MR. EPSTEIN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
30
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employee |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employment |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Employee |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Gift giver receiver |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about her relationship with Mr. Epstein being separate from her oth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about whether Mr. Epstein had a relationship with Reid Hoffman. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about observing Reid Hoffman flying with her or Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell introducing a masseuse (DOJ REDACTION) to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's efforts to find masseuses for Jeffrey Epstein, including visiting legitimate ... | Massage spas, Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein charged federally in New York. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social parties hosted by Mr. Epstein where young women, characterized as masseuses, were guests o... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell attending weddings of famous people with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's activities and Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement, particularly r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein potentially helping Maxwell help the Clintons in the context of the Clin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for Mr. Epstein's plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period when Ghislaine Maxwell was 'general manager' for Epstein, and questions arise about lists ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawyer for Ms. Maxwell mentioned Mr. Dershowitz was among people Epstein directed to have sex with. | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Brief encounter between Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz at Epstein's New York mansion. | Mr. Epstein's mansion in Ne... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz frequently seen with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein allowed Mr. Dershowitz to use his bedroom. | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz visited Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home 4-5 times a year, staying 2-3 days. | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz received a massage at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house, stated the masseuse was not ... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] went to Miami for the weekend, returned and told Mr. Epstein she met a man who, w... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... | Mr. Epstein's mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Mr. Epstein's wealth, business, and assets (planes, island, New Mexico ranch). | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000483.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the pretrial detention of Mr. Epstein. The prosecution contends that a July 2019 search of his New York City mansion uncovered a 'vast trove' of sexually suggestive photographs of young women and girls, which they describe as 'photographic trophies.' This evidence, combined with his 2008 Florida sex crime convictions, is presented to demonstrate that he poses an 'ongoing and forward-looking danger' to the community and should not be released pending trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000474.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 18, 2019, outlines the arguments concerning the pretrial release of the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The Government contends he is an extraordinary flight risk due to his wealth, access to private planes, and the lengthy potential prison sentence, citing a history of investigations for sex offenses starting around 2005. The Defense counters by arguing that Mr. Epstein's compliance with his sex-offender registration mitigates any danger and that he has never attempted to flee the U.S.
DOJ-OGR-00000473.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues against granting pretrial release (bail) to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. It cites legal statutes and precedents to establish a presumption against release due to the nature of the charges (sex trafficking of a minor) and the existence of a grand jury indictment. The document also references a letter from the Government which claims Mr. Epstein poses a danger to the community and is likely to intimidate witnesses and obstruct justice if released.
DOJ-OGR-00000443.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, filed in 2019, documents events from May 2006 where an individual reported being aggressively followed by a private investigator. The surveillance is linked to Mr. Epstein retaining new legal counsel, and the report also mentions a scheduled meeting with Attorney Jack Goldberger. Additionally, the report details an investigation into phone records from March 2006 related to a victim in the case, including a log of calls made on March 7, 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00000418.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on July 16, 2019, where a lawyer is speaking on behalf of their client, Mr. Epstein. The lawyer describes a past comprehensive legal agreement that included a plea, victim compensation, and a non-prosecution agreement from the federal government. The lawyer argues that since 2008, Mr. Epstein has led a law-abiding life under constant monitoring and that the current court case arises from litigation under the Crime Victims Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00000399.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on July 16, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The discussion centers on pretrial matters for a Mr. Epstein, including clarification that he has one effective passport and a debate over whether a pretrial report indicates he refused to provide financial information or was simply incomplete. The judge also questions another attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, about allegations of witness tampering by Mr. Epstein, confirming these will be part of the government's bail submission.
DOJ-OGR-00000397.jpg
This is page 11 of a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues to The Court that the discussion should concern the scope of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), not its legality. He references a filing by Northern District of Georgia prosecutors (acting for Southern District of Florida) before Judge Marrah that supported the NPA's constitutionality and asserted Epstein fulfilled his obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000395.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (SDNY). The prosecution argues that the Southern District of New York is not bound by the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg counters that the NPA provided Epstein with immunity for the conduct currently being prosecuted, including interstate travel and communications, and asserts that Epstein fulfilled the terms of that agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000390.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, regarding the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The court discusses a search conducted at Epstein's East 71st Street residence over the previous weekend and questions the impact of discovered materials on his sex offender status. Prosecutor Rossmiller describes the materials as 'extremely concerning' regarding bail, while defense attorney Weingarten notes they have not yet seen the 'pictures' in question.
DOJ-OGR-00000381.jpg
This document is page 15 of a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing for Mr. Epstein, filed on July 15, 2019. An unidentified speaker argues against the state's determination regarding Epstein's registration, while the court upholds a board's recommendation of 130 points and notes the right to appeal. The page concludes with a certification of accuracy from the Senior Court Reporter, Vikki J. Benkel.
DOJ-OGR-00000380.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing dated July 15, 2019. An unnamed speaker, likely counsel for Mr. Epstein, argues that a prior case in Palm Beach, Florida was not prosecuted because the lead prosecutor found the complainants and the police report to be not credible. The speaker further claims that in subsequent civil litigation, the complainants provided sworn testimony disclaiming much of what was in the police report.
DOJ-OGR-00000378.jpg
This document is page 12 of a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. The dialogue involves a judge, prosecutor Ms. Gaffney, and defense attorney Ms. Musumeci discussing why Jeffrey Epstein must register as a sex offender in New York despite the specific acts (relations with a 17-year-old) not being registrable offenses under NY law; the requirement stems from reciprocity with his Florida offense. The Judge remarks that Epstein must register every 90 days or 'give up his New York home.'
DOJ-OGR-00000374.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing, filed as part of a 2019 criminal case. The text details arguments regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender registration status in New York, specifically arguing against a 'Level Three' designation which would require frequent 90-day renewals. The defense argues Epstein is compliant, rarely stays in New York for long periods, and that other jurisdictions have required lower or no registration.
DOJ-OGR-00000286.jpg
This document is a legal filing, page 13 of a motion in the case against Mr. Epstein, arguing for his pretrial release. It cites several legal precedents (United States v. Karni, United States v. Hanson, and Sabhnani) where courts ordered the release of defendants despite them being foreign nationals, having few ties to the U.S., facing serious charges, and substantial evidence of guilt. The core argument is that the potential for a significant sentence does not automatically preclude pretrial release.
DOJ-OGR-00000285.jpg
This document is page 12 of a defense filing arguing for Jeffrey Epstein's pretrial release. The defense argues that Epstein's 'tier-one' sex offender status in the U.S. Virgin Islands indicates low risk, and cites legal precedents (Sabhnani, Hansen) where wealthy defendants with foreign ties were granted bail. A significant footnote asserts Epstein is solely a U.S. citizen, his only foreign residence is in France (which has an extradition treaty), and the majority of his assets are in the U.S.
DOJ-OGR-00000275.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Mr. Epstein, arguing against his pretrial detention in a "Sex Trafficking" case. The defense contends that the alleged offenses are purely local in nature, not federal trafficking, and highlights Epstein's strong ties to the United States, including his family's presence and lack of foreign assets, to portray him as neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community. It also references his prior 2008 state guilty plea and sentence for similar conduct to frame the current indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00020694.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 19, 2021. It details orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a motion in limine to exclude evidence from 'Accuser-3' (Witness-3), ultimately ruling that testimony regarding Maxwell introducing the witness to Epstein and facilitating sexualized massages is admissible as evidence of Mann Act counts. It also mentions a letter from the prosecution team and procedural orders regarding the sealing and redaction of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020450.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from November 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries detail orders and a memorandum opinion concerning evidentiary motions, specifically the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court is ruling on what testimony from this witness regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein will be permissible, setting deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to court documents.
DOJ-OGR-00019057.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on Rodgers' annual flights to the Interlochen Arts Camp between 1991 and 1998 while employed by Mr. Epstein, and confirms Mr. Epstein had a cabin, referred to as a lodge, at that location.
DOJ-OGR-00019053.jpg
This document is page 191 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that while Jeffrey Epstein controlled the aircraft, the Boeing 727 was legally owned by 'JEGE, Incorporated' and the Gulfstream by 'Hyperion Air.' The witness also estimates that Epstein purchased a Bell helicopter in November 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00019052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, a pilot. Rodgers testifies that he kept his own personal pilot logbook and did not send it to Ghislaine (Maxwell), nor did he have reason to believe she reviewed flight manifests or knew which passengers were on flights she did not attend. The questioning then shifts to the ownership of Mr. Epstein's planes (a Gulfstream and a Boeing) between 1994 and 2004, specifically regarding their ownership by LLCs.
DOJ-OGR-00019037.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the procedures for scheduling flights for Mr. Epstein during the 1990s. Rodgers confirms that while he occasionally spoke with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine directly, the primary point of contact for scheduling was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019028.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony establishes that the cockpit door was typically open before takeoff, allowing a view of the passenger cabin. Rodgers confirms that Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, including "special guests," to him in the cockpit.
DOJ-OGR-00018996.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Rodgers testifies that he recalls one female passenger on Mr. Epstein's planes who he understood attended 'Interlochen'. Ms. Comey then instructs Mr. Rodgers to silently identify the passenger's full name using Government Exhibit 12.
DOJ-OGR-00018977.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers, a former employee and crew member for Mr. Epstein, describes a personal logbook they maintained, which recorded flight dates, destinations, flight times, and passenger names for only the flights they personally worked on. The witness is then directed to examine a document identified as Government Exhibit 662.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Epstein purchased a travel ticket for the witne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Unnamed School | $0.00 | Attorney Menninger notes that a form lists Mr. ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | The Family / The ... | $0.00 | Financial assistance/guarantor for school admis... | View |
| N/A | Received | Les | MR. EPSTEIN | $100,000,000.00 | Les Wexner theoretically owed Mr. Epstein $100 ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane Doe Number 3 | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Underage females | $200.00 | Payment for sexual massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money accepted for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots for Ms. Farmer. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane / Profession... | $0.00 | The Court notes testimony indicating Epstein wa... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Bruce Rinehart | $0.00 | Rinehart 'appeared to be being paid by Mr. Epst... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Theft of cash (band of hundred dollar bills) fr... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of boots. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Airline/Vendor | $0.00 | Purchase of a plane ticket to fly to New York. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Discussion of potential college tuition payment... | View |
| 2025-12-01 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Plaintiff (unnamed) | $0.00 | Settlement of a suit | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | THE COURT | $0.00 | Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... | View |
| 2007-05-08 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jim Eisenberg | $0.00 | Payment for attorney services for a subpoenaed ... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | Unknown | MR. EPSTEIN | $0.00 | Purchase of Bell helicopter | View |
A need to talk
Mr. Epstein contacted Mr. Alessi stating, "We need to talk."
Daily reporting
As a condition of his proposed bail, Mr. Epstein would be required to report daily by telephone to Pretrial Services.
No Subject
Southern District of New York was in regular telephone contact with Mr. Epstein until his death.
Thank you for donation and construction updates
A letter thanking Mr. Epstein for his $200,000 donation for a new scholarship lodge and providing updates on construction timelines.
Mr. Epstein's move from East 69th to 9 East 71st Street.
A deposition was taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office where Mr. Epstein was questioned about the timing of his move between two properties in early 1996.
No Subject
Polina called at 7:30 AM from 1-917-612-3450. The message states, "She's in the neighborhood".
Unknown
The document references a message on the upper right-hand corner of Exhibit 2T that says 'for Mr. Epstein'.
Missed Call
Telephoned / Please Call
Legal drama/press attention
Ghislaine Maxwell says she had phone calls with Mr. Epstein on occasion, especially during times of legal drama or press attention, to find out what was going on.
Information on building a scholarship lodge
A letter providing Mr. Epstein with information about building a scholarship lodge on Interlochen's campus and what a donation for the project would entail.
No Subject
Communicating on email (based on discovery)
Unspecified
Emails constituting 'past recollection recorded'.
Residency/Movement
Deposition excerpt regarding whether Epstein had moved.
Flight scheduling
Mr. Epstein would occasionally speak to Rodgers to schedule flights or let him know a flight was happening.
Phone Message
Telephoned. (No specific message text written)
Meeting Confirmation
she will see you at 7:30
Relaying message from Sophie
She said that Sophie got her messages + said that she's sorry for not seeing you in California.
Incoming calls
Messages written in a book with carbon copies.
Visit to the lodge
Invitation to come to the lodge, discussed in context of August dates.
Travel
Discussion about going to Thailand.
Message Pads
Discussion regarding the accuracy, dating, and authorship of messages written in message pads found in exhibits.
Building a scholarship lodge
Providing information on the concept of building a scholarship lodge on Interlochen's campus and the level of donation required.
Separation Agreement / NDA
Agreement requiring Alessi not to talk to anybody about Epstein's or Maxwell's lives.
Details/guidance
Ghislaine Maxwell emailed Mr. Epstein for details, asking 'what do I do?'
Incoming calls
Call details (name, telephone number) were written into a message book if Epstein was not present.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity