MR. EPSTEIN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
30
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employee |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employment |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Employee |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Gift giver receiver |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about her relationship with Mr. Epstein being separate from her oth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about whether Mr. Epstein had a relationship with Reid Hoffman. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about observing Reid Hoffman flying with her or Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell introducing a masseuse (DOJ REDACTION) to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's efforts to find masseuses for Jeffrey Epstein, including visiting legitimate ... | Massage spas, Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein charged federally in New York. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social parties hosted by Mr. Epstein where young women, characterized as masseuses, were guests o... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell attending weddings of famous people with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's activities and Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement, particularly r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein potentially helping Maxwell help the Clintons in the context of the Clin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for Mr. Epstein's plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period when Ghislaine Maxwell was 'general manager' for Epstein, and questions arise about lists ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawyer for Ms. Maxwell mentioned Mr. Dershowitz was among people Epstein directed to have sex with. | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Brief encounter between Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz at Epstein's New York mansion. | Mr. Epstein's mansion in Ne... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz frequently seen with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein allowed Mr. Dershowitz to use his bedroom. | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz visited Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home 4-5 times a year, staying 2-3 days. | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz received a massage at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house, stated the masseuse was not ... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] went to Miami for the weekend, returned and told Mr. Epstein she met a man who, w... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... | Mr. Epstein's mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Mr. Epstein's wealth, business, and assets (planes, island, New Mexico ranch). | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017979.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of witness Alessi) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case US v. Maxwell. The witness, Mr. Alessi, testifies that he met Ghislaine Maxwell around 1991 while working for Jeffrey Epstein and interacted with her on a daily basis until he left in 2002. During the proceeding, Alessi identifies Maxwell in the courtroom, noting she is wearing a black sweater.
DOJ-OGR-00017978.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi regarding their employment at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach property. The witness describes the property's structures, including a staff house built around 1999-2000, and states that both Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell gave them instructions about their job responsibilities.
DOJ-OGR-00017975.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies that he worked for Mr. Epstein from approximately 1990 to December 2002, initially performing repairs and dismantling rooms at the Palm Beach house. He details two phases of renovations: an initial year-long phase completed in 1991 and a subsequent 'extensive' and 'expensive' renovation by a large company completed around 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00017889.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) documenting a sidebar objection by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. She argues against the admissibility of a school record, comparing it to a police report with third-party hearsay, specifically regarding a form that lists Jeffrey Epstein as 'financially responsible' for a student referred to as 'Jane'. The defense argues it is unclear who wrote Epstein's name on the form (Jane or her mother) and challenges the reliability of that specific information.
DOJ-OGR-00017731.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Jane. She clarifies that she knew individuals named Emmy and Michelle in New York, not Florida. Jane confirms that as a 14-year-old, she stayed at Mr. Epstein's staffed, eight-story mansion in New York and that Epstein gave her "hundreds of dollars at a time" on a regular basis.
DOJ-OGR-00008370.jpg
This legal document, dated December 13, 2021, argues that testimony from attorney Robert Glassman is not protected by attorney-client privilege. It focuses on a discrepancy in a witness's ('Jane') memory, where she claimed Mr. Epstein took her to see 'The Lion King' on Broadway in 1994, three years before it premiered. The document details communications between AUSA Rossmiller and Mr. Glassman where the government pointed out the error, but Jane insisted her story was correct.
DOJ-OGR-00008365.jpg
This legal document, dated December 13, 2021, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues that the Court should permit the testimony of three witnesses—Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman—to establish motive and bias of Maxwell's accusers, after the government refused to stipulate. The document details the proposed testimony of attorney Jack Scarola, including his prior representation of an accuser named 'Carolyn' in a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein and his communications with the government.
DOJ-OGR-00008346.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 10, 2021. It captures a legal discussion between the court and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the definition of 'illegal sexual activity' in an indictment involving Mr. Epstein. The conversation centers on whether events in New Mexico constitute a crime under the Mann Act and how they relate to proving intent for illegal activity in New York, particularly concerning conspiracy charges against 'minor Victim 2'.
DOJ-OGR-00008339.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2021, detailing a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, and the judge. They are clarifying a point of law regarding the testimony of 'witness 3' about sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein. The core of the conversation is whether the defendant can be convicted 'solely' on this testimony or if it must be considered in combination with other evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008305.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 9, 2021, details the testimony of a witness, Mr. Alessi, regarding telephone directories belonging to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. Mr. Alessi describes the directories' physical characteristics, their contents (including contacts for friends, family, business, and massage therapists in Palm Beach), and how they were regularly updated. His testimony, which confirms the directories' appearance and purpose, is presented as being corroborated by other evidence, such as a 'Household Manual' (Government Exhibit 606).
DOJ-OGR-00008231.jpg
This legal filing from December 5, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues for the exclusion of specific evidence in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense contends that 2019 photographs of Jeffrey Epstein's house are irrelevant and prejudicial because items like massage tables and artwork are 'highly mobile' and may not reflect the conditions present when the accuser, Jane, was there in 1994-1996. The document asserts that the photos are inflammatory and lack connection to Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00008224.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 5, 2021, is a request from the U.S. Government to the Court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government proposes a specific limiting instruction for the jury to be read before a witness, identified as "Witness-3," testifies. The instruction aims to prevent prejudice by clarifying that any testimony about sexual conduct between Witness-3 and Mr. Epstein is not part of the charged crimes and cannot be used to judge the character or propensity of either Mr. Epstein or Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00001709.jpg
This document is a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement at the MDC violate her Sixth Amendment rights by severely restricting her ability to review discovery materials. The defense contends that the BOP's proposed three-hour daily window for reviewing documents is insufficient given the volume of evidence and conflicts with necessary time for hygiene and exercise.
DOJ-OGR-00001518.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00332-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on July 6, 2020. It quotes specific portions of prior testimony (likely a deposition) where the defendant denies knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual activities with others and explicitly denies ever giving massages to anyone, including Epstein or '[Minor Victim-2].' The document is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss, citing Title 18, Section 1623 (False Declarations before a Grand Jury/Court).
DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. A defense attorney is arguing for the release of their client (inferred to be Ghislaine Maxwell) on the grounds that reviewing voluminous electronic discovery for 'conduct that's alleged to be 25 years old' is impossible while the client is in custody during the pandemic. The attorney notes the client is in 'administrative seg.' (segregation) because authorities are 'afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein' (referencing his death in custody).
DOJ-OGR-00001065.jpg
This document is a court transcript in which an attorney refutes the government's allegations about their client's finances. The attorney argues the government has exaggerated the number of bank accounts, explains a $500,000 transfer as a maturing bond, and attributes another large transfer to the financial fallout their client experienced after Mr. Epstein's arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00001060.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021) where a defense attorney argues against the government's claim that the defendant is a flight risk for changing her contact information. The attorney explains that the defendant changed her email and phone number because she was hacked and received 'strange e-mails' after the Second Circuit unsealed civil case documents—revealing her personal data—around the time of Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in August 2019. The attorney asserts she kept the hacked phone to preserve evidence for ongoing civil litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00001056.jpg
This document is page 115 of a court transcript from April 1, 2021, involving a defense attorney arguing before a judge regarding bail conditions for a female client (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell). The attorney rebuts the government's claim that the client is a flight risk or 'hiding out,' arguing instead that she has been actively litigating civil cases since 2015 and denying impropriety regarding Mr. Epstein. The attorney also notes that a plaintiff seeking millions of dollars had spoken earlier in the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00000813.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court filing from July 18, 2019, denying aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's bail proposal. The Court argues that the defense's home confinement plan would require excessive judicial oversight and that private security is less secure than actual jail. The Court also dismisses Epstein's offer to waive extradition rights as an 'empty gesture' that no foreign country would likely honor if he fled.
DOJ-OGR-00000811.jpg
This document is a page from a court order denying bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The court determines that the defendant poses a significant flight risk due to his wealth, overseas ties (specifically in Paris), and the severity of the potential sentence (45 years). The court cites precedent such as United States v. Abdullahu to support the decision that no conditions can reasonably assure his appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00000807.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6 million Paris residence, ownership of private jets used for frequent international travel, and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals that a recent search of his New York City home uncovered an expired Austrian passport with his photo but another name, listing a residence in Saudi Arabia, further heightening concerns about his potential to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00000800.jpg
This legal document outlines the U.S. Government's argument that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to influence potential witnesses after a critical Miami Herald report was published in late 2018. The government alleges Epstein paid a total of $350,000 to two 'potential co-conspirators,' identified as Individual I and Individual II, for whom he had previously secured protection in his 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement. Individual II is specifically described as an employee who facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000793.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the pretrial release of Mr. Epstein, asserting he is a danger to the community. It cites testimony from a bail hearing on July 15, 2019, where a victim, Annie Farmer, stated she met Epstein as a minor, was flown to New Mexico, and that he was 'inappropriate' with her. The document uses this testimony to support the government's position that Epstein's release would result in the harassment and abuse of victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000792.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the pretrial detention of a defendant, Mr. Epstein. It establishes that rules of evidence are relaxed in bail hearings, giving courts wide discretion, and cites legal precedent that in cases involving sexual victimization of a minor under 18 U.S.C. § 1591, there is a presumption for remand. The document states that the burden is on Mr. Epstein to provide evidence that he is not a danger or flight risk, while the Government retains the ultimate burden of persuasion.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Epstein purchased a travel ticket for the witne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Unnamed School | $0.00 | Attorney Menninger notes that a form lists Mr. ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | The Family / The ... | $0.00 | Financial assistance/guarantor for school admis... | View |
| N/A | Received | Les | MR. EPSTEIN | $100,000,000.00 | Les Wexner theoretically owed Mr. Epstein $100 ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane Doe Number 3 | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Underage females | $200.00 | Payment for sexual massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money accepted for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots for Ms. Farmer. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane / Profession... | $0.00 | The Court notes testimony indicating Epstein wa... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Bruce Rinehart | $0.00 | Rinehart 'appeared to be being paid by Mr. Epst... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Theft of cash (band of hundred dollar bills) fr... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of boots. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Airline/Vendor | $0.00 | Purchase of a plane ticket to fly to New York. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Discussion of potential college tuition payment... | View |
| 2025-12-01 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Plaintiff (unnamed) | $0.00 | Settlement of a suit | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | THE COURT | $0.00 | Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... | View |
| 2007-05-08 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jim Eisenberg | $0.00 | Payment for attorney services for a subpoenaed ... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | Unknown | MR. EPSTEIN | $0.00 | Purchase of Bell helicopter | View |
Separation Agreement / NDA
Agreement requiring Alessi not to talk to anybody about Epstein's or Maxwell's lives.
Message Pads
Discussion regarding the accuracy, dating, and authorship of messages written in message pads found in exhibits.
Relaying message from Sophie
She said that Sophie got her messages + said that she's sorry for not seeing you in California.
Building a scholarship lodge
Providing information on the concept of building a scholarship lodge on Interlochen's campus and the level of donation required.
Meeting Confirmation
she will see you at 7:30
Mr. Epstein's move from East 69th to 9 East 71st Street.
A deposition was taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office where Mr. Epstein was questioned about the timing of his move between two properties in early 1996.
Residency/Movement
Deposition excerpt regarding whether Epstein had moved.
Phone Message
Telephoned. (No specific message text written)
Thank you for donation and construction updates
A letter thanking Mr. Epstein for his $200,000 donation for a new scholarship lodge and providing updates on construction timelines.
Travel
Discussion about going to Thailand.
Visit to the lodge
Invitation to come to the lodge, discussed in context of August dates.
A need to talk
Mr. Epstein contacted Mr. Alessi stating, "We need to talk."
No Subject
Polina called at 7:30 AM from 1-917-612-3450. The message states, "She's in the neighborhood".
Daily reporting
As a condition of his proposed bail, Mr. Epstein would be required to report daily by telephone to Pretrial Services.
Unspecified
Emails constituting 'past recollection recorded'.
Incoming calls
Messages written in a book with carbon copies.
Information on building a scholarship lodge
A letter providing Mr. Epstein with information about building a scholarship lodge on Interlochen's campus and what a donation for the project would entail.
Incoming calls
Call details (name, telephone number) were written into a message book if Epstein was not present.
Unknown
Conversation led Epstein to believe FBI would serve Marcinkova.
Non-cooperation
Pressuring her not to cooperate with Grand Jury investigation.
Unknown
Message located on top left of exhibit 1C.
Flight scheduling
Mr. Epstein would occasionally speak to Rodgers to schedule flights or let him know a flight was happening.
Missed Call
Telephoned / Please Call
Unknown
The document references a message on the upper right-hand corner of Exhibit 2T that says 'for Mr. Epstein'.
Legal drama/press attention
Ghislaine Maxwell says she had phone calls with Mr. Epstein on occasion, especially during times of legal drama or press attention, to find out what was going on.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity