| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Acosta
|
Investigative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Professional Responsibility Officer
|
Professional reporting |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Investigative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lanna Behlolovick
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ben Sasse
|
Oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Investigative subject investigator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Department prosecutors
|
Oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Oversight investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Five subject attorneys
|
Investigative subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Filip
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
subject attorneys
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional subject of review |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alice Fisher
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ben Sasse
|
Oversight requester |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Investigative subject investigator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Investigator subject |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey H. Sloman
|
Investigator subject |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Matthew I. Menchel
|
Investigator subject |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | CEOS providing OPR with Outlook data and conducting a check of its shared hard drive for document... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Office of the Deputy Attorney General providing OPR with Outlook data for three individuals, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR's investigation into the conduct of Department attorneys occurred approximately 12 years afte... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Acosta provided explanations to OPR regarding his office's handling of the Epstein prosecution, c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR conducted an extensive investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, reviewing documen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR conducted an investigation into the government's conduct in the Epstein case, reviewing hundr... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigated Acosta's decision and concluded that... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal investigation | The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigated whether U.S. Attorney Acosta's handl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal conclusion | OPR concluded that Acosta did not commit professional misconduct and had the authority to approve... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An investigation by the OPR (Office of Professional Responsibility) was conducted, the record of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR evaluation of Villafaña's conduct regarding FRPC violations. | Department of Justice (impl... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta's OPR Interview | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Interviews with prosecutors involved in the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta told OPR he was 'increasingly frustrated' by Epstein's desire for an '11th hour appeal'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Investigation Conclusion | DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | Retired FBI agent interviewed by OPR regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR questioned Acosta and administrative staff about the email gap. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR's review of Acosta's decision and the NPA, including examination of Departmental policies on ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR's conclusion that Acosta did not commit professional misconduct in developing, negotiating, o... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR investigation into Epstein's status as a cooperating witness or intelligence asset. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government initiated a massive OPR investigation into the execution of the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR concluded that attorneys negotiating the NPA did many things contrary to internal government ... | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Submission of OPR's final report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter to USANYS. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Transmission of OPR's final Report in the Jeffrey Epstein matter | N/A | View |
Comments submitted by the five former USAO attorneys on OPR's draft report.
Detailed responses submitted by the five former USAO attorneys.
Information received by OPR from victims and their attorneys regarding their interactions with legal authorities.
More than 60 interviews conducted with FBI case agents, their supervisors, FBI administrative personnel, current and former USAO staff/attorneys, current and former Department attorneys/senior managers, and former State Attorney/Assistant State Attorney.
Emails, letters, memoranda, investigative materials, sealed pleadings, grand jury transcripts, grand jury audio recordings, court records, media reports, interviews, articles, podcasts, and books.
Request for OPR to investigate allegations that USAO prosecutors improperly resolved the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.
Edwards did not respond to OPR's request to interview him.
Villafaña told OPR she did not inform Edwards.
Villafaña stated she 'listened more than [she] spoke' during interactions with Edwards, which occurred before the state court plea.
Villafaña's response 'Everybody' when asked about the email exchange during her OPR interview.
Villafaña stated, "I requested permission to make oral notifications to the victims regarding the upcoming change of plea, but the Office decided that victim notification could only come from a state investigator, and Jeff Sloman asked PBPD Chief Reiter to assist."
Belohlavek stated federal victims not part of the state case couldn't simply appear; coordination and investigation would be required.
Villafaña noted 'very little' communication and discussed a factual proffer, but did not recall discussing specific victims in the state case.
Acosta believed the state would notify victims and was unsure about overlap or list sharing with USAO.
Sloman stated his expectation for the plea, denied directing Villafaña, and addressed the 'public perception' of hiding results, explaining the notification and restitution mechanisms.
Villafaña, as Project Safe Childhood Coordinator, treated guidelines as a floor and aimed for a higher standard of contact.
Specialist told OPR that USAO did not file a charging document in Epstein matter, did not get VNS info from FBI, and did not assume responsibility for victim contact.
Acosta stated he's unaware of victim notifications rising to management level.
Villafaña told OPR USAO had no standardized victim notification method, she crafted a letter herself, did not intend for letters to activate CVRA obligations, and believed victims wouldn't be confused by multiple letters due to agent introduction.
it was "unusual to have a U.S. Attorney get involved with this level of detail."
Lourie told OPR his general recollection of concerns about the viability of federal prosecution of Epstein.
Menchel told OPR his belief that Epstein would have gone to trial if charges were filed and the USAO's weighing of risks.
Sloman told OPR about witness challenges and concerns regarding legal theories, including unreliable and impeachable witnesses, and vulnerable victims.
Acosta told OPR about discussions with senior managers regarding victim credibility, reluctance to testify, and evidentiary strength, and his belief that a trial would pose challenges.
FBI co-case agent recalled victims' safety concerns and reluctance to testify during OPR interview.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity