Laura Menninger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict for Laura Menninger | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-27 | N/A | Laura Menninger sends supplemental letter regarding anticipated testimony of Mr. [Redacted] to US... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Hard drive with discovery materials sent via FedEx to Laura Menninger's office in Colorado. | Colorado | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00010016.pdf
An email dated November 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of an ECF filing ('Reply_to_Dkt_423.pdf') related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330) and to update recipients on Sternheim's new office address, which is redacted in the document.
EFTA00009985.pdf
An email dated November 9, 2021, from defense attorney Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) providing a Rule 16 Disclosure. The email includes attachments referencing AT&T certifications, FedEx records/invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
EFTA00009981.pdf
An email chain from November 2021 concerning the *US v. Maxwell* trial. Defense attorney Laura Menninger flagged missing witness materials (designated 3521-003). USANYS staff identified an indexing error where files were mislabeled during production. The prosecution team corrected the stamps on the documents and arranged to deliver a thumb drive with the supplemental 3500 material (witness statements) to the judge's chambers.
EFTA00009980.pdf
An email dated November 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (referenced as 'fling') related to an attachment titled 'Suggestion_to_Dkt_404.pdf' and provides notice of Sternheim's new office address. Recipients include co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00009895.pdf
An email dated April 20, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves filing notice for a letter regarding redactions to the defense's reply briefs in the case US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00018362.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a stipulation agreed upon by the prosecution and defense regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson to avoid recalling him to the stand. Defense attorney Christian Everdell reads the stipulation into the record, which concerns a cardboard box (Government Exhibit 294) recovered during a search.
DOJ-OGR-00014878.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. Counsel for the government and for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, state their appearances for the record. The judge outlines the case schedule, noting that jury selection began on November 4th and the trial is set to commence on November 29th, and sets the agenda to address the defendant's motions to exclude evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008246.jpg
This document is a transcript from a pretrial conference held on December 8, 2021, for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the session, with legal teams for both the government (led by Maurene Comey) and the defense (led by Bobbi C. Sternheim) introducing themselves. The primary purpose of the conference is to discuss the logistics of jury selection (voir dire) and review lists of prospective jurors based on questionnaires administered in November.
DOJ-OGR-00001875.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal letter dated December 7, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. The letter requests the immediate elimination of 'onerous' and 'restrictive' detention conditions for her client, Ms. Maxwell. Copies of the letter were sent via email to four other attorneys involved in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001006.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, for a hearing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Nathan. The transcript records the appearances of the legal counsel for both the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the U.S. government. The government's counsel also requests permission for staff from the U.S. Attorney's office to be dialed into the hearing due to technical issues with an overflow line from Connecticut.
DOJ-OGR-00020930.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) filed on March 9, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The juror confirms they have no personal or familial relationships with the defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The document contains handwritten 'X' marks indicating negative responses to questions regarding potential conflicts of interest.
DOJ-OGR-00020881.jpg
This document is a news article from DailyMail.Online detailing an interview with 'Scotty,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty discusses the jury's deliberations, their negative reaction to the defense's aggressive tactics towards victims, and the overwhelming complexity of the 80-page jury instructions. A sidebar article reports on a separate legal issue, describing a 'brutal' court hearing for Prince Andrew in New York for a sexual abuse lawsuit, where a judge appeared unreceptive to his lawyers' arguments to dismiss the case.
DOJ-OGR-00020708.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log detailing proceedings in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 27, 2021, and January 5, 2022. It records the conclusion of the jury trial, the guilty verdict on multiple counts, and subsequent orders regarding post-trial motions and scheduling. Additionally, it notes correspondence regarding juror issues and a request for a vaccine booster for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00020707.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 19, 2021, to December 22, 2021. It details various motions, orders regarding public access to trial exhibits and closing arguments, and minute entries for the jury trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020706.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 17 and 19, 2021. It details daily minute entries for the jury trial, orders regarding jury charges and verdict sheets, and various letters filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning jury instructions, testimony preclusion (specifically regarding Alexander Hamilton), and closing logistics. The document highlights specific judicial edits to legal definitions, such as defining a 'minor' as an individual under the age of 18.
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020704.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings between December 11 and December 15, 2021. It details various filings including letters regarding witness orders, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as a significant Memorandum Opinion denying a defense motion to allow witnesses to testify anonymously. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense, along with Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings during this trial period.
DOJ-OGR-00020703.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from December 9 and 10, 2021. It details legal arguments over the admission of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), involving witness Juan Alessi, where Judge Nathan overruled defense objections. It also records minute entries for the jury trial proceedings on those dates and the filing of transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00020702.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 6 to December 8, 2021. It details minute entries for the jury trial proceedings, identifying the attorneys present for both the defense (Sternheim, Pagliuca, Everdell, Menninger) and the prosecution (Pomerantz, Comey, Moe, Rohrbach). The document also includes an order regarding the reimbursement of transportation costs for Juror Number 70 and notes the filing of a transcript for a conference held on November 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020701.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 2, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding witness anonymity and juror transportation, and various correspondence regarding witnesses 'Jane', 'Michael Dawson', and 'Witness-3'. The document tracks the legal motions and daily trial activities involving the prosecution team, defense team, and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020700.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the SDNY regarding US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events on November 29 and 30, 2021. It details the beginning of the jury trial, orders regarding the production of materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, and the handling of witness privacy and pseudonyms. It lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020692.jpg
This document is a court docket report (SDNY) covering November 15-17, 2021, detailing pretrial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the filing of transcripts for prior conferences, a memo endorsement ordering the government to use FedEx for disclosures due to mail delays at the MDC, and minute entries for a pretrial conference, voir dire, and the beginning of jury selection. The document lists the full legal teams for both the defense and the prosecution present during these proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020687.jpg
This document is a court docket entry from February 28, 2023, for Case 22-1426, primarily concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It details court orders and filings from November 2021, including COVID-19 protocols for courthouse access, scheduling revisions for motions in limine, and a pretrial conference. The entries highlight communications between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys) regarding trial logistics and a ruling on witness testimony, all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020682.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 1-3, 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present and remanded, as well as various filings including motions for reconsideration regarding bond and juror disclosure. The Judge also issued orders regarding voir dire instructions and scheduled a hearing for November 10, 2021, to discuss evidentiary rules (Rule 412 and 702/Daubert).
DOJ-OGR-00020677.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the SDNY regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell appeared via telephone and sets forth a comprehensive order regarding jury selection protocols, including the use of questionnaires, anonymized juror numbers, and schedules for voir dire in November 2021. The Judge explicitly denied a request to seal the proposed jury questionnaires, citing the First Amendment right to public access despite the case's significant media attention.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx view on April 12; raising issues about specific items (boxes, framed photo) that need to be moved to 500 Pearl; questioning 'missing items' and electronic surveillance formats.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussing logistics for Bronx view. Raising issues about 'Highly Confidential' vs 'bulky' items, specific Florida evidence items, and electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Discussing logistics for Bronx warehouse view and 500 Pearl view. Raising issues about 'highly confidential' vs 'bulky' items, photography rights, and electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Raising issues about spreadsheets: items marked for Bronx that need to be at 500 Pearl (highly confidential but not bulky); questions about photographing bulky photos; questions about electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Addressing logistics: FBI inspections at Bronx warehouse, designation of 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photos, witness statements, use of proffer rooms at 500 Pearl, and bringing 2,100 electronic images to 500 Pearl.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx warehouse visit; 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photo rules; witness statements.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to government proposal; demanding access to photograph items at Bronx warehouse; refusing massage tables.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications regarding photography of items at Bronx warehouse and protocols for electronic media.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications. Requesting access to inspect 'excluded' items at Bronx warehouse. Discussing equipment for playing media and space requirements.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to defense requests; refusing to transport all physical evidence; discussing 'bulky' items like massage tables and plaster busts.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Response regarding logistics for physical evidence review. Refusing to move massage tables/bulky items to Pearl St. Explaining image categories.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, cash, and bulky items (plaster busts, stuffed dog) to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for tapes.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response to defense requests. Refusing to move massage tables, electronic devices that can't be turned on, and bulky items like plaster busts/stuffed dog to 500 Pearl. Agreeing to move 15-20 boxes of physical evidence.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to defense requests; refusing to move all physical evidence to 500 Pearl; agreeing to exclude massage tables and cash from transport; discussing 2,100 highly confidential images.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, framed pictures, and plaster busts to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for recordings.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating the proposal is inadequate for defense. demanding laptops be allowed, all physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl (except massage tables), and questioning why 2,100 'highly confidential' images were not shared earlier.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Complaint that current proposal prevents meaningful defense; requesting all physical evidence be moved to 500 Pearl.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Detailed response regarding deficiencies in prosecution's proposal for evidence review. Requests transport of evidence to 500 Pearl St, permission for laptops, and segregation of 'highly confidential' items.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Stating the Gov proposal is inadequate. Demanding laptops/devices be allowed, and questioning why 2,100 highly confidential images were not previously shared.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Rejecting proposal as inadequate; insisting on laptops/devices during review; demanding physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl; questioning missing highly confidential images.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating previous proposal was inadequate; demanding physical evidence be moved to 500 Pearl; requesting laptops/devices be allowed; asking about 2,100+7 highly confidential images not previously shared.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Detailed explanation of 'Highly Confidential' nude images (2,100 from devices, 3,400 from discs, 7 hard copies). Explaining constraints on reviewing obscene material. Detailing rules for Bronx warehouse review.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Providing spreadsheets of physical evidence. Detailing 2,100 electronic images seized from Epstein's devices (highly confidential/nude), 3,400 images from discs, and 7 hard copy nude images.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity