agreement (NPA) entered into with the USAO-SDFL in 2007, and the defense's arguments against the notion of flight risk, citing Epstein's history of international travel with returns to the U.S. and his intent to contest charges.
DOJ-OGR-00000272.jpg
This is an Unsealing Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated and filed on July 8, 2019. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, grants the application by the U.S. Attorney's Office to unseal the indictment in the criminal case of the United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. This legal action officially made the federal charges against Epstein public.
DOJ-OGR-00000270.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Indictment) dated July 2, 2019, for Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (the Jeffrey Epstein case). It outlines the 'Substitute Asset Provision,' stating the government's intent to seize other property from the defendant if the primary forfeitable assets are missing, transferred, or devalued. The document is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman.
DOJ-OGR-00000011.jpg
This page from a legal filing (likely an appellate opinion) rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) prevents her prosecution in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The court cites *United States v. Annabi* to conclude that the NPA was expressly limited to the Southern District of Florida and did not bind other districts like SDNY. Footnotes discuss legal precedents regarding plea agreements and double jeopardy.
DOJ-OGR-00020807.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It contains a statement certifying that Epstein understands the clarifications to the NPA and agrees to comply. The document is signed by Gerald Lefcourt (Epstein's counsel) on October 29, 2007, and by a representative of the U.S. Attorney's Office (marked FAUSA) on October 30, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00020804.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a statement certifying Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions. While signature blocks exist for Epstein, R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt, only Lilly Ann Sanchez (Attorney for Epstein) has signed and dated the document (9-24-07).
DOJ-OGR-00020797.jpg
This page is part of a legal agreement detailing the terms under which the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, R. Alexander Acosta, agrees to defer federal prosecution of Epstein. The deferral is in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, contingent upon Epstein's compliance with the agreement's conditions. The document also outlines the procedure for initiating federal prosecution, including a notice period, should Epstein violate the terms.
DOJ-OGR-00020796.jpg
This document is the first page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines that the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney's Office investigated Epstein, leading to state charges for solicitation of prostitution. Simultaneously, the US Attorney's Office and FBI investigated federal offenses committed between 2001 and 2007, specifically focusing on conspiracy to traffic minor females across state lines for prostitution and illicit sexual conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00020758.jpg
This document is page 23 of 24 from a legal filing (Document 187) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 29, 2021. It details the 'Substitute Asset Provision,' outlining the government's intent to seize alternative property from the defendant if the original proceeds of the alleged crimes (specifically Count Six) cannot be located, have been transferred, or diminished in value. The document is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and United States Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00020721.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket report (Case 22-1426) dated June 2022, detailing procedural orders leading up to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders establishing strict protocols for victim impact statements, including deadlines for submission and objections, and prohibits electronic devices in the courtroom. It also notes letters from defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim and attorney Robert Lewis, and issues a correction regarding the contact information for Victim Witness Unit Coordinator Wendy Olsen.
DOJ-OGR-00020631.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 22, 2023, but detailing events from July 2020. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding public and press access to hearings, followed by a list of filings such as attorney appearances and motions. The key event is a minute entry for Maxwell's arraignment on July 14, 2020, where she pleaded not guilty via video conference, was denied bail, and had a trial date set for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020602.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on January 12, 2023, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 22-1426). Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, John M. Leventhal, is requesting an unopposed extension of time to file her appellate brief, moving the deadline from January 30, 2023, to February 28, 2023, citing unforeseen circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00020575.jpg
This document contains several letters and orders related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The orders concern victim impact statements, redactions, and contact information, while the letters are from Ghislaine Maxwell, her defense counsel, and the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding various aspects of the case, including sentencing and challenges to standing under the CVRA.
DOJ-OGR-00020495.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket covering proceedings between July 7 and July 9, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the official appearances of Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders regarding speedy trial exclusions and victim rights. It also schedules a remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, providing public access dial-in numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00020474.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 detailing procedural filings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the submission and deadline protocols for victim impact statements under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Submissions from both the defense (Bobbi Sternheim) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, et al.) are logged, primarily concerning victim notifications and objections to statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020473.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings and orders between May 10, 2022, and June 21, 2022. It details pre-sentencing motions, including a denied request for an extension by the defense and granted motions regarding Speedy Trial Exclusion. Significant entries include logistical orders for the June 28, 2022 sentencing hearing and strict protocols for victim impact statements under the Crime Victims Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00020394.jpg
This document is a court docket page from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the formal appearance of her defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The document also outlines logistics for public access to the hearing via telephone and addresses victim rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg
Cover page for a court transcript of the jury trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 10, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). Law enforcement representatives from the FBI and NYPD were also noted as present.
DOJ-OGR-00015210.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to the admissibility of Palm Beach County School records. It confirms that witness Dominique Hyppolite would verify the records' authenticity and identifies specific exhibits (DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, J-2) related to a redacted individual and a witness identified as 'Jane'. The document itself is marked as Defense Exhibit DH-4.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity