MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Grooming | Over a weekend, Maxwell engaged in 'textbook grooming behavior' with Annie, including chatting wi... | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell's appeal of a motion for pretrial release, focusing on her conditions of confinement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Nighttime checks | Regular flashlight checks conducted by the MDC on Maxwell, which she claims disturb her sleep and... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Trip | A. Farmer took a trip to New Mexico. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Shopping trip | Maxwell and Epstein purchased boots for A. Farmer during a shopping trip. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Employment | Juan Alessi worked as the house manager in Palm Beach. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Trip | Maxwell spent her weeks flying on Epstein's private jet to his various properties. | Upper East Side, New Mexico... | View |
| N/A | Shopping trip | Maxwell took Annie on a shopping trip where they bought her boots and a hair product. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Assault | At a movie theater, Epstein held Annie's hand and rubbed her foot and arm openly in Maxwell's pre... | Movie theater | View |
| N/A | Trip | Jane was enticed by Maxwell and Epstein to travel across state lines to New York to be abused. | New York | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Prosecution of Maxwell by the USAO-SDNY. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Transportation of Jane to New York for the purpose of illegal sexual activity. | New York | View |
| N/A | Trip | The witness's second visit to Epstein's residence, during which she states she was greeted by Max... | Epstein's residence | View |
| N/A | Massage | Maxwell gave Annie Farmer a massage when Annie was 16 years old. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The schedule for Maxwell's sentencing hearing has not yet been set. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | A flight to New Mexico and a subsequent return flight involving a person named Jane. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Trip | Epstein and MAXWELL encouraged Minor Victim-1 to travel to Epstein's residences. | New York and Florida | View |
| N/A | Meeting | MAXWELL interacted with Minor Victim-2 at Epstein's residence. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell filed a 'renewed motion' which the court finds substantively meritless. | This Court | View |
| N/A | Legal ruling | Judge Nathan found three times that the Government established Maxwell is a risk of flight and th... | district court | View |
| N/A | Trip | A trip to the movies after leaving the ranch. | A movie theater in a mall area | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury indictment process related to Maxwell's conduct. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal motion | Maxwell filed a renewed motion for temporary release. | this Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Grand jury proceedings related to the Epstein and Maxwell case, the transcripts of which are bein... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | MAXWELL began efforts to groom Minor Victim-2 for abuse by Epstein. | New Mexico | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017540.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Jane provides testimony under direct examination. She describes being led by a man (contextually Epstein) to a pool house where he sexually assaulted her by masturbating on her. Jane explains her reaction was to freeze in fear and that she did not tell anyone because she was terrified and ashamed, but confirms she continued spending time with Maxwell and Epstein in Palm Beach after the incident.
DOJ-OGR-00017536.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Jane. Jane testifies that an unnamed male (implied to be Epstein) provided financial support to her and her mother, paying for items like voice lessons and clothes. She also recounts a disturbing conversation with Maxwell, who advised her that once she had a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, they were 'grandfathered in,' implying she could always resume it.
DOJ-OGR-00014506.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, is delivering a summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger systematically attacks the credibility of a key witness by highlighting numerous instances where the witness claims she cannot remember crucial details of her alleged encounters with Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney argues that the witness's lack of memory regarding being touched, kissed, or seeing Maxwell present during sexual acts contradicts the government's case and makes her testimony unreliable.
DOJ-OGR-00011596.jpg
This document is a personal statement from a victim detailing over a decade of severe emotional and physical suffering, including a diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), following abuse. The speaker explains that the arrests of Epstein in 2019 and Maxwell in 2020 were pivotal, providing the validation needed to finally disclose the abuse to others and begin a path toward closure.
DOJ-OGR-00011595.jpg
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing the profound and lasting trauma inflicted by Epstein and Maxwell. The speaker describes being terrified and threatened with death, and how her attempts to escape by moving were futile as they always found her. This involvement led to a decade of severe mental and physical health issues, including over two dozen hospitalizations, and left her unable to hold a job or care for herself.
DOJ-OGR-00011589.jpg
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing horrific sexual abuse perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell over seven to eight months. The victim describes being manipulated and abused daily at Epstein's New York mansion and private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, culminating in an escape attempt. The testimony highlights the methods of control and psychological torment used by Epstein and Maxwell to ensnare their victims.
DOJ-OGR-00011588.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022. It captures a portion of a victim impact statement hearing, where the court acknowledges written submissions from Ms. Bryant, Ms. Maria Farmer, and Ms. Helm before hearing live testimony from Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome begins her testimony by describing the lasting trauma from a "hideous trap set by Epstein, Maxwell and other co-conspirators" and recounts how she was approached by an "Epstein-Maxwell recruiter" named Natalya after moving to New York at age 22.
DOJ-OGR-00011576.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing a statement, likely a closing argument or sentencing memo, regarding the defendant, Maxwell. The text details the defendant's predatory behavior, describing how she manipulated and trafficked young girls for sex to serve a middle-aged man.
DOJ-OGR-00011552.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, where attorneys debate whether Maxwell had a supervisory or leadership role over Sarah Kellen. One attorney argues against this, citing testimony from Larry Visoski and Cimberly Espinosa that Kellen was Epstein's assistant, not Maxwell's. In response, another attorney, Ms. Moe, references testimony from a witness named Carolyn who recalled Kellen scheduling massages while Maxwell was present at the Palm Beach residence, implying a connection.
DOJ-OGR-00011550.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing arguments in a criminal case. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, asserts that the defendant held a leadership role over Sarah Kellen, citing flight records showing they both traveled on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet during the same period. The defense, represented by Mr. Everdell, begins to challenge the prosecution's legal interpretation regarding the need to prove supervision of another criminal participant.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019297.jpg
A legal letter dated February 7, 2018, from the law firm Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, representing intervenor Alan Dershowitz in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case. The letter is addressed to attorneys J. Stanley Pottinger, Paul G. Cassell, Sigrid S. McCawley, and Laura A. Menninger. The correspondence begins an allegation that the plaintiff's counsel improperly leaked submissions from a pending disciplinary proceeding to the Washington Post.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017821.jpg
This document is a court filing (Page 4 of 6) from April 16, 2019, discussing various allegations related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details claims by 'Ransome' about being recruited as a masseuse, held against her will, and forced into sex by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, leading to a civil lawsuit. The document also describes Epstein's plea deal, which quashed an FBI investigation, and includes a photograph of Virginia Roberts with Prince Andrew, with Ghislaine Maxwell in the background, where Roberts claims she was a sex slave and had sex with the prince.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027556.jpg
This document is a digital communication log from December 6, 2018, marked as House Oversight evidence. It details a conversation between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The discussion involves confirmation that 'Chomsky' is 'all in,' followed by an inquiry regarding 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine), with the redacted sender noting she has a 'jealous' boyfriend, to which the jeeitunes account responds dismissively ('So what').
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022994.jpg
This document is a printed email chain from May 2016 ending with Darren Indyke forwarding a message to Jeffrey Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com). The subject line references 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The body of Indyke's email is redacted as privileged. The forwarded message is from Miles Alexander (Operations Manager) stating 'Answer to questions asked' and 'No response received'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015539.jpg
This page is from a legal complaint (Case 1:15-cv-07433) filed on September 21, 2015. It outlines allegations of libel against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating she and her agent Gow made false statements with 'actual and deliberate malice' to discredit the plaintiff, Giuffre. The document asserts that these statements damaged Giuffre's professional reputation as the president of a sex trafficking non-profit and falsely accused her of lying about being recruited by Maxwell and abused by Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015257.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a narrative work or report (marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp) discussing conspiracy mentality. It features a quote from 'Maxwell' recounting a salacious anecdote about the Queen Mother having a secret boyfriend who allegedly broke into Buckingham Palace. The text then pivots to a quote from conspiracy theorist David Icke regarding the British Royal Family and allegations of shapeshifting rituals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029885.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP) and Jacquie Johnson. The conversation concerns the 'Jane Doe' case and specifically inquires about the status of serving a subpoena to 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell). The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021908.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview. The speaker discusses suspicions regarding flight logs provided by Bruce Rinehart, a former AUSA who went to work near and allegedly for Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker notes that the logs showed approximately ten flights involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Epstein, and suggests the term 'one female' in the logs may have been a code word for an underage girl.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Instruction to touch Epstein
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
Maxwell Reply
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Reconsideration of the District Court's response
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Travel and an invitation to an island
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
General life updates and invitations
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Carolyn's career aspirations
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Scheduling massage appointments
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Epstein's sexual preferences and needs
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity