MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013721.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a weekend trip the witness took to New Mexico, specifically probing whether Ghislaine Maxwell transported them. The witness denies having personal knowledge of Ghislaine's involvement and confirms that the trip was over a weekend, a fact they discussed with their mother and disclosed to the government.
DOJ-OGR-00013664.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from a case identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer, who is questioned about a past settlement received from a fund, the dismissal of a lawsuit against Maxwell and Epstein, and whether their civil case is concluded. A. Farmer confirms the civil case is over, they do not expect more money, and have no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00013662.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer. The witness explains their motivation for testifying was to seek accountability, and confirms they were interviewed by law enforcement in New York in 2019 and have met with the government five or six times since. The witness also confirms having previously sued individuals named Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013661.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The witness testifies about speaking to the media regarding their experiences with Maxwell and Epstein, confirming interviews with the FBI in 2006/2007 and with reporters in 2016 and 2019, for which they were not paid. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects to a question about the witness's difficulty in speaking publicly, but the objection is overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00013660.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms having experiences with Epstein and Maxwell, which they first discussed with the media in 2002 and later with the FBI in 2006 or 2007. During the FBI interview, the witness reported that Maxwell had given them a massage and Epstein had gotten into bed with them.
DOJ-OGR-00013659.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, also referred to as Annie. Annie discusses events from 1996, including a trip to Thailand and Vietnam, a conversation with her mother about not being raped, and her relationship with Dave Mulligan, to whom she also disclosed incidents involving Maxwell and Epstein at 'the ranch.'
DOJ-OGR-00013655.jpg
This court transcript details the testimony of a witness, A. Farmer, regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Epstein. Farmer describes feeling conflicted, being grateful for a trip they funded but also deeply disturbed by an uncomfortable experience with them in New Mexico, which made her want to avoid them permanently. She also testifies that the first person she told about the uncomfortable incident, without giving details, was her mother.
DOJ-OGR-00013652.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The witness describes flying home commercially to Phoenix, Arizona, and explains she did not write about her trip to New Mexico in her journal because she wanted to forget what happened there. She also confirms keeping boots that were purchased for her by Maxwell and Epstein during that trip, which were later packed away when her mother moved.
DOJ-OGR-00013651.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as 'A. Farmer'. Farmer recounts her last day at a ranch in New Mexico with Epstein and Maxwell, describing a feeling of disorientation as their interest in her seemed different from the academic support she expected. She details a final conversation where she tried to discuss her studies with Maxwell, who appeared completely disinterested, before saying goodbye to both of them and leaving.
DOJ-OGR-00013648.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Farmer testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell set up a portable massage table in Farmer's room, instructed her to undress completely, and then touched her breasts inappropriately during the massage.
DOJ-OGR-00013645.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of A. Farmer's direct examination, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness recounts going to a movie theater in New Mexico with Epstein and Maxwell to see 'Primal Fear', describing odd, playful behavior between Epstein and Maxwell. Farmer testifies that throughout the movie, Epstein inappropriately touched her hand, foot, and arm in a 'blatant' manner, which she contrasts with his more concealed behavior in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00013644.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as Farmer. She recounts being gifted expensive cowboy boots and subsequently going to the movies with Maxwell and Epstein. Farmer expresses initial hesitation about the movie outing due to a prior negative experience in a New York theater, but states she went because she believed it would be different with Maxwell present.
DOJ-OGR-00013642.jpg
This document is a transcript of court testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. Farmer describes a weekend she spent as a teenager at a ranch with Epstein and Maxwell, noting that no other guests were present. She recounts her mixed feelings about the situation and describes her first impression of Maxwell as outgoing and seemingly expecting her arrival.
DOJ-OGR-00013641.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about her observations of Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, stating her belief that they were 'romantic partners' based on their intimate behavior. Farmer confirms that she, Epstein, and Maxwell were the only individuals staying in a small residence on the property.
DOJ-OGR-00013636.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument over the admissibility of hearsay testimony during the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorneys debate with the judge how to question the witness about why she was willing to see Jeffrey Epstein again, despite her discomfort, focusing on a conversation with her mother about Maxwell's presence. The discussion revolves around whether this testimony is offered for the truth of the matter asserted or to explain the witness's state of mind.
DOJ-OGR-00013619.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about a trip to New York after Christmas 1995, where she stayed with her sister for about a week and met Jeffrey Epstein twice. The witness is also asked to identify 'Government Exhibit 101', which she confirms is her high school photo from her junior year.
DOJ-OGR-00013614.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named Annie Farmer identifies the defendant, Maxwell, in the courtroom and testifies that Maxwell gave her a massage when she was 16 years old. At that time, Farmer was living in Arizona with her mother and sister, Ashley.
DOJ-OGR-00013373.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Ms. Hesse testifies that she knew women came to a residence to give massages, even when Maxwell was absent, and that she took messages for them. She also confirms knowing about Maxwell's home in New York but denies any knowledge of a residence in Miami.
DOJ-OGR-00013369.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse. The questioning, led by Ms. Moe, first confirms the name 'Carolyn' on an exhibit and then establishes that Mrs. Hesse's job was to work at the Palm Beach house specifically when Maxwell and Epstein were not there.
DOJ-OGR-00013344.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Mrs. Hesse. Hesse describes being instructed by Ghislaine (Maxwell) to record all phone messages in a specific notebook kept in the kitchen whenever Epstein and Maxwell were away from the house. The attorney, Ms. Moe, then presents Government Exhibits to the witness for identification.
DOJ-OGR-00010723.jpg
This document is a personal statement from a victim of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, filed as part of a legal case. The author describes the severe, long-term physical (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome) and psychological trauma they endured, and their journey toward healing through therapy. The arrests of Epstein and Maxwell provided a sense of validation, prompting the author to attend Maxwell's trial in Manhattan to seek justice and closure for the abuse that derailed their life for over two decades.
DOJ-OGR-00010721.jpg
This legal document is a victim's statement detailing her experience with Epstein and Maxwell. The narrator recounts being offered a job, which she declined, leading to anger from Maxwell. Later, Maxwell re-established contact, manipulated the narrator into a trip to Florida that cost her her job, and then began a three-year period of trafficking, rape, and assault in New York and Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00010711.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing dated June 23, 2022, regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that victims named Sarah and Elizabeth should be entitled to deliver oral victim impact statements at the sentencing. The filing requests that if the Court doubts this entitlement, they be granted more time to brief the issue, noting they only had 48 hours to respond to a previous court order.
DOJ-OGR-00010710.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that victims identified as Sarah and Elizabeth should be permitted to read their victim impact statements aloud at Maxwell's criminal sentencing. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Wilson and Kelly v. California, to support the court's authority to consider such testimony and asserts that doing so will not cause unfair prejudice to Maxwell. A footnote clarifies that Maxwell does not have the right to cross-examine victims during sentencing hearings.
DOJ-OGR-00010705.jpg
This page from a legal document discusses the psychological impact of crime on victims, citing academic research on PTSD and other traumas. It highlights the therapeutic value of victim impact statements in sentencing, referencing a study from Australia. The document concludes by stating that victims named Sarah and Elizabeth have already benefited from the prosecution and conviction of an individual named Maxwell.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Ms. Maxwell's sleeping conditions
Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan asking the District Court to address her sleeping conditions by directing the MDC to cease 15-minute light surveillance or justify its necessity.
Bail Application
On February 23, 2021, Maxwell filed a bail application proposing two additional bail conditions.
Appeal of Judge Nathan's Order
Maxwell filed a notice of appeal from the Order denying her motion.
In support of her motion
Maxwell filed a reply to support her motion.
Phone Message
PLEASE CALL WHEN POSSIBLE
Availability Information
A message was taken for Mr Epstein at 7:50 AM from Maxwell, stating that a redacted person is available on Tuesday and 'NO ONE FOR TOMORROW'.
Personal life and travel
Carolyn and Maxwell had conversations at Epstein's house about sex toys, her future, her upbringing, her alcoholic mother, a person named Karen who was molested, and a travel invitation which Carolyn declined.
Finding the narrator's location
When the narrator asked Maxwell how she found her at Bloomingdales, Maxwell stated that she had asked the narrator's former colleagues at Henri Bendel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity