JOHNSON
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Burton
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kennedy (Jack)
|
Political running mates |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jackie Kennedy
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth A. Marra
|
Judicial review |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Inmate Johnson moved from KN to ZA | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Inmate Johnson #50972-054 placed in Administrative Detention for SIS Investigation. | Unit KN | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Johnson v. U.S. | Supreme Court | View |
| 1991-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case cited: Burton v. Johnson, 948 F.2d 1150 (10th Cir. 1991). | N/A | View |
| 1960-01-01 | N/A | Democratic Nomination | USA | View |
| 1960-01-01 | N/A | Selection of Running Mate | USA | View |
EFTA00033707.pdf
Bureau of Prisons Daily Lieutenant's Log for MCC New York dated August 5, 2019. The log notes critical infrastructure failures including an inoperable fire alarm/pump system and a malfunctioning public address system just days before Jeffrey Epstein's death. It lists inmate movements, counts, and notes that an inmate named Benjamin (not Epstein's ID) was on suicide watch with an inmate companion.
EFTA00014185.pdf
Order from the U.S. District Court (Southern District of Florida) dated August 4, 2008, denying Jeffrey Epstein's motion to file a reply brief under seal in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that the public interest in access to court records outweighed the U.S. Attorney's objections and the confidentiality clause in Epstein's agreement with the government, ordering the Clerk to unseal relevant docket entries.
DOJ-OGR-00022628.tif
This document is an index or glossary, listing various words and names along with corresponding page numbers where they appear. It includes names like Joe, John, Johnson, James, Jane, Jason, Jean-Luc, Jeffrey, Jerry, Jimmy, Julian, Kennedy, Kenny, Kerry, Klein, and Kong, suggesting it's an index for a larger document like a testimony transcript or report. The footer indicates 'DOJ-OGR-00022628' and 'MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES'.
DOJ-OGR-00000306.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed by the United States government in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The U.S. requests the dismissal of a petition filed by 'Jane Doe #1' and 'Jane Doe #2' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The primary argument for dismissal is that the court lacks the subject matter jurisdiction required to hear the case.
DOJ-OGR-00030392.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a motion for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion requests that the court order the witness's deposition for an unspecified criminal case and the civil case 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein' to be conducted simultaneously. The stated purpose is to prevent potential harassment of the witness by the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00030390.jpg
This document is a 'Motion for Protective Order' filed in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, in the case of State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein. The motion is filed by a witness/victim identified anonymously as 'Y. Doe' (also 'Jane Doe No. 3' in a federal civil case), requesting that her deposition scheduled for April 2, 2008, in the criminal case be conducted simultaneously with her deposition for the civil case. The document explicitly states that Y. Doe alleges she was sexually assaulted by Epstein when she was 16 years old.
DOJ-OGR-00021054.jpg
This document is page 'vi' (Page 7 of 113) of a legal filing dated February 28, 2023, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00021054. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents referenced in the main brief, including cases such as 'Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S.' and 'Martin v. Hadix'. The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice filing, likely related to a FOIA case or appeal given the OGR marking.
DOJ-OGR-00020977.jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis of a defendant's (Maxwell's) claim that one of the jurors, Juror 50, was biased. The defendant cites other legal cases (Afshar, Burton) to support the claim, but the court distinguishes the facts and finds Juror 50 was not biased, noting his credible testimony about his past abuse. The court also dismisses the argument that Juror 50's post-trial interviews and social media activity are evidence of bias.
DOJ-OGR-00002329(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, presents an analysis by a 'Mr. Martin' concerning the underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors. The analysis compares the demographic composition of the 'White Plains qualified wheel' (juror pool) to the eligible juror populations of the Manhattan Division and the entire Southern District of New York, finding significant disparities. This argument is being made in the context of a case involving 'Epstein's New York residence,' which is located in the Manhattan Division.
DOJ-OGR-00002323.jpg
This document is page 3 (Table of Authorities) of a legal filing (Document 126) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists legal precedents (cases) and statutes cited in the brief, including Supreme Court cases like Duren v. Missouri and Second Circuit cases like United States v. Jackman. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002323.
DOJ-OGR-00002323(1).jpg
This document is page 'ii' (labeled Page 3 of 13 in the PDF) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (Cases) and Statutes cited elsewhere in the filing. The citations heavily reference cases involving jury selection and fair representation (e.g., Duren v. Missouri, Taylor v. Louisiana), suggesting the main document likely involves a motion regarding jury composition or selection.
DOJ-OGR-00030433.jpg
This is the first page of a civil complaint filed on January 24, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-80069). The plaintiffs are a minor identified as Jane Doe No. 1, along with her father and stepmother, filing against Jeffrey Epstein. The complaint alleges sexual assault and abuse, noting that fictitious names are used to protect the minor's identity.
DOJ-OGR-00021746.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 87, Case 22-1426) dated July 27, 2023. It contains a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (cases) and the page numbers on which they appear in the full brief. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00021746).
DOJ-OGR-00021112.jpg
This document is page 65 of a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on February 28, 2023. The text presents a legal argument regarding statutory interpretation, specifically debating whether a 'categorical approach' or a 'case-specific approach' should apply to 8 U.S.C. § 3283. The brief argues that the District Court erred by using a case-specific approach, citing conflicts with Supreme Court precedents such as *Nijhawan v. Holder*, *James v. U.S.*, and *Kawashima*.
DOJ-OGR-00009005.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 613) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (cases) cited in the main document, ranging from 1933 to 2022. Notably, it cites 'Brown v. Maxwell' (2019), a case directly involving the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00031565.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a request for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion asks the court to require that depositions for a criminal case and a civil case, 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein', be conducted at the same time to prevent harassment of the witness by Defendant Epstein. The filing states that counsel for the State and for Epstein were contacted about this request but have not responded.
DOJ-OGR-00031523.jpg
This document is a criminal 'Information' filed on September 26, 2000, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, case number 00-8124CR-HURLEY. The United States Attorney charges a defendant (name redacted), a resident of Palm Beach County and a registered mortgage broker, in connection with the activities of Mortgage Express, Inc., a Florida-based mortgage brokerage. The charges fall under federal statutes 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1344, and 2.
DOJ-OGR-00010182.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text captures an attorney's argument concerning 'ineffective assistance' of counsel, specifically debating whether keeping a specific juror—who was a suspended lawyer—was a strategic choice or a 'tragic misjudgment.' The latter half of the page shifts to discussing financial transactions executed in February or March specifically to generate tax losses.
DOJ-OGR-00009696.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal document filed on March 11, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It lists numerous legal cases, with decision dates ranging from 1933 to 2022, which are cited as legal precedent in the main filing. Each entry includes the case name, citation, and the page number(s) where it is referenced in the document.
DOJ-OGR-00005797.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated October 29, 2021. The text argues for the admissibility of expert testimony regarding 'grooming' and the psychological relationship between sexual abuse victims and perpetrators, citing numerous appellate court precedents (9th, 8th, 10th, 5th, and 2nd Circuits) to support the validity/relevance of such testimony. The filing notes that the defendant is attempting to rely on a single contrary case from the District of Maine.
DOJ-OGR-00005869.jpg
This document is page 2 of an exhibit filed on October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains the first page of an academic article titled 'The Construct of Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse: Conceptual and Measurement Issues' published in the Journal of Child Sexual Abuse in 2014. The text defines grooming as a 'seduction stage' used to gain access to victims and discusses the need for a scientific definition of the term. It bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00005869).
DOJ-OGR-00002834.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 189) in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC), filed on March 24, 2021. The text discusses a legal dispute regarding jury selection venues, specifically distinguishing the current case from *United States v. Johnson*. The court argues that unlike in *Johnson*, Schulte's grand and petit juries were drawn from different courthouses, invalidating his argument regarding the 'relevant community' for the jury pool. The document mentions the 'underrepresentation analysis' and the 'absolute disparity method' for assessing jury fairness. While comprised in a dataset potentially related to Epstein, the text explicitly concerns Joshua Schulte (likely the CIA Vault 7 case).
DOJ-OGR-00005220.jpg
This page from a legal document, filed on October 13, 2021, discusses the court's authority to manage the jury selection process known as voir dire. It argues that while the court can reasonably limit the time and scope of questioning by attorneys to prevent abuse, the unique circumstances of this case, including extensive pretrial publicity, necessitate an expansion of traditional voir dire protocols to effectively screen potential jurors for bias and prejudice.
DOJ-OGR-00005192.jpg
Handwritten legal notes analyzing the scope of Section 3283's "offense involving" language, discussing its application to repealed offenses and specific statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 113(a) and Chapter 109A. The text cites case law including United States v. Johnson, Miller v. United States, and United States v. Kepler to explore jurisdictional limits and the definition of conduct involving abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing, marked with Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368. It lists various legal precedents and case citations, primarily focusing on litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, sovereign immunity, and international liability (Alien Tort Statute). While the document is part of a collection likely reviewed by the House Oversight Committee (possibly related to an investigation involving Epstein or similar legal themes of jurisdiction/immunity), this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity