| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Katherine W. Ezell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Senior Forensic Examiner
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Opposing counsel victim representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Technical Support Staff (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
US
|
Professional support |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Berman
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unit Chief
|
Professional cooperative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MDC staff
|
Professional coordination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Police Chief
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Professional adversarial defense victim counsel vs prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OIA
|
Professional regulatory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI agents
|
Professional law enforcement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Isidro Garcia
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI / Forensic Contractor
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Tech Support / Forensics
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Technical/Discovery team
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Gary Bloxsome
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bob Josefsberg
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | N/A | Correspondence regarding the processing status of Epstein search warrant materials. | N/A | View |
| 2019-11-03 | N/A | Travel to West Palm Beach for an interview on November 4. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2019-10-15 | N/A | FBI-arranged meeting with victims in the Epstein case | Florida | View |
| 2019-09-30 | N/A | Email inquiry regarding evidence processing | N/A | View |
| 2019-09-26 | N/A | Proposed meeting to discuss legal briefing schedule. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-09 | N/A | Scheduled conference call between Anjan Sahni and SDNY attorneys regarding subpoenas. | Phone | View |
| 2019-09-04 | N/A | Proposed Proffer Meeting (Likely delayed/affected by Hurricane Dorian). | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2019-09-01 | N/A | Next status conference | Unspecified (likely court) | View |
| 2019-08-22 | N/A | Government Meeting | Unknown (internal) | View |
| 2019-08-19 | N/A | Government files motion for order of nolle prosequi in U.S. v. Epstein | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-07 | N/A | Scheduled call regarding Epstein investigation | Phone Call | View |
| 2019-08-06 | N/A | Draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests prepared | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-06 | N/A | SDNY prosecutor flags details from Epstein's historical state plea transcript regarding the non-p... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-06 | N/A | Internal government correspondence regarding response to Epstein defense team's preservation requ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-06 | N/A | Drafting of response to Epstein defense preservation requests | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Email sent regarding subpoena for Epstein flight records | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-23 | N/A | Assistant U.S. Attorney spoke with a witness's lawyer to arrange contact. | New York (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Phone conversation between SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney and counsel for subpoena recipient. | Phone | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Phone conversation between SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney and defense counsel regarding representat... | Phone | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Phone conversation between AUSA and Defense Counsel. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Government filed reply in support of detention memo and opposition to bail. | SDNY / Court | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Filing of Government's reply in support of detention memo and opposition to bail. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Government filed reply in support of detention memo and opposition to defendant's motion for bail. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Meeting between SDNY, Mr. Kaiser, and his client regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, Manha... | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Judge Berman denied the government's request for extra time to review Epstein's financial disclos... | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government failed to acknowledge that a redacted individual had voluntarily approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It references court appearances in March and April 2019 and alleges the Assistant U.S. Attorney omitted mention of prior contacts between the redacted individual and the government.
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge it had approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It cites legal appearances in March and April 2019 and references testimony from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (in Exhibits D and E) who allegedly omitted mentioning these prior contacts.
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge that prosecutors had been approached multiple times by another party prior to a grand jury subpoena being issued. The document alleges that the government and an Assistant U.S. Attorney continued to omit mention of these prior contacts during court appearances in March and April 2019.
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, detailing complaints about the conduct of federal prosecutors in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text alleges that prosecutors made unprecedented financial demands, including a requirement for Epstein to pay $150,000 to alleged victims (most of whom were later found to be adults, not minors) and to fund a specific civil attorney chosen by the prosecution. It further alleges a conflict of interest where an Assistant U.S. Attorney recommended a civil lawyer connected to their boyfriend, and notes that First Assistant Sloman's former law partner, Mr. Herman, began filing civil suits against Epstein.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-28 | Paid | Assistant U.S. At... | Airline (implied) | $100.00 | Cancellation fee for personal flight caused by ... | View |
Discussing availability for dates in late September or October 2021.
Detailed summary of a phone call received from a woman claiming to be an Epstein victim and context regarding her former attorney.
Victim identifying herself and providing contact info. Call lasted less than 3 minutes.
Discussing slips in FOIA scans and CDs not being scanned.
Reporting technical issues with 48 audio files (codec problem) and providing a table of media files downloaded.
Following up on previous inquiry.
Inquiry regarding how the FBI approached CDs found in boxes of materials from Florida.
Sent next round of discovery via FedEx. Password sent separately.
Asking which carrier was used (FedEx/USPS) to locate the package.
Confirmed sent via FedEx, delivered Friday 8/07/2020 at 7:16 am.
Inquiring about which carrier (FedEx/USPS) was used to send the hard drive as it hasn't been received/located yet.
Inquiry about protocol for delivering discovery hard drive to Ghislaine Maxwell. Asking if encryption is allowed.
Instructions: mail to legal department, drive will be etched with number, authorization memo needed. Password protection allowed if password provided in cover letter.
Confirming they will mail the drive tomorrow and thanking for the help.
Explaining protocol: Hard drives must be mailed to Legal Dept, etched with a number, provided with authorization memo. Can be password protected if password is provided in cover letter.
Asking for protocol to deliver hard drive with discovery to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC. Asking about encryption rules.
Caller spoke with Scarola and the female subject; confirmed she is willing to meet.
Confirming need for a list of locations in the house where each item was recovered.
Requesting serial numbers to differentiate duplicate devices (Dell PowerEdge, Sony Vaio, etc.) and asking for location data within the house.
Complaining about data format issues, specifically that emails cannot be linked to attachments (citing 'flight records' as an example) and load files don't match native files.
Complaint about disorganized data delivery. Notes a folder 'NYC024362' has 600,000 items alone. Requests a spreadsheet tracking every device and its dump status.
Expressing confusion over the contents of a delivered hard drive, noting duplicate files and lack of clear labeling.
Initial complaint about confusing data dumps, specifically folder NYC024362 with 600,000 items.
Sending flight options for Pensacola trip.
Requesting sample itineraries as meeting is not fully confirmed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity