SARAH KELLEN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co defendants |
49
Very Strong
|
45 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
22
Very Strong
|
31 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Client |
20
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Bruce E. Reinhart
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Superior subordinate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Supervisory |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SHOPPERS TRAVEL, INC.
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SHOPPERS TRAVEL, INC.
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brian Vickers
|
Spouse |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-09-17 | N/A | Summons entered on FLSD Docket | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-09-17 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for lawsuit M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-06-30 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-29 | N/A | Signing of Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2010-06-27 | N/A | Resolution of claims reached in this and State court companion case (referenced as 'this week' re... | Florida | View |
| 2010-03-24 | N/A | Deposition of Sarah Kellen | Unknown | View |
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Filing of Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-09-18 | N/A | Unsealing of the nine-page federal non-prosecution agreement. | Federal Court | View |
| 2009-08-01 | N/A | Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants Sarah Kellen's motion to adopt Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss ... | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2009-06-23 | N/A | Defendant Kellen served a Motion to Set Aside Default. | Florida (Legal Filing) | View |
| 2009-06-23 | N/A | Sarah Kellen moved to set aside the default. | Court | View |
| 2009-06-17 | N/A | Court granted Plaintiff's motion and entered a default against Kellen. | Court | View |
| 2009-06-16 | N/A | Order of Default signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra. | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2009-06-12 | N/A | Sarah Kellen visited Jeffrey Epstein at Palm Beach County Jail | Palm Beach County Jail | View |
| 2009-06-12 | N/A | Service of process effected on Sarah Kellen by Joseph Sanchez | New York State (implied by ... | View |
| 2009-06-12 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Motion for Default against Defendant Sarah Kellen (DE 37). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-04-23 | N/A | Date Sarah Kellen was served with the summons according to the Plaintiff. | New York | View |
| 2009-04-01 | N/A | Sarah Kellen rents a bungalow in Palm Beach under the alias 'Clara'. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2009-04-01 | N/A | Sarah Kellen, using the alias 'Clara', rents a property in Palm Beach. | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2009-03-24 | N/A | Summons issued for Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-03-24 | N/A | Plaintiff Jane Doe II filed a Complaint against Defendants Epstein and Kellen. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Carolyn against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. | Unknown | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Plaintiff filed the case (Jane Doe II v. Epstein & Kellen). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Civil Lawsuit | Unknown (Court) | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Sarah Kellen goes on a round-the-world trip for at least a month. | International | View |
039.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated June 16, 2009, granting a default judgment against Sarah Kellen in a civil case filed by Jane Doe II. Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that Kellen failed to respond to the complaint despite being properly served under New York state law. Jeffrey Epstein is listed as a co-defendant in the case header.
037.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Motion for Default filed on June 12, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida against Sarah Kellen in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The motion asserts that Kellen has been avoiding service but was successfully served according to New York law and failed to respond. Notably, it alleges that Kellen is aware of the legal action and has visited Jeffrey Epstein at the Palm Beach County Jail on several occasions.
037-01.pdf
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Southern District of Florida for the case Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein. It details multiple attempts by process server Joseph Sanchez in April 2009 to serve Sarah Kellen (a/k/a Sarah Bonk) at her New York apartment. After several failed attempts where the doorman stated she was out of town or not home, service was eventually effected on April 25, 2009, by leaving the papers with the doorman, identified as Hector 'Doe', followed by a mailed copy.
032.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed on June 4, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs are requesting a court order prohibiting Jeffrey Epstein and his agents from contacting them directly or indirectly, citing his status as a convicted sex offender and their fear of intimidation. The document also includes a service list detailing the legal representation for various parties, including Bruce E. Reinhart representing co-defendant Sarah Kellen.
027.pdf
This document is a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal submitted on May 29, 2009, by attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs request permission to file their response to Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal, or alternatively, request the court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) so they can adequately respond. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing attorneys representing Epstein, co-defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and various other Jane Doe plaintiffs.
025.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed on May 29, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida, arguing for the right to proceed anonymously in their lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs contend that Epstein aims to reveal their identities to harass and intimidate them, and they cite various legal precedents and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to support their request for privacy due to the sexual nature of the crimes committed against them as minors. The document also includes a service list detailing the attorneys representing various parties in related cases against Epstein.
020.pdf
This document is the Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss in a civil case. The Plaintiff argues that the federal court has jurisdiction alongside state claims, that the 2006 amendments to 18 U.S.C. §2255 regarding damages should apply retroactively or are procedural, and that interstate commerce requirements were met via phone calls made by co-defendant Sarah Kellen from a New York number. The document details specific dates of solicitation between 2003 and 2005 and alleges a conspiracy involving Epstein, Kellen, and Haley Robson to procure minors for prostitution.
016.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on May 15, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, case number 09-80469-CIV-MARRA. Plaintiff Jane Doe II requests an extension until May 22, 2009, to file a reply to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, citing complex issues and other business. Epstein's counsel, Robert Critton, was consulted and did not oppose the extension.
015-01.pdf
This document is a Motion to Stay proceedings filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in a civil case brought by a plaintiff identified as C.M.A. Epstein argues that the civil case should be paused until late 2010, when his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with federal prosecutors expires, to avoid forcing him to waive his 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination while facing potential ongoing criminal liability. The filing includes an affidavit from his criminal defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Indictment from 2006 for Felony Solicitation of Prostitution.
013.pdf
This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 6, 2009, against Plaintiff Jane Doe II. The defense argues that the federal case should be dismissed because a nearly identical state case was filed 10 months prior, and because the plaintiff is improperly applying a 2006 amendment to 18 U.S.C. §2255 retroactively to conduct alleged to have occurred between 2003 and 2005, thereby violating the Ex Post Facto clause. Additionally, the motion argues that the statute does not allow for multiplying damages per incident and that the plaintiff failed to allege the necessary interstate commerce elements required for federal jurisdiction.
004.pdf
This document is an Order of Transfer from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated March 2009. Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp transfers the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen (Case No. 09-80469) to Judge Kenneth A. Marra. The transfer is ordered because the case is related to several lower-numbered cases already assigned to Judge Marra (including 08-80069, 08-80119, etc.).
003.pdf
This document is an 'Order of Pretrial Procedures' from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, dated March 25, 2009, in the civil case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. It outlines the procedural requirements for the case, including deadlines for scheduling meetings, reports, and discovery planning, and warns of sanctions for non-compliance. The document also includes a sample 'Scheduling Order' template detailing rules for pretrial stipulations, jury instructions, and witness lists.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Summons from the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, dated March 24, 2009. It notifies defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen (a.k.a. Sarah Bonk) that they are being sued by Jane Doe II and must respond within 20 days. Notably, the summons lists Sarah Kellen's address in New York City and Jeffrey Epstein's address as the Palm Beach County Stockade, including his inmate jacket number.
026.pdf
This document is an October 2008 court order granting a motion to remand the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen' back to state court. The federal judge ruled that the plaintiff had valid state-law claims (civil conspiracy, etc.) against defendant Haley Robson, a Florida resident, meaning her inclusion in the lawsuit was not 'fraudulent joinder' intended solely to defeat federal diversity jurisdiction. The order details the plaintiff's allegations that Robson recruited her at age 14 from Loxahatchee, Kellen managed the encounter, and Epstein sexually abused her at his Palm Beach mansion.
024.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on September 18, 2008, by Plaintiff Jane Doe in the Southern District of Florida (Case 08-80804) against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The plaintiff requests an extension of time to respond to Epstein's Motion to Dismiss until 15 days after the court rules on a pending motion to remand the case to state court due to alleged lack of federal jurisdiction. The document lists legal counsel for all parties, including Bruce Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
024-01.pdf
A Proposed Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The document grants the Plaintiff's unopposed motion to extend the deadline for responding to Epstein's Motion to Dismiss until 15 days after a pending motion to remand is decided. The document was entered on the docket on September 18, 2008.
021.pdf
This document is an 'Opposition to Remand Motion' filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in September 2008 in the Southern District of Florida. The defendants argue that the case should remain in federal court because the plaintiff fraudulently joined co-defendant Haley Robson (a Florida resident) solely to destroy diversity jurisdiction. The filing contends that the plaintiff has no valid cause of action against Robson for civil conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), or civil RICO under Florida law, arguing that Robson's alleged actions do not meet the legal standards for these torts.
019.pdf
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves to dismiss Counts I (sexual assault), II (civil conspiracy), and IV (civil RICO) of Jane Doe's amended complaint. The motion argues that the sexual assault claim improperly relies on a criminal statute with no private right of action, the conspiracy claim lacks an actionable underlying tort, and the RICO claim fails to allege a direct injury resulting from a predicate act. The document outlines relevant Florida case law and statutes to support the dismissal of these claims.
018.pdf
This document is a Motion for Stay filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in a civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe. They argue that a stay is mandatory under federal law because of a pending federal criminal investigation/action (the deferred prosecution agreement). Attached is a declaration from AUSA A. Marie Villafana detailing the government's interaction with victims (T.M., C.W., S.R.) and providing copies of notification letters sent to them and their attorneys regarding their rights and the non-prosecution agreement.
017.pdf
This document is a Motion to File Under Seal submitted by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen on July 25, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe v. Epstein et al. The defendants request to seal their 'motion for stay' to protect a confidential agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The document includes certificates of compliance and service, noting that the plaintiff opposes the motion, and lists the legal counsel representing all parties involved.
016-01.pdf
This document contains a Proposed Order and an Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen (Case No. 08-80804). Filed on August 13, 2008, the motion requests an extension to file a Civil RICO Case Statement until after the court rules on an upcoming motion to remand the case back to state court. The plaintiff argues the case was improperly removed to federal court and lacks federal jurisdiction. The document includes a service list identifying legal counsel for all parties, including Bruce Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
014.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 22, 2008, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Epstein's lawyers state they have no opposition to the plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence (DE 12). However, they dispute the plaintiff's certification of compliance, arguing that plaintiff's counsel filed the motion prematurely without properly conferring with the defense or waiting for a return call regarding Epstein's position.
013.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of Florida dated August 21, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders defendant Jeffrey Epstein to respond to the Plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence and Expedite Certain Discovery by August 26, 2008.
012.pdf
This document is a motion filed on August 21, 2008, by Plaintiff Jane Doe in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The plaintiff requests the court to preserve evidence seized by the Palm Beach Police Department from Epstein's home, citing concerns that Epstein (who had recently pleaded guilty and was in jail) was attempting to retrieve the evidence through State Court and might destroy it. The document includes a service list identifying legal counsel for all parties, including Bruce E. Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
011.pdf
This document is a Motion to Remand filed on August 18, 2008, by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The plaintiff seeks to move the case back to Florida state court, arguing that federal diversity jurisdiction is invalid because both the Plaintiff and Defendant Haley Robson are Florida citizens. The motion details allegations that Robson recruited the plaintiff (a minor at the time) for Epstein's sexual abuse scheme and argues that Robson is a legitimate defendant, not 'fraudulently joined' solely to prevent federal jurisdiction.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $0.00 | Paid Plaintiff for 'sessions' with JEFFREY EPSTEIN | View |
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $0.00 | Paid Plaintiff for posing for photographs | View |
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $15,000.00 | Demanded judgment for damages in excess of fift... | View |
Phone call
Outgoing call, 12:46 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 11:29 AM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 1:46 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 1:48 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 1:47 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 7:22 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 12:10 AM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 2:01 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 10:29 AM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 11:45 AM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 1:54 PM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:45 PM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:57 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:59 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:59 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 10:00 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 10:03 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 10:05 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 10:20 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 10:44 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 1:10 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 4:10 PM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 4:10 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 4:15 PM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 5:17 PM.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity