MAXWELL

Person
Mentions
1792
Relationships
402
Events
856
Documents
868
Also known as:
mother of the Maxwell siblings

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
402 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person CAROLYN
Exploitative
6
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Co conspirators
6
2
View
person Jane
Groomer victim
6
2
View
person Jane
Adversarial defendant victim
6
2
View
organization RRA
Professional affiliation
6
1
View
person inmates at the MDC
Professional tutor student
6
1
View
person Kate
Friend
6
2
View
person Annie
Groomer victim
6
2
View
person Natalya
Professional criminal enterprise
6
1
View
person Ms. Ransome
Victim perpetrator
6
1
View
person Kate
Groomer victim
6
2
View
person A. Farmer
Friend
6
2
View
person A. Farmer
Business associate
6
2
View
person Minor Victim-2
Groomer victim
6
2
View
person JANE
Exploitative
6
1
View
person Unnamed speaker
Victim abuser
6
2
View
person Annie
Involved in incident
6
1
View
person Kate
Facilitator
6
1
View
person Employees
Employee
6
1
View
person Epstein
Conspiratorial
6
2
View
person CAROLYN
Unspecified
6
1
View
person Martindell
Professional
6
1
View
person Guiffre
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Epstein
Co conspirators alleged
6
2
View
person CAROLYN
Recruiter victim
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal proceeding The 'Doe case' was stayed to avoid adversely affecting an ongoing criminal prosecution against Ma... N/A View
N/A Trip A witness (A. Farmer) stayed at a ranch with Epstein and Maxwell. the ranch View
N/A Conversation Kate and Maxwell discussed Kate's family situation, including her mother's illness. Maxwell's townhouse View
N/A Conversation Kate and Maxwell discussed Kate's future plans, including her offer to study law at Oxford Univer... Maxwell's townhouse View
N/A Legal proceeding Maxwell lied under oath during a civil deposition to conceal her crimes, specifically regarding h... N/A View
N/A Legal action A Superseding Indictment (S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)) was filed, charging Maxwell with eight counts, inc... N/A View
N/A N/A Defendant met victim and asked her to give massages. The house View
N/A Trial A four-and-a-half-week jury trial was held where the Government presented evidence of sexual abus... N/A View
N/A Legal ruling Judge Nathan entered a 'challenged Order' denying Maxwell's request to use criminal discovery mat... N/A View
N/A Legal action Maxwell filed a motion to modify a Protective Order and subsequently appealed the denial. N/A View
N/A Legal action The Government charged Maxwell with perjury in connection with civil cases. N/A View
N/A Trip Maxwell and Mr. Epstein would be "out of town and be flying in" when appointments were scheduled ... N/A View
N/A Trial The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where this summation was delivered. Southern District Court (im... View
N/A Scheduling Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages. This is related to counts Five and Six. New York View
N/A Legal proceeding An appeal by Maxwell regarding an Order to prevent documents in a civil case from being unsealed. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A pending criminal case involving the parties. District Court View
N/A Trip The narrator visited Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. private island in the U.S. ... View
N/A Abuse The narrator was subjected to sexual predation multiple times per day over a period of seven to e... New York mansion and privat... View
N/A Crime Maxwell transported Jane to New York for sexual abuse and conspired to do the same. New York View
N/A Trial Maxwell's criminal trial, for which she received evidence (notes of Jane's interview) over three ... N/A View
N/A Sentencing The District Court sentenced Maxwell to 240 months' imprisonment, which was slightly above the Gu... District Court View
N/A Crime Epstein and the Defendant (Maxwell) groomed victims for abuse at various properties and in variou... various properties and in v... View
N/A Attempted college application The author wrote an application to FIT, which was controlled and ultimately never submitted by Ma... N/A View
N/A Legal ruling A court holds that the District Court did not err in applying a leadership enhancement or in expl... N/A View
N/A Interview Upon her arrest, the defendant was interviewed by Pretrial Services and allegedly lied about her ... N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00017074.jpg

This document is a legal summation from a court case, outlining Ghislaine Maxwell's role in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation from 1995 to 2004. It details how Maxwell recruited, groomed, and abused multiple young women, including Jane, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn, across various locations like New Mexico and Palm Beach. The text also highlights significant financial payments from Epstein to Maxwell, totaling over $23 million, and describes the evolution of the abuse into a 'pyramid scheme' where victims were incentivized to recruit others.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017073.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal summation by 'Ms. Moe', likely a prosecutor, arguing for the guilt of Maxwell. The speaker details over $30 million in payments from Jeffrey Epstein to Maxwell between 1999 and 2007, positing that this money was payment for Maxwell's role as a coconspirator in Epstein's sexual abuse of underage girls. The argument connects these payments to a timeline of abuse starting in 1994 with victims identified as 'Jane' and 'Kate'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017072.jpg

This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe in the trial of Maxwell. The prosecution argues that Maxwell is guilty, citing a 'pyramid scheme' to recruit underage girls for sexual abuse, a 'little black book' containing victim names as evidence of her knowledge, and a significant financial motive. The summation states that Jeffrey Epstein paid Maxwell approximately $30 million between 1999 and 2007 for her role as his 'partner in crime'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017070.jpg

This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell's contact book entries for 'massages' were not legitimate, using the entry for Virginia Roberts as a key example. She connects Maxwell to Virginia through her father, Sky Roberts, an employee at Mar-a-Lago where they met, and through flight records showing Virginia flew with Maxwell when she was 17.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017069.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Ms. Moe describes a 'household manual' belonging to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, which she characterizes as a 'powerfully incriminating document' and a 'little black book'. She highlights that multiple copies existed and points to a specific page from Government Exhibit 52-G, titled 'Massage Florida,' noting the suspiciously large number of female names as evidence of wrongdoing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017067.jpg

This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe, arguing that Maxwell was integral to Epstein's operation. The argument uses evidence like FedEx records from 2002 showing Maxwell sending packages from Epstein's office, and corroborates the testimony of a witness, Carolyn, who received packages from Epstein at age 15, using phone messages she left at Epstein's Palm Beach house in 2004.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017065.jpg

This document is a summation by Ms. Moe in a legal case against Maxwell. It recounts the testimony of a witness named Carolyn, who stated that in 2001 at age 14, Maxwell recruited her for 'sexualized massages' at Jeffrey Epstein's house. The summation highlights corroborating testimony from Carolyn's then-boyfriend, Sean, and details conversations between Maxwell and Carolyn about her personal life, which were seemingly aimed at grooming her for travel and further exploitation.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017063.jpg

This document contains a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Moe in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details testimony from a witness named Carolyn regarding interactions with Virginia, Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, describing sexual acts that occurred in a massage room. The speaker also describes the physical layout of the room, including nude drawings and furniture, characterizing it as a site of sexual abuse.

Court transcript / legal summation
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017058.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor. She argues that the defendant, Maxwell, engaged in 'classic grooming behavior' by teaching young girls, including Annie and Kate, to give foot massages to Epstein. This act is presented as a deliberate method to break down boundaries and facilitate abuse, not as an innocent mentoring activity.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017055.jpg

This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues for Maxwell's guilt by recounting the testimonies of two victims, 'Jane' and 'Annie Farmer'. The summary details how Jane's testimony of sexual exploitation by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein was corroborated, and describes Epstein's initial grooming of a 16-year-old Annie Farmer in 1995, presenting these as part of a consistent 'playbook' of abuse.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017054.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a summation given by Ms. Moe on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues to the jury that the defense's attempt to discredit a witness named Jane by calling other women named Michelle and Ava to testify is a meaningless distraction. She emphasizes that Jane never identified the specific individuals Michelle Healey or Eva Dubin, and points out that Epstein and Maxwell's contact book contained multiple people with those common first names.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017050.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor. She argues that testimony from a witness named Matt corroborates the account of a victim named Jane. Matt, who dated Jane in the mid-2000s, testified that Jane told him years ago about being abused by her "godfather," Jeffrey Epstein, and another woman, whom Jane later confirmed was Maxwell after her arrest.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017045.jpg

This document is a transcript of a court summation, likely from a prosecutor named Ms. Moe, detailing the sexual abuse of a 14-year-old victim named Jane by Maxwell and Epstein. The summary recounts Jane's testimony about various forms of abuse, including forced touching and group encounters, and highlights trips the trio took from Florida to Epstein's house in New York via commercial and private flights. The speaker argues to the jury that these actions were predatory and not normal.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017044.jpg

This document is a page from a legal summation, likely by a prosecutor named Ms. Moe, recounting the testimony of a victim named Jane. The text details how Ghislaine Maxwell groomed Jane by teaching her how to massage Jeffrey Epstein, which then escalated into sexual abuse perpetrated by both Maxwell and Epstein. The testimony highlights Maxwell's role in normalizing the abuse by acting casually while it was happening, causing the victim immense confusion and fear.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017037.jpg

This document is a page from a court summation, likely delivered by 'Ms. Moe', in a criminal case. The speaker outlines the stages of 'grooming' as explained by a Dr. Rocchio and alleges that the defendants, Maxwell and Epstein, used this exact 'playbook' to carefully select and target vulnerable girls from struggling, single-mother households, specifically naming Jane, Kate, Annie, and Carolyn.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017036.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of a prosecutor's summation in a trial against 'Maxwell'. The prosecutor argues that a warning in a household manual for staff to be 'blind, deaf, and dumb' was intended to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' she and Epstein were committing. The prosecutor also introduces the argument that Maxwell used a consistent 'playbook' to exploit multiple young girls, citing victims by name and referencing the testimony of an expert psychologist.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016983.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a court hearing on August 10, 2022, pertaining to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The discussion centers on amending a legal document, specifically a clause alleging that Maxwell, among Epstein's employees, sent gifts to Carolyn between 2001 and 2004. Mr. Everdell argues for the exclusion of Maxwell's name from this clause, citing a lack of evidence and contradictory FedEx records, to which the government, represented by Mr. Rohrbach, ultimately agrees.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016803.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Young, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness confirms their involvement in two interviews from December 2019 and February 2020 and is asked to read excerpts from a report. The quoted sections describe an incident where an individual named Maxwell removed the clothes of a 14-year-old girl referred to as 'Jane'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016802.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Young by Ms. Menninger. The questioning centers on a report from a November 2019 interview with a person named 'Jane', which was authored by the witness's partner, Detective Byrne. The testimony confirms that Jane was present at Epstein's house and was unsure if Maxwell had ever called her to make appointments.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016443.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Swain is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz. Swain testifies that a person named Annie took a weekend trip to New Mexico in the spring of 1996, that Epstein paid for the trip, and that Swain personally drove Annie to the airport. The witness denies ever having spoken to or met a person named Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016406.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Redirect examination of Annie Farmer) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness regarding a statement made to the FBI in 2006 concerning a massage given to her by Maxwell. The witness describes Maxwell asking her to undress and lay on a table under sheets, and then rubbing her body and pulling back the sheet, before the defense attorney objects.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013189.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between her current testimony and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding her visits to Epstein's residence. Specifically, she is questioned about whether it was Sarah or Maxwell who greeted her on her second visit and Sarah's role in scheduling massages.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013149.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn confirms she received wired money from a fund and, as a condition, signed a waiver agreeing not to sue any of Jeffrey Epstein's employees, which she understands includes a person named Maxwell. The transcript concludes with one attorney, Ms. Comey, finishing her questions and another, Mr. Pagliuca, beginning his cross-examination.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013147.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Carolyn confirms her prior testimony from December 2009, stating she called Mr. Epstein's residence to arrange a paid massage. She recalls speaking with individuals named Sarah and Maxwell, or other household staff, who took messages for Mr. Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013146.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The testimony reviews Carolyn's prior statements from December 2009 regarding her visits to Jeffrey Epstein's home. Specifically, Carolyn confirms that Epstein did not contact her personally; rather, he would have 'Sarah or Maxwell' call her to arrange the visits.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Total Received
$18,300,000.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$1,750,000.00
3 transactions
Net Flow
$16,550,000.00
5 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Paid MAXWELL Court/Government $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
N/A Paid MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2022-06-29 Paid MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. View
1999-10-19 Received Financial Trust C... MAXWELL $18,300,000.00 Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... View
1999-10-19 Received Financial Trust C... MAXWELL $0.00 Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
4
Total
58

Appointments

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.

Phone call
N/A

Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence

From: MAXWELL
To: ["staff"]

A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.

Household manual
N/A

Interaction with Epstein

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Juan Alessi"]

Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.

Verbal directive
N/A

Advice about boyfriends

From: MAXWELL
To: Jane

Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.

In-person conversation
N/A

Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)

From: MAXWELL
To: ["unspecified"]

The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.

Phone call
N/A

Reply brief

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Court"]

A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.

Legal filing
N/A

Massages

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Annie"]

Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.

In-person conversation
N/A

Taking over the house

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Juan Alessi"]

Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.

Verbal statement
N/A

Massage

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Minor Victim-2"]

MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.

Unsolicited message
N/A

Reply to Government's Opposition

From: MAXWELL
To: THE COURT

A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.

Legal brief
N/A

Massage

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Minor Victim-2"]

MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.

Unsolicited message
N/A

Civil Case Testimony

From: MAXWELL
To: litigants

Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).

Deposition
N/A

Epstein's whereabouts

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.

Conversation
N/A

Reconsideration of response to jury note

From: MAXWELL
To: the court/Judge Nathan

Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.

Letter
N/A

Scheduling massages

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.

Call
N/A

Spending time vs Communicating

From: Kate
To: MAXWELL

Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.

Meeting
N/A

Reconsideration of response

From: MAXWELL
To: U.S. District Court fo...

Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.

Letter
N/A

Scheduling sexualized massages

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.

Phone call
N/A

Scheduling appointments

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.

Phone call
N/A

Instruction to undress

From: MAXWELL
To: A. Farmer

She told me to get undressed.

Verbal instruction
N/A

Small talk during massage

From: MAXWELL
To: A. Farmer

making small talk

Conversation
N/A

Legal Review

From: attorneys
To: MAXWELL

Review of discovery materials

Video-teleconference
N/A

Request to question Juror 50

From: MAXWELL
To: U.S. District Court fo...

Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.

Letter
N/A

Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal

From: MAXWELL
To: THE COURT

A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.

Legal brief
N/A

Scheduling sexualized massages

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.

Phone call
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity