United States Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010306.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 16 of 16) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated March 15, 2022. The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should be denied based on reasons in the Government's memorandum. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and four Assistant US Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00009987.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript where an individual named Brune is being questioned. Brune confirms having worked for the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York, leaving in November 1997 to start the law firm 'Brune & Richard' with Hillary Richard on February 2, 1998. Brune also clarifies that their partner, Hillary Richard, is primarily a civil lawyer.
DOJ-OGR-00009847.jpg
This is the signature page (Conclusion) of a legal document filed by the United States Attorney's Office in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The prosecution requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record and instead schedule a hearing to resolve the motion. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and four Assistant US Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00009770.jpg
This document is page 13 of a completed juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on March 24, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The juror answered 'No' to questions regarding whether they or their family have been subjects of grand jury investigations, victims of crimes, or parties to legal disputes involving US government agencies like the FBI or NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00009637.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 635) dated March 1, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains proposed questions for a juror regarding potential bias against Maxwell and their ability to be fair. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00009631.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 6 of 8) of a legal filing (Document 632) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated March 7, 2022. It is signed by Assistant United States Attorney Lara Pomerantz in New York, requesting that a specific application be granted and certifying that no prior request for this relief had been made.
DOJ-OGR-00009627.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the Southern District of New York, signed by US Attorney Damian Williams on March 7, 2022. It requests the Court to issue an order compelling a redacted individual to testify at a March 8, 2022 hearing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The request is made pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003, which typically relate to granting immunity to witnesses to compel testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00009308.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The testimony covers Brune's professional background, specifically leaving the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York in November 1997 to start the law firm Brune & Richard with Hillary Richard in February 1998. The witness confirms that while Hillary Richard has done criminal cases, she is primarily a civil lawyer.
DOJ-OGR-00003219.jpg
This document details a May 2006 meeting where the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) presented the Epstein case to federal authorities (FBI and USAO/Villafaña) due to concerns that the State Attorney (Krischer) was bowing to pressure from Epstein's legal team. The report outlines obstruction tactics used by Epstein's defense, including hiring PIs to trail police, orchestrating conflicts of interest to remove aggressive prosecutors, and potentially obtaining tips about search warrants. It also discusses the legal strategy for federal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2423, citing flight logs listing anonymous 'females' as potential evidence of interstate trafficking.
DOJ-OGR-00003208.jpg
This document details the professional background of AUSA Ann Marie C. Villafaña, focusing on her role as the lead prosecutor in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation starting in 2006. It clarifies that while Alexander Acosta made the decision to use a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), Villafaña was the primary negotiator with Epstein's counsel and drafted the agreement. The text also outlines the timeline of the investigation, the subsequent CVRA litigation, and the eventual finding of government misconduct in 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00003207.jpg
This document, page 31 of a DOJ report (likely the OGR report), details the professional biographies and specific roles of USAO officials Jeffrey Sloman, Matthew Menchel, and Andrew Lourie in the Epstein investigation and the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights Sloman's negotiation of an NPA addendum, Menchel's communication of the two-year plea deal, and Lourie's role in the NPA negotiations before his departure. The text also notes Alexander Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019 due to criticism regarding the Epstein case.
DOJ-OGR-00004750.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a sentencing hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) held on June 15, 2021. The Court reviews sentencing parameters, including a 40-year statutory maximum and $5 million fine, and lists reviewed documents such as a presentence report by Officer Sandra Vella Garcia, a plea agreement, and sentencing memos from both the government and defense attorney Mr. Donaldson. Attorneys Mr. Chiuchiolo (Government) and Mr. Donaldson (Defense) confirm there are no other written submissions to review.
DOJ-OGR-00004748.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a videoconference hearing held on April 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Tiffany Days (Case No. 19 CR 0619). Tiffany Days was one of the prison guards charged with falsifying records on the night Jeffrey Epstein died. Notably, the header indicates this document was filed on June 15, 2021, as Document 300 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which is the case number for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting this transcript was used as an exhibit or filing in the Maxwell trial.
DOJ-OGR-00004699.jpg
This legal document, part of an affidavit by an Assistant U.S. Attorney, describes the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein that began in 2006. It focuses on the process of notifying victims, specifically mentioning letters sent by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI to victims C.W., T.M., and S.R. The document confirms these three individuals, represented by attorney Bradley Edwards, were minor victims of Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00004661.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the NPA. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez (Epstein's attorney) on October 29, 2007, and by a First Assistant U.S. Attorney (FAUSA) on behalf of A. Marie Villafaña on October 30, 2007; Epstein's and Gerald Lefcourt's signature lines are present but blank.
DOJ-OGR-00004655.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It features Jeffrey Epstein's signature dated September 24, 2007, acknowledging he understands the conditions of the agreement. The document lists R. Alexander Acosta (U.S. Attorney) and Epstein's defense counsel, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, though they have not signed this specific copy.
DOJ-OGR-00004650.jpg
This document outlines the terms of a legal agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and Epstein, deferring federal prosecution in favor of state prosecution in Florida. It specifies conditions Epstein must follow, consequences for violating the agreement, and the promise of dismissal of charges upon successful fulfillment of terms. The agreement is authorized by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta.
DOJ-OGR-00004649.jpg
This document is the first page of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the investigations conducted by the Palm Beach Police, the State Attorney's Office, the US Attorney's Office, and the FBI covering the period from 2001 to September 2007. It explicitly details the federal crimes the investigation uncovered, including conspiracy to traffic minor females for prostitution and traveling in interstate commerce for illicit sexual conduct with minors (violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422, 2423, and 371).
DOJ-OGR-00004635.jpg
This document is the final signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. While signature blocks are prepared for Jeffrey Epstein, Gerald Lefcourt, R. Alexander Acosta, and A. Marie Villafaña, the only executed signature visible is that of Lilly Ann Sanchez, Attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, dated September 24, 2007. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004633.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains Epstein's signature and the handwritten date 9/24/07. The page also lists R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez as parties to the agreement, though their signatures are not present on this specific page copy. The header indicates this document was filed in court on 05/25/21 as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
DOJ-OGR-00004628.jpg
This document is page two of a legal agreement outlining the deferral of federal prosecution against Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, the federal case will be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided Epstein adheres to the agreement's conditions. The text also specifies the procedures for initiating federal prosecution should Epstein violate the terms.
DOJ-OGR-00004598.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal decision-making process regarding the notification of victims in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights that prosecutors (Villafaña, Acosta) deliberately chose not to inform victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) or their rights to damages, citing concerns that doing so would compromise the victims' credibility as witnesses and give the appearance of financial motivation. The document specifically references interviews with victim Courtney Wild and others in early 2008 where the existence of the signed NPA was withheld.
DOJ-OGR-00023142.jpg
This document is page 104 of a DOJ report detailing the organizational structure of the Criminal Division and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General in early 2008. It describes a specific interaction on February 21, 2008, where CEOS Chief Andrew Oosterbaan communicated with defense attorney Lefkowitz, offering to have CEOS take a 'fresh and objective look' at the case rather than partnering directly with the USAO. This conversation occurred shortly after a CEOS Trial Attorney had met with victims.
DOJ-OGR-00014717.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 28, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (led by US Attorney Damian Williams) and the defense team (including attorneys from Haddon Morgan and Foreman and Cohen & Gresser). Also noted as present are representatives from the FBI and NYPD.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity